Suppr超能文献

三种不同拉伸方案对职业足球运动员腘绳肌柔韧性的影响:一项随机研究。

Effects of three different stretching protocols on hamstring muscle flexibility in professional soccer players: a randomized study.

作者信息

Manzi Vincenzo, Iellamo Ferdinando, Alashram Anas R, D'onofrio Rosario, Padua Elvira, Casasco Maurizio, Annino Giuseppe

机构信息

IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy.

Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, School of Sports Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2020 Jul;60(7):999-1004. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.20.10562-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current study aimed to investigate and compare the influences of global postural rieducation techniques (GPR), stretching exercises on a whole-body vibration platform (WBV), and static stretching exercises on hamstrings flexibility in elite soccer players.

METHODS

24 professional soccer players were randomly assigned to either global postural re-education (N.=8), stretching on whole-body vibration group (N.=8) or static stretching (N.=8), during the first 4 weeks of the precompetitive season. Assessment of hamstring muscle flexibility was performed using a straight leg raise test. All participants were assessed three times: at baseline, at the end of the study protocol and 14 days after the end of the study protocol.

RESULTS

The short-term increase in hamstring muscle flexibility was observed in all 3 groups, without significant differences among groups. However, after 14 days from the end of the interventions only the WBV group maintained the flexibility level achieved just at the end of the protocol with no significant changes in both legs whereas a significant decrease in the SLRT in GPR and SS groups, in right and left legs (GPR, P=0.002; P=0.015; SS, P=0.0001; P=0.0001), was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

These results would suggest that GPR, static stretching on whole-body vibration and static stretching techniques all improve hamstring muscle flexibility, but only stretching on WBV maintains the effect over time in professional soccer players.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在调查和比较整体姿势再教育技术(GPR)、在全身振动平台上进行的伸展运动(WBV)以及静态伸展运动对精英足球运动员腘绳肌柔韧性的影响。

方法

在赛季前竞争期的前4周,24名职业足球运动员被随机分配到整体姿势再教育组(N = 8)、全身振动伸展组(N = 8)或静态伸展组(N = 8)。使用直腿抬高试验评估腘绳肌的柔韧性。所有参与者在基线、研究方案结束时以及研究方案结束后14天进行了三次评估。

结果

所有3组均观察到腘绳肌柔韧性的短期增加,组间无显著差异。然而,在干预结束14天后,只有WBV组保持了在方案结束时达到的柔韧性水平,双腿均无显著变化,而GPR组和静态伸展组的直腿抬高试验在左右腿均有显著下降(GPR,P = 0.002;P = 0.015;静态伸展组,P = 0.0001;P = 0.0001)。

结论

这些结果表明,GPR、全身振动静态伸展和静态伸展技术均能提高腘绳肌的柔韧性,但只有在全身振动平台上进行的伸展运动能在职业足球运动员中随时间维持效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验