• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

X线投照及患者体位对锁骨骨折缩短的影响

Influence of radiographic projection and patient positioning on shortening of the fractured clavicle.

作者信息

Hoogervorst Paul, van Geene Arnoud, Gundlach Udo, Wei Abel, Verdonschot Nico, Hannink Gerjon

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

JSES Int. 2020 May 18;4(3):503-507. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.03.005. eCollection 2020 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.jseint.2020.03.005
PMID:32939476
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7478989/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Radiographic measurements of shortening and vertical displacement in the fractured clavicle are subject to a variety of factors such as patient positioning and projection. The aims of this study were (1) to quantify differences in shortening and vertical displacement in varying patient positions and X-ray projections, (2) to identify the view and patient positioning indicating the largest amount of shortening and vertical displacement, and (3) to identify and quantify the inter- and intraobserver agreement.

METHODS

A prospective clinical measurement study of 22 acute Robinson type 2B1 clavicle fractures was performed. Each patient underwent 8 consecutive standardized and calibrated X-rays in 1 setting.

RESULTS

In the upright patient position, the difference of absolute shortening was 4.5 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.0-5.9, < .0001) larger than in the supine patient position. For vertical displacement, the odds of being scored a category higher in the upright patient position were 4.7 (95% CI: 2.2-9.8) times as large as the odds of being scored a category higher in supine position. The odds of being scored a category higher on the caudocranial projection were 5.9 (95% CI: 2.8-12.6) times as large as the odds of being scored a category higher on the craniocaudal projection.

CONCLUSION

Absolute shortening, relative shortening, and vertical displacement were found to be the greatest in the upright patient positioning with the arm protracted orientation on a 15° caudocranial projection. No statistically significant differences were found for a change in position of the arm between neutral and protracted.

摘要

背景

锁骨骨折缩短和垂直移位的影像学测量受多种因素影响,如患者体位和投照方式。本研究的目的是:(1)量化不同患者体位和X线投照方式下缩短和垂直移位的差异;(2)确定显示最大缩短和垂直移位量的视图和患者体位;(3)确定并量化观察者间和观察者内的一致性。

方法

对22例急性罗宾逊2B1型锁骨骨折患者进行前瞻性临床测量研究。每位患者在同一环境下连续接受8次标准化和校准的X线检查。

结果

在直立位患者中,绝对缩短差异比仰卧位患者大4.5 mm(95%置信区间[CI]:3.0 - 5.9,P <.0001)。对于垂直移位,直立位患者被评为更高等级的几率是仰卧位患者的4.7倍(95% CI:2.2 - 9.8)。在尾头位投照中被评为更高等级的几率是颅尾位投照的5.9倍(95% CI:2.8 - 1,2.6)。

