• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开展一项开放性前瞻性观察性多中心队列研究,以确定腹腔镜腹膜内补片修补术(IPOM)标准化治疗切口疝对临床结局和生活质量的影响(LIPOM试验)。

Development of an open prospective observational multicentre cohort study to determine the impact of standardization of laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) for incisional hernia on clinical outcome and quality of life (LIPOM-Trial).

作者信息

Hellinger A, Wotzlaw F, Fackeldey V, Pistorius G, Zdichavsky M, Jünemann R, Buia A

机构信息

Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Klinikum Fulda, Universitätsmedizin Marburg - Campus Fulda, Fulda, Germany.

Department of General, Vascular and Visceral Surgery, Klinik Kitzinger Land, Kitzingen, Germany.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016 Aug 11;4:118-123. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.08.001. eCollection 2016 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.conctc.2016.08.001
PMID:29736474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5935894/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Incisional hernias are one of the most frequent complications in abdominal surgery. Laparoscopic repair has been widely used since its first description but has not been standardized. A panel of hernia experts with expertise on the subject "incisional hernia" was established to review existing literature and define a standard approach to laparoscopic IPOM-repair for incisional hernia. All involved surgeons agreed to perform further IPOM-repairs of incisional hernia according to the protocol.

METHODS/DESIGN: This article summarizes the development of an open prospective observational multicentre cohort study to analyse the impact of a standardization of laparoscopic IPOM-repair for incisional hernia on clinical outcome and quality of life (health care research study).

DISCUSSION

Our literature search found that there is a lack of standardization in the surgical approach to incisional hernia and the use of medical devices. The possibility of different surgical techniques, various meshes and a variety of mesh fixation techniques means that the results on outcome after incisional hernia repair are often not comparable between different studies. We believe there is a need for standardization of the surgical procedure and the use of medical devices in order to make the results more comparable and eliminate confounding factors in interpreting the results of surgical hernia repair. This approach, in our view, will also illustrate the influence of the operative technique on the general quality of surgical treatment of incisional hernias better than a "highly selective" study and will indicate the "reality" of surgical treatment not only in specialist centres.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The LIPOM-trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov, with identifier: NCT02089958.

摘要

背景

切口疝是腹部手术中最常见的并发症之一。自首次描述以来,腹腔镜修补术已被广泛应用,但尚未标准化。成立了一个由切口疝领域专家组成的小组,以回顾现有文献并确定切口疝腹腔镜腹腔内补片修补术(IPOM)的标准方法。所有参与的外科医生都同意根据该方案进一步进行切口疝的IPOM修补术。

方法/设计:本文总结了一项开放性前瞻性观察性多中心队列研究的开展情况,以分析切口疝腹腔镜IPOM修补术标准化对临床结局和生活质量的影响(卫生保健研究)。

讨论

我们的文献检索发现,切口疝的手术方法和医疗器械的使用缺乏标准化。不同的手术技术、各种补片和多种补片固定技术的可能性意味着,不同研究之间切口疝修补术后的结果往往不可比。我们认为,需要对外科手术程序和医疗器械的使用进行标准化,以使结果更具可比性,并消除解释疝修补手术结果时的混杂因素。我们认为,这种方法也将比“高度选择性”研究更好地说明手术技术对切口疝外科治疗总体质量的影响,并不仅在专科中心显示外科治疗的“实际情况”。

