Morio Cédric Y M, Herbaut Alexis
Decathlon Sports Lab, Department of Movement Sciences, France.
Decathlon Sports Lab, Department of Movement Sciences, France.
Hum Mov Sci. 2018 Jun;59:212-222. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2018.04.016. Epub 2018 May 4.
Although shoe friction has been widely studied in occupational ergonomics, information was lacking about friction in sport shoes. The purpose of the study was to examine the neuromechanical adaptations to different shoe-surface interface in an aerobic-gym specific movement. Sixteen females performed 10 change of direction movements in two shoe conditions differing by their outsoles (ethyl-vinyl-acetate: EVA and rubber: RB) to ensure significant differences in mechanical coefficients of friction (EVA = 0.73 ± 0.07 and RB = 1.46 ± 0.15). The kinematics, kinetics and muscle activities of the right lower-limb were analysed. Statistical parametric mapping was used to investigate the kinematics and kinetics adaptation to the different shoe-surface coefficients of friction. The participants had a longer stance duration in the EVA compared to the RB condition (526 ± 160 ms vs. 430 ± 151 ms, p < .001). The ankle and knee joints powers and works were lower during both the braking and the push-off phases in the EVA as compared to the RB condition. Preactivation of the agonist muscles (soleus, gastrocnemius medialis and vastus medialis) decreased in the EVA compared to the RB condition (-28.5%, -26.5% and -49.0%, respectively). Performing a change of direction movement with slippery shoes reduced the ankle and knee joints loadings, but impaired the stretch-shortening cycle performance. Participants demonstrated thus a different neuromechanical strategy to control their movement which was associated with a reduced performance.
尽管鞋类摩擦力在职业人体工程学中已得到广泛研究,但关于运动鞋摩擦力的信息却很匮乏。本研究的目的是在有氧健身特定运动中,考察对不同鞋与地面界面的神经力学适应情况。16名女性在两种鞋底不同的鞋子条件下进行了10次变向运动(乙烯 - 醋酸乙烯酯:EVA和橡胶:RB),以确保机械摩擦系数存在显著差异(EVA = 0.73±0.07,RB = 1.46±0.15)。对右下肢的运动学、动力学和肌肉活动进行了分析。采用统计参数映射法研究对不同鞋与地面摩擦系数的运动学和动力学适应情况。与RB条件相比,参与者在EVA条件下的站立持续时间更长(526±160毫秒对430±151毫秒,p <.001)。与RB条件相比,在EVA条件下,制动和蹬离阶段的踝关节和膝关节功率及功均较低。与RB条件相比,EVA条件下主动肌(比目鱼肌、内侧腓肠肌和股内侧肌)的预激活减少(分别为-28.5%、-26.5%和-49.0%)。穿着防滑鞋进行变向运动会降低踝关节和膝关节的负荷,但会损害拉长 - 缩短周期性能。因此,参与者展示了一种不同的神经力学策略来控制其运动,而这与运动表现下降有关。