Baek Moon Seong, Chung Chi Ryang, Kim Hwa Jung, Cho Woo Hyun, Cho Young-Jae, Park Sunghoon, Park Seung Yong, Kang Byung Ju, Kim Jung-Hyun, Park So Hee, Oh Jin Young, Sim Yun Su, Hong Sang-Bum
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Mar;10(3):1406-1417. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.71.
The proportion of elderly patients in the intensive care unit population is increasing. Although the Respiratory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Survival Prediction (RESP) score is widely used for survival prediction of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients, it is questionable whether the RESP score is applicable to older patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the applicability of the RESP score in Korean cohort.
Data were retrospectively analyzed from 209 acute respiratory failure (ARF) patients treated with ECMO from 2014 to 2015 at 11 hospitals. A comparison of outcome prediction models was conducted and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for hospital mortality.
In all patients, the median age was 58 (IQR, 45-65) years. Overall survival at hospital discharge was 45.9%, and veno-venous ECMO was used in 82.3% of patients. Patients older than 65 years treated with ECMO support were 51 with 31.4% of hospital survival. The PRedicting dEath for SEvere ARDS on VV-ECMO (PRESERVE) and RESP scores significantly predicted mortality in patients, with areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.63 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54-0.72] and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.58-0.73), respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, age is independent risk factor for hospital mortality [odds ratio 1.044 (95% CI, 1.020-1.068), P<0.001] with AUC of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.59-0.74). The RESP score was modified using reclassified age and the modified RESP score obtained AUC of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.63-0.78).
The RESP score is significant model for predicting outcomes in a Korean ECMO population. Elderly patients had higher mortality, and age alone showed similar discrimination ability for prediction of mortality compared to the RESP score.
重症监护病房中老年患者的比例正在增加。尽管呼吸体外膜肺氧合生存预测(RESP)评分被广泛用于体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)患者的生存预测,但RESP评分是否适用于老年患者仍存在疑问。本研究的目的是调查RESP评分在韩国队列中的适用性。
对2014年至2015年期间11家医院接受ECMO治疗的209例急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)患者的数据进行回顾性分析。进行了结局预测模型的比较,并进行多因素逻辑回归分析以确定医院死亡率的独立危险因素。
所有患者的中位年龄为58岁(四分位间距,45 - 65岁)。出院时的总体生存率为45.9%,82.3%的患者使用了静脉 - 静脉ECMO。接受ECMO支持的65岁以上患者有51例,医院生存率为31.4%。预测VV - ECMO上严重ARDS死亡(PRESERVE)评分和RESP评分显著预测了患者的死亡率,曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.63 [95%置信区间(CI),0.54 - 0.72]和0.66(95% CI,0.58 - 0.73)。在多因素逻辑回归分析中,年龄是医院死亡率的独立危险因素[比值比1.044(95% CI,1.020 - 1.068),P < 0.001],AUC为0.67(95% CI,0.59 - 0.74)。使用重新分类的年龄对RESP评分进行了修正,修正后的RESP评分AUC为0.71(95% CI,0.63 - 0.78)。
RESP评分是预测韩国ECMO人群结局的重要模型。老年患者死亡率较高,单独年龄与RESP评分相比,在预测死亡率方面显示出相似的辨别能力。