试验注册

LIPOM试验已在www.clinicaltrials.gov上注册,标识符为:NCT02089958。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/226f/5935894/74a9b6731dde/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/226f/5935894/74a9b6731dde/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/226f/5935894/74a9b6731dde/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of an open prospective observational multicentre cohort study to determine the impact of standardization of laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) for incisional hernia on clinical outcome and quality of life (LIPOM-Trial).开展一项开放性前瞻性观察性多中心队列研究,以确定腹腔镜腹膜内补片修补术(IPOM)标准化治疗切口疝对临床结局和生活质量的影响(LIPOM试验)。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016 Aug 11;4:118-123. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.08.001. eCollection 2016 Dec 15.
2
Comparison of Mesh Fixation Techniques in Elective Laparoscopic Repair of Incisional Hernia-ReliaTack™ v ProTack™ (TACKoMesh) - A double-blind randomised controlled trial.择期腹腔镜切口疝修补术中Mesh固定技术的比较——ReliaTack™与ProTack™(TACKoMesh)——一项双盲随机对照试验。
BMC Surg. 2018 Jul 11;18(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0378-3.
3
Is fascial defect closure with intraperitoneal onlay mesh superior to standard intraperitoneal onlay mesh for laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernia?对于腹腔镜修补大型切口疝,采用腹腔内置入补片并封闭筋膜缺损的方法是否优于标准的腹腔内置入补片法?
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2018 Nov;11(4):378-384. doi: 10.1111/ases.12471. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
4
Small bowel lesion due to spiral tacks after laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for incisional hernia.腹腔镜腹膜内补片修补术后因螺旋钉导致的小肠损伤(用于切口疝修补)
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2013;4(3):283-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2012.12.005. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
5
Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair using n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (Liquiband Fix8™) for mesh fixation: learning experience and short-medium term results.腹腔镜腹腔内补片固定术(IPOM)使用 n-丁基-2-氰基丙烯酸酯(Liquiband Fix8™)固定补片:学习经验和中短期结果。
Hernia. 2020 Dec;24(6):1387-1396. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02144-3. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
6
Health Technology Assessment of laparoscopic compared to conventional surgery with and without mesh for incisional hernia repair regarding safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness.腹腔镜手术与传统手术(有无补片)治疗切口疝修复术的安全性、有效性和成本效益的卫生技术评估。
GMS Health Technol Assess. 2008 Mar 7;4:Doc01.
7
A Randomised Prospective Study to Evaluate Preperitoneal Mesh Repair Versus Onlay Mesh Repair and Laparoscopic IPOM in Incisional Hernia Surgery.一项评估切口疝手术中腹膜前补片修补术与覆盖补片修补术及腹腔镜腹腔内补片植入修补术的随机前瞻性研究。
Indian J Surg. 2017 Apr;79(2):96-100. doi: 10.1007/s12262-015-1430-5. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
8
Analysis of 4,015 recurrent incisional hernia repairs from the Herniamed registry: risk factors and outcomes.对来自Herniamed注册中心的4015例复发性切口疝修补术的分析:危险因素和结果。
Hernia. 2021 Feb;25(1):61-75. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02263-x. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
9
Polyvinylidene fluoride: a suitable mesh material for laparoscopic incisional and parastomal hernia repair! A prospective, observational study with 344 patients.聚偏二氟乙烯:一种适用于腹腔镜切口疝和造口旁疝修补的网片材料!一项对344例患者的前瞻性观察研究。
Hernia. 2009 Apr;13(2):167-72. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0435-4. Epub 2008 Oct 14.
10
A novel auxiliary fixation technique of meshes in intraperitoneal onlay mesh procedures for incisional hernia repair.一种用于切口疝修补的腹膜内补片修补术中补片的新型辅助固定技术。
Front Surg. 2023 Jun 20;10:1201992. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1201992. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Standardization of laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for incisional hernia: Impact on clinical outcome and quality-of-life (LIPOM trial, NCT 02089958).腹腔镜腹腔内补片植入修补切口疝的标准化:对临床结局和生活质量的影响(LIPOM试验,NCT 02089958)
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2025 Mar 29;45:101481. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101481. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Postoperative outcomes and wound events in incisional hernia repair using hybrid mesh: results from a prospective multicenter italian study.使用混合补片进行切口疝修补术的术后结局和伤口情况:一项意大利前瞻性多中心研究的结果
Hernia. 2025 Feb 18;29(1):94. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03285-z.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Is pooled data analysis of ventral and incisional hernia repair acceptable?腹侧疝和切口疝修补术的汇总数据分析是否可行?
Front Surg. 2015 May 12;2:15. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2015.00015. eCollection 2015.
2
The management of abdominal wall hernias - in search of consensus.腹壁疝的管理——寻求共识。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2015 Apr;10(1):49-56. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2015.49512. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
3
IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 2: observational studies in the exploration and assessment stages.手术创新的理想框架 2:探索和评估阶段的观察性研究。
The Importance of Registries in the Postmarketing Surveillance of Surgical Meshes.
在外科补片的上市后监测中注册研究的重要性。
Ann Surg. 2018 Dec;268(6):1097-1104. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002326.
BMJ. 2013 Jun 18;346:f3011. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3011.
4
Recommendations for reporting outcome results in abdominal wall repair: results of a Consensus meeting in Palermo, Italy, 28-30 June 2012.腹壁修复结局结果报告建议:2012 年 6 月 28-30 日在意大利巴勒莫召开的共识会议结果。
Hernia. 2013 Aug;17(4):423-33. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1108-5. Epub 2013 May 15.
5
Short- and mid-term outcome after laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernia.腹腔镜修补巨大切口疝的近期和中期疗效。
Hernia. 2013 Oct;17(5):567-72. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-1026-y. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
6
Analysing the benefits of laparoscopic hernia repair compared to open repair: A meta-analysis of observational studies.分析腹腔镜疝修补术与开放修补术相比的益处:一项观察性研究的荟萃分析。
J Minim Access Surg. 2012 Oct;8(4):111-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.103107.
7
Importance of recurrence rating, morphology, hernial gap size, and risk factors in ventral and incisional hernia classification.复发率、形态、疝缺损大小和危险因素在腹疝和切口疝分类中的重要性。
Hernia. 2014 Feb;18(1):19-30. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0999-x. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
8
Is the outcome of laparoscopic incisional hernia repair affected by defect size? A prospective study.腹腔镜切口疝修补术的结果是否受缺损大小的影响?一项前瞻性研究。
Am J Surg. 2012 Jan;203(1):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.11.017. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
9
Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair.腹腔镜与开放手术技术用于腹侧或切口疝修补术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Mar 16(3):CD007781. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007781.pub2.
10
[Laparoscopic IPOM technique].[腹腔镜下腹腔内补片修补术技术]
Chirurg. 2010 Mar;81(3):211-5. doi: 10.1007/s00104-009-1819-4.