Suppr超能文献

非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂在房颤高危亚组中的适宜剂量:系统评价与荟萃分析。

Appropriate doses of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in high-risk subgroups with atrial fibrillation: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Kim In-Soo, Kim Hyun-Jung, Kim Tae-Hoon, Uhm Jae-Sun, Joung Boyoung, Lee Moon-Hyoung, Pak Hui-Nam

机构信息

Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Preventive Medicine, Institute for Evidence-based Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Cardiol. 2018 Oct;72(4):284-291. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Apr 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the dose-dependent efficacy, safety, and all-cause mortality of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in "atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who were OAC-naïve," or "AF patients with prior-stroke history" with those who were known to be high-risk subgroups under OAC.

METHODS

After a systematic database search (Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science), five phase-III randomized trials comparing NOACs and warfarin in "OAC-naïve/OAC-experienced," or "with/without prior-stroke history" subgroups were included. The outcomes were pooled using a random-effects model to determine the relative risk (RR) for stroke/systemic thromboembolism (SSTE), major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

  1. In OAC-naïve patients, standard-dose NOACs showed superior efficacy and safety with lower mortality [RR 0.90 (0.84-0.97), p=0.008, I=0%] compared to warfarin. 2. For OAC-experienced patients, low-dose NOACs showed equivalent efficacy but reduced risk of major bleeding [RR 0.61 (0.40-0.91), p=0.02, I=89%], and had lower all-cause mortality [RR 0.86 (0.75-0.99), p=0.04, I=38%] compared to warfarin. 3. For patients with prior-stroke history, low-dose NOACs showed equivalent efficacy, but reduced risk of major bleeding [RR 0.58 (0.48-0.70), p<0.001, I=0%] and all-cause mortality [RR 0.76 (0.66-0.88), p<0.001, I=0%] compared to warfarin. 4. Among patients without prior-stroke history, standard-dose NOAC was superior to warfarin for both SSTE prevention [RR 0.78 (0.66-0.91), p=0.002, I=43%] and all-cause mortality [RR 0.91 (0.85-0.97), p=0.004, I=0%].

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, standard-dose NOAC showed lower all-cause mortality than warfarin in OAC-naïve patients with AF, and low-dose NOAC was better than warfarin among the patients with prior-stroke history in terms of all-cause mortality.

摘要

背景

我们评估了非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药(NOACs)在“初治口服抗凝药(OAC)的心房颤动(AF)患者”或“有卒中病史的AF患者”中的剂量依赖性疗效、安全性及全因死亡率,这些患者属于已知的OAC治疗高危亚组。

方法

在对数据库进行系统检索(Medline、EMBASE、CENTRAL、SCOPUS和Web of Science)后,纳入了五项比较NOACs与华法林在“初治/曾用OAC”或“有/无卒中病史”亚组中的III期随机试验。使用随机效应模型汇总结果,以确定卒中/系统性血栓栓塞(SSTE)、大出血、颅内出血和全因死亡率的相对风险(RR)。

结果

  1. 在初治OAC的患者中,与华法林相比,标准剂量的NOACs显示出更高的疗效和安全性,死亡率更低[RR 0.90(0.84 - 0.97),p = 0.008,I = 0%]。2. 对于曾用OAC的患者,低剂量的NOACs显示出相当的疗效,但大出血风险降低[RR 0.61(0.40 - 0.91),p = 0.02,I = 89%],且全因死亡率低于华法林[RR 0.86(0.75 - 0.99),p = 0.04,I = 38%]。3. 对于有卒中病史的患者,低剂量的NOACs显示出相当的疗效,但大出血风险降低[RR 0.58(0.48 - 0.70),p < 0.001,I = 0%],全因死亡率也低于华法林[RR 0.76(0.66 - 0.88),p < 0.001,I = 0%]。4. 在无卒中病史的患者中,标准剂量的NOAC在预防SSTE方面优于华法林[RR 0.78(0.66 - 0.91),p = 0.002,I = 43%],全因死亡率也较低[RR 0.91(0.85 - 0.97),p = 0.004,I = 0%]。

结论

总之,在初治AF且使用OAC的患者中,标准剂量的NOAC全因死亡率低于华法林;在有卒中病史的患者中,低剂量的NOAC在全因死亡率方面优于华法林。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验