Department of Rural Health, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, 200 Berkeley St, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018 May;31:38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
To develop a policy, practice, education and research agenda for evidence-based practice (EBP) in traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM).
The study was a secondary analysis of qualitative data, using the method of roundtable discussion. The sample comprised seventeen experts in EBP and T&CM. The discussion was audio-recorded, and the transcript analysed using thematic analysis.
Four central themes emerged from the data; understanding evidence and EBP, drivers of change, interpersonal interaction, and moving forward. Captured within these themes were fifteen sub-themes. These themes/sub-themes translated into three broad calls to action: (1) defining terminology, (2) defining the EBP approach, and (3) fostering social movement. These calls to action formed the framework of the agenda.
This analysis presents a potential framework for an agenda to improve EBP implementation in T&CM. The fundamental elements of this action plan seek clarification, leadership and unification on the issue of EBP in T&CM.
为传统医学和补充医学中的循证实践(EBP)制定政策、实践、教育和研究议程。
本研究是对定性数据的二次分析,采用圆桌讨论的方法。样本包括 17 名 EBP 和 T&CM 专家。讨论进行了录音,并使用主题分析对记录进行了分析。
数据中出现了四个核心主题;理解证据和 EBP、变革的驱动因素、人际互动和前进。这些主题包含了十五个子主题。这些主题/子主题转化为三个广泛的行动呼吁:(1)定义术语,(2)定义 EBP 方法,以及(3)促进社会运动。这些行动呼吁构成了该议程的框架。
本分析提出了一个可能的框架,用于制定改善 T&CM 中 EBP 实施的议程。该行动计划的基本要素旨在澄清、领导并统一 T&CM 中的 EBP 问题。