Suppr超能文献

一位编辑对美国生殖医学学会最近委员会意见的看法,该意见认为黄体期缺陷作为导致不孕的临床实体尚未得到证实。

An Editor's opinion of the recent committee opinion of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine that the luteal phase deficiency as a clinical entity causing infertility has not been proven.

作者信息

Check J H

出版信息

Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2016;43(4):479-483.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To present an opposing view to the recent conclusions reached by the Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and a recent review of the role of progesterone in subfertility by Sonntag and Ludwig that there is no evidence to support using progesterone in the luteal phase as exclusive therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A large quasi randomized study not mentioned by either review is presented.

RESULTS

In this study published in 1989 when women with luteal phase deficiencies and subfertil- ity were evaluated for follicular maturation, the majority seemed to form mature follicles. This majority group found far better with pregnancy outcome by taking exclusive progesterone in the luteal phase than follicle maturing drugs. A recent prospective series confirmed its beneficial effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians should not empirically treat with follicle maturing drugs but should use progesterone in the luteal phase, preferably in those women who seemingly create a mature follicle.

摘要

目的

对美国生殖医学学会实践委员会最近得出的结论以及桑塔格和路德维希最近对孕酮在亚生育中作用的综述提出反对观点,即没有证据支持在黄体期使用孕酮作为唯一疗法。

材料与方法

介绍一项未被上述任何一篇综述提及的大型半随机研究。

结果

在这项1989年发表的研究中,当对黄体期缺陷和亚生育的女性进行卵泡成熟评估时,大多数人似乎形成了成熟卵泡。这一多数群体在黄体期单独服用孕酮时的妊娠结局比使用卵泡成熟药物要好得多。最近的一个前瞻性系列研究证实了其有益效果。

结论

医生不应凭经验使用卵泡成熟药物,而应在黄体期使用孕酮,最好是在那些似乎能形成成熟卵泡的女性中使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验