Mina Sergio Hernando, Garcia-Perdomo Herney Andres
Universidad del Valle, Department of Urology, Santiago de Cali, Colombia.
Urology Research Group (UROGIV), Universidad del Valle, Santiago de Cali, Colombia.
Cent European J Urol. 2018;71(1):72-77. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2017.1581. Epub 2017 Jan 1.
The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of tranexamic acid in decreasing bleeding in patients undergoing prostate surgery.
All clinical experiments were included without language restrictions. The inclusion criteria were as follows: men over 18 years of age who underwent prostate surgery (transurethral, prostate adenectomy, and radical prostatectomy) and received tranexamic acid prior to prostate surgery as a preventive measure for perioperative hemorrhage. Prophylactic tranexamic acid vs. no intervention or placebo were compared. The primary outcomes were as follows: 1) intraoperative blood loss and 2) the need for red blood cell transfusion. A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and LILACS. Other sources were used to discover published and unpublished literature sources. The statistical analysis was performed in Review Manager v.5.3.
Four studies were included with a total of 436 patients. Three of the four studies had small sample sizes. There was a low risk of attrition bias and reporting bias. Unclear risk of selection bias, performance bias, or detection bias was presented. A mean difference (MD) of -174.49 [95% CI (-248.43 to -100.56)] was found for perioperative blood loss (the primary outcome). At the end of the procedure, the hemoglobin concentration had a MD of -1.19 [95% CI (-4.37 to 1.99)].
Tranexamic acid is effective at preventing perioperative blood loss compared with the placebo in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). However, this treatment was not effective neither at preventing the need for transfusions nor at increasing hemoglobin values at the end of the procedure.
本研究的目的是确定氨甲环酸在减少前列腺手术患者出血方面的有效性。
纳入所有无语言限制的临床实验。纳入标准如下:年龄超过18岁、接受前列腺手术(经尿道前列腺切除术、前列腺腺切除术和根治性前列腺切除术)且在前列腺手术前接受氨甲环酸作为围手术期出血预防措施的男性。比较预防性氨甲环酸与无干预或安慰剂。主要结局如下:1)术中失血;2)红细胞输血需求。在MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL和LILACS中进行了系统检索。使用其他来源查找已发表和未发表的文献来源。在Review Manager v.5.3中进行统计分析。
纳入四项研究,共436例患者。四项研究中的三项样本量较小。失访偏倚和报告偏倚风险较低。存在选择偏倚、执行偏倚或检测偏倚的风险不明确。围手术期失血(主要结局)的平均差值(MD)为-174.49 [95%置信区间(-248.43至-100.56)]。在手术结束时,血红蛋白浓度的MD为-1.19 [95%置信区间(-4.37至1.99)]。
与安慰剂相比,氨甲环酸在预防经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)患者围手术期失血方面有效。然而,这种治疗在预防输血需求或在手术结束时提高血红蛋白值方面均无效。