• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of Mesh Fixation Techniques in Elective Laparoscopic Repair of Incisional Hernia-ReliaTack™ v ProTack™ (TACKoMesh) - A double-blind randomised controlled trial.择期腹腔镜切口疝修补术中Mesh固定技术的比较——ReliaTack™与ProTack™(TACKoMesh)——一项双盲随机对照试验。
BMC Surg. 2018 Jul 11;18(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0378-3.
2
TACKoMesh - A randomised controlled trial comparing absorbable versus non-absorbable tack fixation in laparoscopic IPOM + repair of primary incisional hernia using post-operative pain and quality of life - Reliatack™ versus Protack™.TACKoMesh- 一项比较可吸收与不可吸收缝线固定在腹腔镜 IPOM+原发性切口疝修补术中的随机对照试验,比较术后疼痛和生活质量- ReliatackTM 与 ProtackTM。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1879-1888. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03111-y. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
3
Mesh fixation techniques in primary ventral or incisional hernia repair.网片固定技术在原发性腹侧或切口疝修补术中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 28;5(5):CD011563. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011563.pub2.
4
Titanium versus absorbable tacks comparative study (TACS): a multicenter, non-inferiority prospective evaluation during laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernia: study protocol for randomized controlled trial.钛钉与可吸收钉对比研究(TACS):腹腔镜修补腹直肌旁疝和切口疝的多中心、非劣效性前瞻性评估:随机对照试验研究方案
Trials. 2015 Jun 4;16:249. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0779-x.
5
Decreased re-operation rate for recurrence after defect closure in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with a permanent tack fixated mesh: a nationwide cohort study.使用永久钉固定补片的腹腔镜腹疝修补术中缺损闭合后复发的再次手术率降低:一项全国性队列研究
Hernia. 2018 Aug;22(4):577-584. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1776-2. Epub 2018 May 10.
6
Recurrence rate after absorbable tack fixation of mesh in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair.可吸收钉固定网片在腹腔镜切口疝修补术后的复发率。
Br J Surg. 2015 Apr;102(5):541-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9750. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
7
Effect of fixation devices on postoperative pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial of permanent tacks, absorbable tacks, and synthetic glue.固定装置对腹腔镜腹疝修补术后疼痛的影响:永久性缝钉、可吸收缝钉及合成胶水的一项随机临床试验
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Jun;403(4):529-537. doi: 10.1007/s00423-018-1676-z. Epub 2018 May 25.
8
Unidirectional barbed sutures as a novel technique for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.单向倒刺缝线作为腹腔镜腹疝修补的新技术。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):764-769. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4275-x. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
9
Trans-fascial closure in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术中的经筋膜闭合术
Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5228-5231. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4868-z. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
10
Meta-analysis of closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜切口疝和腹疝修补术中筋膜缺损闭合的荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2016 Nov;103(12):1598-1607. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10268. Epub 2016 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Sutureless "Slim-Mesh" Technique for the Repair of Abdominal-Wall Hernias in the Obese Population.用于肥胖人群腹壁疝修补的无缝合“超薄补片”技术
JSLS. 2025 Jan-Mar;29(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00072. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
2
TACKoMesh - A randomised controlled trial comparing absorbable versus non-absorbable tack fixation in laparoscopic IPOM + repair of primary incisional hernia using post-operative pain and quality of life - Reliatack™ versus Protack™.TACKoMesh- 一项比较可吸收与不可吸收缝线固定在腹腔镜 IPOM+原发性切口疝修补术中的随机对照试验,比较术后疼痛和生活质量- ReliatackTM 与 ProtackTM。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1879-1888. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03111-y. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
3
Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM) in the Treatment of Ventral Hernias: Technique Discussion Points.腹腔镜腹腔内补片植入术(IPOM)治疗腹疝:技术要点探讨
Cureus. 2024 May 27;16(5):e61199. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61199. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Multifactor study of efficacy and recurrence in laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术疗效及复发的多因素研究
World J Clin Cases. 2021 May 26;9(15):3559-3566. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i15.3559.

本文引用的文献

1
Primary fascial closure with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: systematic review.腹腔镜腹疝修补术的一期筋膜关闭:系统评价
World J Surg. 2014 Dec;38(12):3097-104. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2722-9.
2
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: is there an optimal mesh fixation technique? A systematic review.腹腔镜腹疝修补术:是否存在最佳的补片固定技术?一项系统评价。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Jan;399(1):55-63. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1126-x.
3
Randomized clinical trial of mesh fixation with "double crown" versus "sutures and tackers" in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.随机临床试验:网片固定采用“双帽”与“缝线和钉枪”在腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术中的比较。
Hernia. 2013 Oct;17(5):603-12. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1084-9. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
4
Comparison of long-term outcome and quality of life after laparoscopic repair of incisional and ventral hernias with suture fixation with and without tacks: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.腹腔镜缝合固定修补切口疝和腹疝与使用和不使用吻合钉的长期疗效和生活质量比较:一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Dec;26(12):3476-85. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2390-5. Epub 2012 Jun 23.
5
A new classification for seroma after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜下腹膜前修补术后血清肿的新分类。
Hernia. 2012 Jun;16(3):261-7. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0911-8. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
6
Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair with mesh for the treatment of ventral incisional hernia: a randomized trial.腹腔镜与开放修补加补片治疗腹直肌切口疝的比较:一项随机试验
Arch Surg. 2010 Apr;145(4):322-8; discussion 328. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.18.
7
Mesh-fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques.网片固定方法与腹腔镜腹侧或切口疝修补术后疼痛和生活质量:三种固定技术的随机试验。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Jun;24(6):1296-302. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0763-1. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
8
Incisional hernia repair - laparoscopic or open surgery?切口疝修补术——腹腔镜手术还是开放手术?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009 Nov;91(8):631-6. doi: 10.1308/003588409X12486167521514.
9
Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias.切口疝的开放手术方法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;2008(3):CD006438. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006438.pub2.
10
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: pros and cons compared with open hernia repair.腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术:与开放疝修补术相比的利弊
JSLS. 2008 Apr-Jun;12(2):117-25.

