Notarnicola Angela, Perroni Fabrizio, Campese Alessio, Maccagnano Giuseppe, Monno Antonio, Moretti Biagio, Tafuri Silvio
Orthopaedics Unit, Department of Basic Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sensory Organs, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Bari, General Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Course of Motor and Sports Sciences, Department of Medical Sciences of Basis, Neurosciences and Organs of Sense, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Study of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2018 Apr 16;7(4):582-589. doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.4.582. eCollection 2017 Oct-Dec.
The aims of study were: 1) to verify the effectiveness of different stretching methods and training; 2) to compare the effects with only training on the flexibility of joints in basketball players.
30 males basketball players (age: 17±1yrs; BMI: 23.4±3.1), divided into 2 groups (15 experimental group - EG - and 15 control group, CG), participated to study. EG performed 5 different stretching method: passive stretching, active stretching, postural protocol, PNF and dynamic stretching. To assess differences (p<0.05) between groups, an ANOVA was applied to anthropometrics characteristic (age; height; weight and BMI) and flexibility performances (leg raise in a supine position; forward trunk bending). ANOVA for repeated measurements was conducted to asses differences in each group with time (i.e., pre-post).
Results showed a variation linked to time (F=21.9; p<0.0001) and an effect of the treatment of the leg raise in a supine position test (F=25.1; p<0.0001). Also in flexion test of trunk, the average values could be linked to time of measurement (F=9.96; p<0.0001) and group (F=8.65; p<0.0001).
The results suggest that a specific different stretching protocol should be used in different part of body to offer performance benefit and decreasing of the incidents of injuries.
IV.
本研究的目的是:1)验证不同拉伸方法和训练的有效性;2)比较仅进行训练对篮球运动员关节灵活性的影响。
30名男性篮球运动员(年龄:17±1岁;体重指数:23.4±3.1),分为2组(15名实验组 - EG - 和15名对照组,CG)参与研究。实验组进行5种不同的拉伸方法:被动拉伸、主动拉伸、姿势方案、本体神经肌肉促进法和动态拉伸。为评估组间差异(p<0.05),对人体测量学特征(年龄、身高、体重和体重指数)和灵活性表现(仰卧抬腿、前躯干弯曲)应用方差分析。对每组随时间(即前后)的差异进行重复测量方差分析。
结果显示与时间相关的变化(F=21.9;p<0.0001)以及仰卧抬腿测试中治疗的效果(F=25.1;p<0.0001)。在躯干屈曲测试中,平均值也与测量时间(F=9.96;p<0.0001)和组(F=8.65;p<0.0001)相关。
结果表明,应在身体的不同部位使用特定的不同拉伸方案,以提供性能益处并减少受伤事件。
IV级。