• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社论评论:少花钱能否办好事:肩袖旋转肌锚钉需要用多少?

Editorial Commentary: Can We Do Better While Spending Less: How Many Shoulder Rotator Cuff Anchors Are Enough?

机构信息

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2018 May;34(5):1401-1402. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.003
PMID:29729751
Abstract

We have published that shoulder rotator cuff tear is a highly cost-effective procedure, and to continue to improve value, a goal is to contain cost while maintaining or improving outcome. To bend the cost curve, reduction in direct costs (number of suture anchors used) could be a goal, and because rotator cuff repair failures are as much biologic as they are mechanical, the effect of adding anchors to improve outcomes has an obvious limit.

摘要

我们已经发表了肩袖撕裂是一项具有高性价比的手术,为了继续提高价值,目标是在保持或改善结果的同时控制成本。为了降低成本曲线,减少直接成本(缝线锚钉的使用数量)可能是一个目标,而且由于肩袖修复失败既有生物学因素,也有机械因素,因此增加锚钉来改善结果的效果显然是有限的。

相似文献

1
Editorial Commentary: Can We Do Better While Spending Less: How Many Shoulder Rotator Cuff Anchors Are Enough?社论评论:少花钱能否办好事:肩袖旋转肌锚钉需要用多少?
Arthroscopy. 2018 May;34(5):1401-1402. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.003.
2
Editorial Commentary: "Knot" Less Strength at Half the Cost-Is It Time to Abandon Medial Row Anchors in Shoulder Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair?社论评论:“一半的成本,两倍的强度”——在肩袖双排修复中是否是时候放弃内侧排锚钉了?
Arthroscopy. 2018 Jan;34(1):64-65. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.09.008.
3
Clinical Outcomes of Modified Mason-Allen Single-Row Repair for Bursal-Sided Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: Comparison With the Double-Row Suture-Bridge Technique.改良梅森-艾伦单排修复术治疗滑囊侧部分厚度肩袖撕裂的临床结果:与双排缝线桥技术的比较
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1976-82. doi: 10.1177/0363546515587718. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
4
Radiolucent rings around bioabsorbable anchors after rotator cuff repair are not associated with clinical outcomes.肩袖修复术后生物可吸收锚钉周围的透亮环与临床结果无关。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Nov;137(11):1539-1546. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2772-1. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
5
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with metal and biodegradable suture anchors: a prospective randomized study.关节镜下金属和可生物降解缝线锚钉修复肩袖撕裂:前瞻性随机研究。
Arthroscopy. 2010 Sep;26(9 Suppl):S112-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.01.030. Epub 2010 Aug 6.
6
Editorial Commentary: Restoration of Rotator Cuff Footprint Anatomy Is All That Matters, No Matter How We Get There.社论评论:无论我们如何实现,恢复肩袖足印解剖结构才是最重要的。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Dec;34(12):3157-3158. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.08.023.
7
Editorial Commentary: Choose Wisely: Rotator Cuff All-Suture Anchors.社论评论:明智选择:全缝线锚定的肩袖修复。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Nov;36(11):2812-2813. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.09.009.
8
Rotator cuff repair with all-suture anchors: a midterm magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of repair integrity and cyst formation.全缝线锚钉修复肩袖:修复完整性和囊形成的中期磁共振成像评估。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Nov;27(11):2006-2012. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 May 22.
9
Clinical outcome and imaging of arthroscopic single-row and double-row rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized trial.关节镜下单排和双排肩袖修复的临床结果和影像学比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Arthroscopy. 2012 Jan;28(1):16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.07.003. Epub 2011 Oct 7.
10
Editorial Commentary: Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears-Does the Suture Pattern Matter?社论评论:层裂性肩袖撕裂——缝线方式重要吗?
Arthroscopy. 2018 Nov;34(11):2952-2953. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.08.003.