结论

发现在直立位患者体位下,手臂伸展并采用15°尾头位投照时,绝对缩短、相对缩短和垂直移位最大。手臂从中立位到伸展位的位置变化未发现统计学上的显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/017a/7478989/ebb30a18cb26/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/017a/7478989/ebb30a18cb26/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/017a/7478989/ebb30a18cb26/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Influence of radiographic projection and patient positioning on shortening of the fractured clavicle.X线投照及患者体位对锁骨骨折缩短的影响
JSES Int. 2020 May 18;4(3):503-507. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.03.005. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
Measurement of midshaft clavicle vertical displacement is not influenced by radiographic projection.锁骨中段垂直移位的测量不受X线投照的影响。
JSES Int. 2020 Feb 13;4(2):251-255. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2019.12.003. eCollection 2020 Jun.
3
Influence of x-ray direction on measuring shortening of the fractured clavicle.X 射线方向对测量锁骨骨折缩短的影响。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jul;27(7):1251-1257. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.054. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
4
Upright versus supine radiographs of clavicle fractures: does positioning matter?锁骨骨折的直立位与仰卧位X线片:体位有影响吗?
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Nov;28(11):636-41. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000129.
5
Positional Change in Displacement of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: An Aid to Initial Evaluation.锁骨中段骨折移位的位置变化:对初始评估的辅助作用
J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Jan;31(1):e9-e12. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000727.
6
Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in the classification and treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures.锁骨中段骨折的分类和治疗的观察者内和观察者间一致性。
Am J Sports Med. 2014 May;42(5):1176-81. doi: 10.1177/0363546514523926. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
7
Displacement of diaphyseal clavicle fractures related to patient position and progressive displacement in the peri-injury period.骨干锁骨骨折与患者体位相关,并在损伤期出现进行性移位。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Apr;27(4):667-673. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.01.004.
8
Does altering projection of the fractured clavicle change treatment strategy?骨折锁骨的移位是否改变治疗策略?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Mar;28(3):e65-e70. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
9
Changes in superior displacement, angulation, and shortening in the early phase of healing for completely displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents: results from a prospective, multicenter study.青少年完全移位锁骨中段骨折愈合早期上位位移、成角和缩短的变化:一项前瞻性、多中心研究的结果。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Dec;30(12):2729-2737. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.05.006. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
10
Plain film measurement error in acute displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.急性移位型锁骨中段骨折的X线平片测量误差
Can J Surg. 2016 Sep;59(5):311-6. doi: 10.1503/cjs.003016.

引用本文的文献

1
Morphologic profiles of comminuted midshaft clavicle fractures: a preliminary study.粉碎性锁骨中段骨折的形态学特征:一项初步研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Feb 1;145(1):149. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05605-x.
2
Closed midshaft clavicle fractures : an evidence-based triage management algorithm.闭合性锁骨中段骨折:一种基于证据的分诊管理算法
Bone Jt Open. 2022 Nov;3(11):850-858. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.311.BJO-2022-0083.R1.

本文引用的文献

1
Does altering projection of the fractured clavicle change treatment strategy?骨折锁骨的移位是否改变治疗策略?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Mar;28(3):e65-e70. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
2
Influence of x-ray direction on measuring shortening of the fractured clavicle.X 射线方向对测量锁骨骨折缩短的影响。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jul;27(7):1251-1257. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.054. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
3
Displacement of diaphyseal clavicle fractures related to patient position and progressive displacement in the peri-injury period.
骨干锁骨骨折与患者体位相关,并在损伤期出现进行性移位。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Apr;27(4):667-673. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.01.004.
4
Quantifying shortening of the fractured clavicle assuming clavicular symmetry is unreliable.假设锁骨对称来量化骨折锁骨的缩短情况是不可靠的。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Jun;138(6):803-807. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2912-2. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
5
The Influence of Shortening on Clinical Outcome in Healed Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures After Nonoperative Treatment.非手术治疗后愈合的移位性锁骨中段骨折短缩对临床结局的影响。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jul 19;99(14):1166-1172. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01010.
6
Plate Fixation Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.钢板固定与非手术治疗移位型锁骨中段骨折:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jun 21;99(12):1051-1057. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01068.
7
Plate Fixation Compared with Nonoperative Treatment for Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.钢板固定与非手术治疗移位型锁骨中段骨折的多中心随机对照试验
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jan 18;99(2):106-112. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01394.
8
Trends in the Incidence of Clavicle Fractures and Surgical Repair in Sweden: 2001-2012.瑞典锁骨骨折及手术修复发生率的趋势:2001 - 2012年
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Nov 2;98(21):1837-1842. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01284.
9
Positional Change in Displacement of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: An Aid to Initial Evaluation.锁骨中段骨折移位的位置变化:对初始评估的辅助作用
J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Jan;31(1):e9-e12. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000727.
10
Radiological and functional outcomes 2.7 years following conservatively treated completely displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.保守治疗完全移位的锁骨中段骨折2.7年后的放射学和功能结果
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Jan;136(1):17-25. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2354-z. Epub 2015 Nov 4.