Department of Orthopedics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Department of Orthopedics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jul;27(7):1251-1257. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.054. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
Midshaft clavicle fractures are often associated with a certain degree of shortening. There is great variety in the imaging techniques and methods to quantify this shortening. This study aims to quantify the difference in measurements of shortening and length of fracture elements between 5 views of the fractured clavicle. Furthermore, the interobserver and intraobserver agreement between these views using a standardized method is evaluated.
Digitally reconstructed radiographs were created for 40 computed tomography datasets in the anteroposterior (AP), 15° and 30° craniocaudal, and 15° and 30° caudocranial views. A standardized method for measuring the length of fracture elements and the amount of shortening was used. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement for each of the 5 views was calculated.
The interobserver and intraobserver agreement was excellent for all 5 views, with all intraclass correlation coefficient values greater than 0.75. The measured differences in relative and absolute shortening between views were statistically significant between the 30° caudocranial view and all other views. The increase in median shortening measured between the commonly used 30° caudocranial view (2.7 mm) and the AP view (8.5 mm) was 5.8 mm (P < .001). The relative median shortening between these views increased by 3.5% (P < .001).
The length of fracture elements and the amount of shortening in the fractured clavicle can be reliably measured using a standardized method. The increase in absolute and relative shortening when comparing the caudocranial measurements with the AP and craniocaudal measurements may indicate that the AP and craniocaudal views provide a more accurate representation of the degree of shortening.
锁骨中段骨折常伴有一定程度的缩短。在量化这种缩短程度时,有多种影像学技术和方法可供选择。本研究旨在定量比较 5 种不同锁骨骨折视图下测量的缩短和骨折元素长度的差异。此外,还评估了使用标准化方法测量这些视图之间的观察者间和观察者内一致性。
为 40 例计算机断层扫描数据集创建了前后位(AP)、15°和 30°颅尾位和 15°和 30°尾头位的数字重建射线照片。使用标准化方法测量骨折元素的长度和缩短量。计算了 5 种视图中每种视图的观察者间和观察者内一致性。
所有 5 种视图的观察者间和观察者内一致性均极佳,所有组内相关系数值均大于 0.75。30°尾头位视图与其他所有视图之间的相对和绝对缩短测量差异具有统计学意义。与常用的 30°尾头位视图(2.7 毫米)相比,AP 视图测量的缩短中位数增加了 5.8 毫米(P < 0.001)。这两个视图之间的相对缩短中位数增加了 3.5%(P < 0.001)。
使用标准化方法可以可靠地测量骨折锁骨的骨折元素长度和缩短程度。当将颅尾位测量值与 AP 和颅尾位测量值进行比较时,绝对和相对缩短的增加可能表明 AP 和颅尾位视图更能准确地反映缩短程度。