Suppr超能文献

将动机性访谈融入认知行为疗法治疗焦虑障碍的疗效:综述和荟萃分析。

The efficacy of incorporating motivational interviewing to cognitive behavior therapy for anxiety disorders: A review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

School of Psychological Sciences, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

School of Psychological Sciences, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Jun;62:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Apr 25.

Abstract

Motivational Interviewing (MI) has been suggested as an adjunct to Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) for anxiety disorders. Although preliminary evidence suggests that MI as a prelude to CBT (MI + CBT) improves various aspects of treatment from initial engagement, overall symptom reduction, and treatment drop out rate, results are inconsistent. The current meta-analysis combined the findings of 12 trials examining the efficacy of MI + CBT in comparison to CBT alone. Across studies, MI + CBT outperformed standard CBT in terms of overall anxiety symptom reduction, Hedges g = 0.59. Drop out rates were not significantly different between groups. Moderator analyses revealed no significant differences based on specific anxiety diagnosis or dose of MI. The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that MI as an adjunct to CBT for anxiety disorders improves treatment outcome, in comparison to CBT alone. Limitations of the study and future research directions are explored.

摘要

动机访谈(MI)被建议作为焦虑障碍认知行为疗法(CBT)的辅助手段。虽然初步证据表明,MI 作为 CBT 的前奏(MI+CBT)可以改善治疗的各个方面,从最初的参与度、整体症状减轻和治疗脱落率,但结果不一致。目前的荟萃分析综合了 12 项研究的结果,这些研究检查了 MI+CBT 与单独 CBT 相比的疗效。在所有研究中,MI+CBT 在整体焦虑症状减轻方面优于标准 CBT,Hedges g=0.59。两组的脱落率没有显著差异。基于特定的焦虑诊断或 MI 的剂量,调节分析显示没有显著差异。这项荟萃分析的结果表明,MI 作为焦虑障碍 CBT 的辅助手段,可以改善治疗效果,与单独 CBT 相比。探讨了研究的局限性和未来的研究方向。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验