Department of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1074:145-150. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-75402-4_18.
A visual response to flickering light requires complex retinal computation, and thus ERG measures are an excellent test of retinal circuit fidelity. Critical flicker frequency (CFF) is the frequency at which the retinal response is no longer modulated. Traditionally, CFF is obtained with a series of steady flicker stimuli with increasing frequencies. However, this method is slow and susceptible to experimental drift and/or adaptational effects. The current study compares the steady flicker method to CFF measurements obtained using a frequency sweep protocol. We introduce a light source programmed to produce a linear sweep of frequencies in a single trial. Using the traditional steady flicker method and a criterion response of 3 μV, we obtained a scotopic CFF of 18.4 ± 0.66 Hz and a photopic CFF of 44.4 ± 1.67 Hz. Our sweep flicker method, used on the same animals, produces a waveform best analyzed by Fourier transform; wherein a 6.18 log μV threshold was found to yield CFF values equal to those of the steady flicker method. Thus, the two flicker ERG techniques give comparable results, under both dark- and light-adapted conditions, and the flicker sweep method is faster to administer and analyze and may be less susceptible to blinking, breathing, and eye movement artifacts.
对闪烁光的视觉反应需要复杂的视网膜计算,因此 ERG 测量是视网膜电路保真度的极好测试。临界闪烁频率 (CFF) 是视网膜反应不再调制的频率。传统上,通过一系列频率逐渐增加的稳定闪烁刺激来获得 CFF。然而,这种方法速度较慢,容易受到实验漂移和/或适应效应的影响。本研究将传统的稳定闪烁方法与使用频率扫描协议获得的 CFF 测量进行了比较。我们引入了一种光源,该光源编程在单次试验中产生频率的线性扫描。使用传统的稳定闪烁方法和 3 μV 的标准响应,我们获得了暗适应 CFF 为 18.4 ± 0.66 Hz 和明适应 CFF 为 44.4 ± 1.67 Hz。我们的闪烁扫描方法,在相同的动物上使用,产生的波形最适合通过傅里叶变换进行分析;其中发现 6.18 log μV 的阈值可产生与稳定闪烁方法相等的 CFF 值。因此,两种闪烁 ERG 技术在暗适应和明适应条件下均能产生可比的结果,闪烁扫描方法的实施和分析速度更快,并且可能较少受到眨眼、呼吸和眼球运动伪影的影响。