Department of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, HRIC 2A02, 3280 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Ohlson Research Initiative, Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 May 2;47(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40463-018-0274-y.
Our study quantifies the effectiveness of perioperative pain control in a cohort of patients undergoing major head and neck surgery with free flap reconstruction. Our long-term goal is to improve pain control and thereby increase mobility, decrease postoperative complications and decrease hospital stay.
A retrospective analysis was performed at a tertiary, academic head and neck surgical oncology program in Calgary, Alberta, Canada from January 1, 2015 - December 31, 2015. Pain scores were recorded prospectively. Primary outcomes were frequency of postoperative pain assessments and pain intensity using the numeric rating scale.
The cohort included 41 patients. Analysis was limited to pain scores recorded from postoperative days 1-14. There was an average of 7.3 pain measurements per day (SD 4.6, range 1-24) with the most frequent monitoring on postoperative days 1-4. Median pain scores ranged from 0 to 4.5 with the highest median score on postoperative day 6. The daily maximum pain scores recorded ranged from 8 to 10 with scores of 10 recorded on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, and 10. Patients most frequently had inadequate pain control on postoperative days 1, 2, 4, and 5 with the majority occurring on postoperative day 1.
Postoperative pain control could be improved at our centre. The frequency of pain assessments is also highly variable. Ongoing measurement, audit, and feedback of analgesic protocol effectiveness is an excellent first step in improving perioperative pain management in patients undergoing major head and neck cancer surgery with free flap reconstruction.
我们的研究定量评估了在接受头颈部大手术伴游离皮瓣重建的患者群体中,围手术期疼痛控制的效果。我们的长期目标是改善疼痛控制,从而提高活动能力,减少术后并发症和住院时间。
在加拿大阿尔伯塔省卡尔加里的一家三级学术头颈外科肿瘤学项目中,进行了一项回顾性分析,时间范围为 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日。前瞻性记录疼痛评分。主要结局是使用数字评分量表评估术后疼痛评估的频率和疼痛强度。
该队列包括 41 名患者。分析仅限于术后 1-14 天记录的疼痛评分。平均每天有 7.3 次疼痛测量(标准差 4.6,范围 1-24),术后 1-4 天监测最频繁。中位数疼痛评分范围为 0 至 4.5,术后第 6 天最高。记录的每日最高疼痛评分范围为 8 至 10,评分 10 出现在术后第 1、2、3、5、7、8 和 10 天。患者在术后第 1、2、4 和 5 天最常出现疼痛控制不足,大多数发生在术后第 1 天。
我们中心的术后疼痛控制可以得到改善。疼痛评估的频率也存在很大差异。持续测量、审查和反馈镇痛方案的效果是改善接受头颈部大癌症手术伴游离皮瓣重建患者围手术期疼痛管理的绝佳第一步。