择期腹腔镜切口疝修补术中Mesh固定技术的比较——ReliaTack™与ProTack™(TACKoMesh)——一项双盲随机对照试验。

Comparison of Mesh Fixation Techniques in Elective Laparoscopic Repair of Incisional Hernia-ReliaTack™ v ProTack™ (TACKoMesh) - A double-blind randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Sheen Aali J, Pilkington J James, Baltatzis Minas, Tyurkylmaz Ahmed, Stathakis Panagiotis, Jamdar Saurabh, Siriwardena Ajith K

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Manchester University Foundation NHS trust, M13 9WL, Manchester, UK.

Department of Biomedicine, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2018 Jul 11;18(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0378-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-018-0378-3
PMID:29996841
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6042276/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive incisional hernia repair has been established as a safe and efficient surgical option in most centres worldwide. Laparoscopic technique includes the placement of an intraperitoneal onlay mesh with fixation achieved using spiral tacks or sutures. An additional step is the closure of the fascial defect depending upon its size. Key outcomes in the evaluation of ventral abdominal hernia surgery include postoperative pain, the presence of infection, seroma formation and hernia recurrence. TACKoMESH is a randomised controlled trial that will provide important information on the laparoscopic repair of an incisional hernia; 1) with fascial closure, 2) with an IPOM mesh and 3) comparing the use of an articulating mesh-fixation device that deploys absorbable tacks with a straight-arm mesh-fixation device that deploys non-absorbable tacks.

METHODS

A prospective, single-centre, double-blinded randomised trial, TACKoMESH, will establish whether the use of absorbable compared to non-absorbable tacks in adult patients undergoing elective incisional hernia repair produces a lower rate of pain both immediately and long-term. Eligible and consenting patients will be randomized to surgery with one of two tack-fixation devices and followed up for a minimum one year. Secondary outcomes to be explored include wound infection, seroma formation, hernia recurrence, length of postoperative hospital stay, reoperation rate, operation time, health related quality of life and time to return to normal daily activity.

DISCUSSION

With ongoing debate around the best management of incisional hernia, continued trials that will add substance are both necessary and important. Laparoscopic techniques have become established in reducing hospital stay and rates of infection and report improvement in some patient centered outcomes whilst achieving similarly low rates of recurrence as open surgical techniques. The laparoscopic method with tack fixation has developed a reputation for its tendency to cause post-operative pain. Novel additions to technique, such as intraoperative-sutured closure of a fascial defect, and developments in surgical technology, such as the evolution of composite mesh design and mesh-fixation devices, have brought about new considerations for patient and surgeon. This study will evaluate the efficacy of several new technical considerations in the setting of elective laparoscopic incisional hernia repair.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Name of registry - ClinicalTrials.gov Registration number: NCT03434301 . Retrospectively registered on 15th February 2018.

摘要

背景

在全球大多数医疗中心,微创切口疝修补术已被确立为一种安全有效的手术选择。腹腔镜技术包括放置腹膜内补片,并使用螺旋钉或缝线进行固定。根据筋膜缺损大小,还需进行额外的筋膜缺损闭合步骤。腹前壁疝手术评估的关键结果包括术后疼痛、感染情况、血清肿形成和疝复发。TACKoMESH是一项随机对照试验,将提供关于切口疝腹腔镜修补术的重要信息:1)进行筋膜闭合;2)使用腹膜内补片修补术(IPOM)补片;3)比较使用可部署可吸收钉的关节式补片固定装置与使用不可吸收钉的直臂式补片固定装置。

方法

一项前瞻性、单中心、双盲随机试验TACKoMESH,将确定在接受择期切口疝修补术的成年患者中,使用可吸收钉与不可吸收钉相比,是否能在近期和长期产生更低的疼痛发生率。符合条件并同意参与的患者将被随机分配接受两种钉固定装置之一的手术,并随访至少一年。有待探索的次要结果包括伤口感染、血清肿形成、疝复发、术后住院时间、再次手术率、手术时间、健康相关生活质量以及恢复正常日常活动的时间。

讨论

围绕切口疝的最佳治疗方法仍在持续争论,继续开展有实质意义的试验既必要又重要。腹腔镜技术在缩短住院时间和降低感染率方面已得到确立,并且在一些以患者为中心的结果方面有所改善,同时疝复发率与开放手术技术相当。采用钉固定的腹腔镜方法因易导致术后疼痛而闻名。技术上的新进展,如术中缝合筋膜缺损,以及手术技术的发展,如复合补片设计和补片固定装置的演变,给患者和外科医生带来了新的思考。本研究将评估在择期腹腔镜切口疝修补术中几种新技术考量的疗效。

试验注册

注册机构名称 - ClinicalTrials.gov 注册号:NCT03434301。于2018年2月15日进行回顾性注册。