Suppr超能文献

非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝药与胺碘酮、P-糖蛋白抑制剂或心房颤动患者的多药治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants with amiodarone, P-glycoprotein inhibitors, or polypharmacy in patients with atrial fibrillation: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Preventive Medicine, Institute for Evidence-based Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Cardiol. 2019 Jun;73(6):515-521. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.12.018. Epub 2019 Feb 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Amiodarone, which inhibits CYP2C9 and P-glycoprotein, is commonly prescribed with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and polypharmacy in high-risk atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. We studied efficacy and safety of NOACs in AF patients receiving amiodarone, P-glycoprotein inhibitor, or polypharmacy.

METHODS

After a systematic database search (Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science), four phase-III randomized trials comparing NOACs and warfarin in "with/without amiodarone," "with/without P-glycoprotein inhibitors," or "with/without multiple (≥5, polypharmacy) concomitant drugs" subgroups were included. The outcomes were pooled using a random-effects model to determine the relative risks (RRs) for stroke/systemic thromboembolism (SSTE), major bleeding (MB), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Among patients taking amiodarone, superiority of NOACs over warfarin in non-amiodarone users disappeared in terms of SSTE (p=0.11), MB (p=0.95), ICH (p=0.26), and mortality (p=0.32). No safety benefit (MB) of NOACs compared to warfarin was shown in patients taking P-glycoprotein inhibitors (p=0.47), but SSTE prevention was still superior with NOACs compared to warfarin in the same patient group [RR=0.78 (0.61-0.99), p=0.04, I=11%]. In AF patients with polypharmacy, NOACs showed a lower risk of SSTE [RR=0.82 (0.71-0.96), p=0.01, I=0%] and mortality [RR=0.91 (0.83-0.99), p=0.04, I=0%], but not MB (p=0.81) compared to warfarin.

CONCLUSIONS

NOACs were equivalent to warfarin among AF patients with concomitant amiodarone use in terms of efficacy, safety, and mortality. There was no safety benefit of NOACs over warfarin in patients using polypharmacy or P-glycoprotein inhibitors.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

The protocol of this meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO under CRD42018104808 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42018104808).

摘要

背景

胺碘酮抑制 CYP2C9 和 P-糖蛋白,常用于伴有非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂(NOACs)和高危心房颤动(AF)患者的多种药物治疗。我们研究了 AF 患者接受胺碘酮、P-糖蛋白抑制剂或多种药物治疗时,NOACs 的疗效和安全性。

方法

在系统数据库搜索(Medline、EMBASE、CENTRAL、SCOPUS 和 Web of Science)后,纳入了四项比较 NOACs 与华法林在“有/无胺碘酮”、“有/无 P-糖蛋白抑制剂”或“有/无多种(≥5,多种药物)同时使用药物”亚组的 III 期随机试验。使用随机效应模型汇总结果,以确定卒中/全身性血栓栓塞(SSTE)、大出血(MB)、颅内出血(ICH)和全因死亡率的相对风险(RR)。

结果

在服用胺碘酮的患者中,NOACs 在非胺碘酮使用者中的 SSTE(p=0.11)、MB(p=0.95)、ICH(p=0.26)和死亡率(p=0.32)方面优于华法林的优势消失。与华法林相比,P-糖蛋白抑制剂组中,NOACs 没有显示出 MB 的安全性优势(p=0.47),但在同一患者组中,NOACs 预防 SSTE 仍然优于华法林[RR=0.78(0.61-0.99),p=0.04,I=11%]。在合并多种药物治疗的 AF 患者中,NOACs 降低 SSTE 风险[RR=0.82(0.71-0.96),p=0.01,I=0%]和死亡率[RR=0.91(0.83-0.99),p=0.04,I=0%]的风险较低,但 MB 风险没有降低(p=0.81),与华法林相比。

结论

在伴有胺碘酮使用的 AF 患者中,NOACs 在疗效、安全性和死亡率方面与华法林相当。在使用多种药物或 P-糖蛋白抑制剂的患者中,NOACs 并没有比华法林更安全。

系统综述注册

本荟萃分析的方案已在 PROSPERO 上注册,注册号为 CRD42018104808(https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42018104808)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验