• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与传统中心静脉导管相比,白血病患儿外周置入中心静脉导管的血栓形成风险增加。

Increased Risk of Thrombosis Associated with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters Compared with Conventional Central Venous Catheters in Children with Leukemia.

机构信息

Institute of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; University of Lyon Claude Bernard, Lyon, France.

Institute of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 2018 Jul;198:46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.03.026. Epub 2018 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.03.026
PMID:29709343
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the risk of catheter-associated thrombosis (CAT) between peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and tunneled central venous catheters in children with leukemia.

STUDY DESIGN

We analyzed all PICCs and conventional tunneled catheters placed in patients aged <18 years and admitted to our institute for leukemia treatment between February 2008 and April 2014. Cases of symptomatic CAT were confirmed by ultrasound and treated with low-molecular-weight heparin.

RESULTS

During the study period, 157 PICCs and 138 conventional tunneled catheters were placed in 192 patients with leukemia. CAT incidence was 1.5% (n = 2) in the conventional tunneled catheter group and 10.2% (n = 16) in the PICC group. The OR for CAT occurrence after PICC vs conventional tunneled catheter placement was 5.6 (95% CI, 1.2-26.5).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the use of PICCs in children with leukemia increases the risk of CAT in comparison with the use of conventional tunneled catheters. Further randomized controlled studies are needed to characterize this risk and to better define indications.

摘要

目的

研究白血病患儿中经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管(PICC)与隧道式中心静脉置管(TCC)发生导管相关性血栓(CAT)的风险。

研究设计

我们分析了 2008 年 2 月至 2014 年 4 月期间在我院因白血病接受治疗的年龄<18 岁的所有患者中置入的 PICC 和传统 TCC。通过超声检查确认有症状的 CAT 病例,并采用低分子肝素进行治疗。

结果

在研究期间,192 例白血病患者中置入了 157 根 PICC 和 138 根传统 TCC。传统 TCC 组的 CAT 发生率为 1.5%(n=2),PICC 组为 10.2%(n=16)。与传统 TCC 相比,PICC 后发生 CAT 的 OR 为 5.6(95%CI,1.2-26.5)。

结论

与传统 TCC 相比,白血病患儿使用 PICC 会增加 CAT 的发生风险。需要进一步开展随机对照研究以明确这种风险,并更好地定义适应证。

相似文献

1
Increased Risk of Thrombosis Associated with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters Compared with Conventional Central Venous Catheters in Children with Leukemia.与传统中心静脉导管相比,白血病患儿外周置入中心静脉导管的血栓形成风险增加。
J Pediatr. 2018 Jul;198:46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.03.026. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
2
Incidence of thrombosis in children with tunneled central venous access devices versus peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs).隧道式中心静脉置管与外周静脉置入中心静脉导管(PICC)在儿童中发生血栓的情况比较。
Thromb Res. 2013 Nov;132(5):527-30. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.08.018. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
3
Line days as a determinant of central line-associated bloodstream infections in pediatric patients with tunneled femoral peripherally inserted central catheters.隧道式股外周置入中心静脉导管的儿科患者中,留置天数是中心静脉相关血流感染的决定因素。
Pediatr Radiol. 2021 Jul;51(8):1481-1486. doi: 10.1007/s00247-021-05019-6. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
4
Association between tunneled catheter placement and catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis in adults with inflammatory bowel disease receiving home parenteral nutrition: A retrospective cohort study.在接受家庭肠外营养的炎症性肠病成人中,隧道式导管放置与导管相关的深静脉血栓形成之间的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2024 Jul;48(5):562-570. doi: 10.1002/jpen.2647.
5
A Frontline Approach With Peripherally Inserted Versus Centrally Inserted Central Venous Catheters for Remission Induction Chemotherapy Phase of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Randomized Comparison.急性髓系白血病缓解诱导化疗期经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管与中心静脉置管的一线对比:一项随机比较。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 Apr;19(4):e184-e194. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
6
Venous thrombosis and stenosis after peripherally inserted central catheter placement in children.儿童经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管后的静脉血栓形成与狭窄
Pediatr Radiol. 2017 Nov;47(12):1670-1675. doi: 10.1007/s00247-017-3915-9. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
7
A prospective, randomized comparison of three different types of valved and non-valved peripherally inserted central catheters.三种不同类型的带瓣膜和不带瓣膜的外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管的前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Vasc Access. 2014 Nov-Dec;15(6):519-23. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000280. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
8
A comparison of Broviac and peripherally inserted central catheters in children with intestinal failure.肠衰竭患儿中 Broviac 导管与外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管的比较。
J Pediatr Surg. 2017 May;52(5):768-771. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.01.036. Epub 2017 Jan 29.
9
Incidence of catheter-related thrombosis in acute leukemia patients: a comparative, retrospective study of the safety of peripherally inserted vs. centrally inserted central venous catheters.急性白血病患者导管相关血栓形成的发生率:一项关于外周静脉置入与中心静脉置入中心静脉导管安全性的比较性回顾性研究。
Ann Hematol. 2016 Dec;95(12):2057-2064. doi: 10.1007/s00277-016-2798-4. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
10
Complications and Practice Variation in the Use of Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters in People With Cystic Fibrosis: The Prospective Study of Peripherally Inserted Venous Catheters in People With Cystic Fibrosis Study.在囊性纤维化患者中使用外周置入中心静脉导管的并发症和实践差异:囊性纤维化患者外周置入静脉导管的前瞻性研究。
Chest. 2023 Sep;164(3):614-624. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.03.043. Epub 2023 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Central venous access device adverse events in pediatric patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.癌症患儿中心静脉通路装置不良事件:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Sep 16;32(10):662. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08853-0.
2
Risk factors and incidence of central venous access device-related thrombosis in hospitalized children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.住院儿童中心静脉通路装置相关血栓形成的危险因素及发生率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Pediatr Res. 2024 Dec;96(7):1568-1593. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03225-0. Epub 2024 May 17.
3
Alarming Upward Trend in Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria in a Large Cohort of Immunocompromised Children: A Four-Year Comparative Study.
一大群免疫功能低下儿童中耐多药细菌的惊人上升趋势:一项为期四年的比较研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 2;15(3):938. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030938.
4
Risk factors for unplanned removal of central venous catheters in hospitalized children with hematological and oncological disorders.住院血液病和肿瘤科患儿中心静脉导管非计划性拔除的危险因素。
Int J Hematol. 2022 Aug;116(2):288-294. doi: 10.1007/s12185-022-03346-4. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
5
Systemic Catheter-Related Venous Thromboembolism in Children: Data From the Italian Registry of Pediatric Thrombosis.儿童系统性导管相关静脉血栓栓塞症:来自意大利儿科血栓登记处的数据
Front Pediatr. 2022 Mar 23;10:843643. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.843643. eCollection 2022.
6
Pediatric central venous access devices: practice, performance, and costs.儿科中心静脉置管:实践、表现和成本。
Pediatr Res. 2022 Nov;92(5):1381-1390. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-01977-1. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
7
Upper body peripherally inserted central catheter in pediatric single ventricle patients.小儿单心室患者的上肢外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管
World J Cardiol. 2020 Oct 26;12(10):484-491. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v12.i10.484.