Suppr超能文献

认知行为疗法与动机访谈相结合治疗广泛性焦虑障碍中,患者人际影响作为长期疗效的中介。

Client interpersonal impacts as mediators of long-term outcome in cognitive-behavioral therapy integrated with motivational interviewing for generalized anxiety disorder.

机构信息

a Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences , University of Massachusetts Amherst , Amherst , MA , USA.

b Department of Psychology , York University , Toronto , Canada.

出版信息

Psychother Res. 2018 Nov;28(6):861-872. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2017.1301689. Epub 2017 Mar 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A recent trial of generalized anxiety disorder treatment (Westra, H. A., Constantino, M. J., & Antony, M. M. (2016). Integrating Motivational Interviewing With Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Severe Generalized Anxiety Disorder: An Allegiance-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84, 768-782. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000098 ) revealed that cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) integrated with motivational interviewing (MI) outperformed CBT alone across a 12-month follow up. The present study examined whether this treatment effect was mediated by MI-CBT clients engaging over time in during-session interpersonal behaviors reflecting more friendly dominance, or agentic actions, and less friendly submissiveness (FS), or trustingly compliant actions both theory-specific MI mechanisms.

METHOD

Clients received 15 sessions of MI-CBT (n = 42) or CBT alone (n = 43). Therapists rated client interpersonal behavior following five sessions, and clients rated their worry at baseline, each session, and 6- and 12-month follow up. Mediator and outcome variables were derived from multilevel models. Mediation was tested using a bootstrapping procedure.

RESULTS

There was a significant indirect effect for FS. As expected, CBT clients evidenced greater increases in FS than MI-CBT clients, which in turn, though unexpectedly, related to lower 12-month worry. However, long-term CBT outcomes remained inferior to MI-CBT outcomes even with CBT clients'greater increase in FS.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that CBT outcomes are more positive when clients trustingly comply; however, MI-CBT remained superior, but for as yet unexplained reasons.

摘要

目的

最近一项广泛性焦虑障碍治疗的试验(Westra,H. A.,Constantino,M. J.,& Antony,M. M.(2016)。将动机访谈与认知行为疗法相结合治疗严重广泛性焦虑障碍:一项忠诚控制的随机临床试验。咨询与临床心理学杂志,84,768-782。doi:10.1037/ccp0000098)表明,认知行为疗法(CBT)与动机访谈(MI)相结合在 12 个月的随访中优于单独的 CBT。本研究检验了这种治疗效果是否通过 MI-CBT 客户随着时间的推移在反映更友好支配力或代理行为、更少友好顺从性(FS)或信任顺从行为的会话内人际行为中得到介导,这两种行为都是特定的 MI 机制。

方法

客户接受 15 次 MI-CBT(n = 42)或单独的 CBT(n = 43)。治疗师在五次治疗后对客户的人际行为进行评分,客户在基线、每次治疗和 6 个月及 12 个月随访时对其担忧进行评分。中介和结果变量来自多层次模型。使用 bootstrap 程序测试中介作用。

结果

FS 存在显著的间接效应。正如预期的那样,CBT 客户的 FS 增加幅度大于 MI-CBT 客户,而这反过来又出乎意料地与 12 个月后担忧程度降低有关。然而,即使 CBT 客户的 FS 增加幅度更大,长期 CBT 结果仍逊于 MI-CBT 结果。

结论

结果表明,当客户信任顺从时,CBT 结果更积极;然而,MI-CBT 仍然更优越,但原因尚不清楚。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验