Su Hang, Zhu Hong-Mei, Li Ling-Ping, Du Ze, Zeng Yang, Hu Ting, Zhang Zhu, Liu Shan-Ling, Wang He
Department of Prenatal Diagnosis of Obstetrics and Gynecology,West China Second University Hospital,Chengdu 610041,China.
Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children,Ministry of Education,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,China.
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2018 Mar;49(2):226-230.
To assess the accuracy and discuss the feasibility of KaryoLite bacterial artificial chromosome on beads (KL-BoBs) and quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) in genetic testing of products of conception (POC) by comparing with the chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) test results.
Eighty-one cases of abortion samples were collected in the prenatal diagnosis center of West China Second University Hospital in Sichuan University from May to August 2016,including 61 cases of placenta tissues,19 cases of fetal muscle tissues and 1 case of fetal liver tissue. KL-BoBs and QF-PCR were used to detect the samples. The results were compared with those of CMA test to evaluate the accuracy of KL-BoBs and QF-PCR.
Of the 81 POC samples,the results of 70 samples tested by KL-BoBs was consistent with that of CMA. Among them,36 cases were normal karyotype and 34 cases were abnormal karyotypes (aneuploidy). Triploid could not been detected by KL-BoBs (the results were shown 2 cases were normal karyotype and 5 cases were aneuploidy),whereas CMA and QF-PCR could be detected. Copy number variation of small segments could not been detected by KL-Bobs. Four cases of copy number variationwere detected by CMA.Compared with CMA,the positive coincident rate of KL-BoBs combined with QF-PCR was 91.1% (41/45),the negative coincidence rate was 100% (36/36). The accuracy rate of KL-BoBs was 86.4% (70/81),the false positive was 0% and the false negative was 13.3% (6/45). Whereas both KL-BoBs and QF-PCR were simultaneously detected,the accuracy rate would be improved to 95.1% (77/81).
The accuracy rate of KL-BoBs combined with QF-PCR was high for testing early pregnancy abortion tissue. It can be used as a first-tier test.
通过与染色体微阵列分析(CMA)检测结果进行比较,评估核型Lite细菌人工染色体微珠芯片(KL-BoBs)和定量荧光聚合酶链反应(QF-PCR)在妊娠产物(POC)基因检测中的准确性,并探讨其可行性。
2016年5月至8月,在四川大学华西第二医院产前诊断中心收集81例流产样本,其中胎盘组织61例、胎儿肌肉组织19例、胎儿肝脏组织1例。采用KL-BoBs和QF-PCR检测样本。将结果与CMA检测结果进行比较,以评估KL-BoBs和QF-PCR的准确性。
81例POC样本中,KL-BoBs检测的70例样本结果与CMA检测结果一致。其中,36例为正常核型,34例为异常核型(非整倍体)。KL-BoBs无法检测出三倍体(结果显示2例为正常核型,5例为非整倍体),而CMA和QF-PCR可以检测出。KL-Bobs无法检测出小片段拷贝数变异。CMA检测出4例拷贝数变异。与CMA相比,KL-BoBs联合QF-PCR的阳性符合率为91.1%(41/45),阴性符合率为100%(36/36)。KL-BoBs的准确率为86.4%(70/81),假阳性为0%,假阴性为13.3%(6/45)。而同时进行KL-BoBs和QF-PCR检测时,准确率可提高到95.1%(77/81)。
KL-BoBs联合QF-PCR检测早期妊娠流产组织的准确率较高。可作为一线检测方法。