King Sarah R B, Schoenecker Kathryn A, Fike Jennifer A, Oyler-McCance Sara J
Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability Colorado State University Fort Collins CO USA.
United States Geological Survey Fort Collins Science Center Fort Collins CO USA.
Ecol Evol. 2018 Mar 26;8(8):4053-4064. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3956. eCollection 2018 Apr.
Fecal DNA collected noninvasively can provide valuable information about genetic and ecological characteristics. This approach has rarely been used for equids, despite the need for conservation of endangered species and management of abundant feral populations. We examined factors affecting the efficacy of using equid fecal samples for conservation genetics. First, we evaluated two fecal collection methods (paper bag vs. ethanol). Then, we investigated how time since deposition and month of collection impacted microsatellite amplification success and genotyping errors. Between May and November 2014, we collected feral horse fecal samples of known age each month in a feral horse Herd Management Area in western Colorado and documented deterioration in the field with photographs. Samples collected and dried in paper bags had significantly higher amplification rates than those collected and stored in ethanol. There was little difference in the number of loci that amplified per sample between fresh fecal piles and those that had been exposed to the environment for up to 2 months (in samples collected in paper bags). After 2 months of exposure, amplification success declined. When comparing fresh (0-2 months) and old (3-6 months) fecal piles, samples from fresh piles had more matching genotypes across samples, better amplification success and less allelic dropout. Samples defecated during the summer and collected within 2 months of deposition had highest number of genotypes matching among samples, and lowest rates of amplification failure and allelic dropout. Due to the digestive system and amount of fecal material produced by equids, as well as their occurrence in arid ecosystems, we suggest that they are particularly good candidates for noninvasive sampling using fecal DNA.
非侵入性收集的粪便DNA可以提供有关遗传和生态特征的有价值信息。尽管需要保护濒危物种和管理数量众多的野生种群,但这种方法在马科动物中很少使用。我们研究了影响使用马科动物粪便样本进行保护遗传学研究效果的因素。首先,我们评估了两种粪便收集方法(纸袋法与乙醇法)。然后,我们研究了粪便排出后的时间以及收集月份如何影响微卫星扩增成功率和基因分型错误。在2014年5月至11月期间,我们每月在科罗拉多州西部的一个野马群管理区收集已知年龄的野马粪便样本,并通过照片记录现场的样本降解情况。用收集并干燥在纸袋中的样本的扩增率显著高于收集并储存在乙醇中的样本。新鲜粪便堆和暴露于环境中长达2个月的粪便堆(收集在纸袋中的样本)之间,每个样本扩增的基因座数量几乎没有差异。暴露2个月后,扩增成功率下降。比较新鲜(0 - 2个月)和陈旧(3 - 6个月)的粪便堆时,新鲜粪便堆的样本在不同样本间有更多匹配的基因型、更好的扩增成功率和更低的等位基因缺失率。夏季排出并在排出后2个月内收集的样本在不同样本间有最多匹配的基因型,且扩增失败率和等位基因缺失率最低。由于马科动物的消化系统、粪便产生量以及它们在干旱生态系统中的存在情况,我们认为它们是使用粪便DNA进行非侵入性采样的特别合适的候选对象。