• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证 3.0 版乳腺癌遗传学转诊筛查工具(B-RST™)。

Validation of Version 3.0 of the Breast Cancer Genetics Referral Screening Tool (B-RST™).

机构信息

Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2019 Jan;21(1):181-184. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0020-x. Epub 2018 May 8.

DOI:10.1038/s41436-018-0020-x
PMID:29740170
Abstract

PURPOSE

Despite increased awareness of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer among clinicians and the public, many BRCA1/2 mutation carriers remain unaware of their risk status. The Breast Cancer Genetics Referral Screening Tool (B-RST™) was created and validated to easily identify individuals at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer for referral to cancer genetics services. The purpose of this study was to revise B-RST™ to maximize sensitivity against BRCA1/2 mutation status.

METHODS

We analyzed pedigrees of 277 individuals who had undergone BRCA1/2 testing to determine modifications to the B-RST™ 2.0 algorithm that would maximize sensitivity for mutations, while maintaining simplicity. We used McNemar's chi-square test to compare validation measures between the revised version (3.0) and the 2.0 version.

RESULTS

Algorithmic changes made to B-RST™ 2.0 increased the sensitivity against BRCA1/2 mutation analysis from 71.1 to 94.0% (P < 0.0001). While specificity decreased, all screen-positive individuals were appropriate for cancer genetics referral, the primary purpose of the tool.

CONCLUSION

Despite calls for BRCA1/2 population screening, there remains a critical need to identify those most at risk who should receive cancer genetics services. B-RST™ version 3.0 demonstrates high sensitivity for BRCA1/2 mutations, yet remains a simple and quick screening tool for at-risk individuals.

摘要

目的

尽管临床医生和公众对遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌的认识有所提高,但许多 BRCA1/2 突变携带者仍然不知道自己的风险状况。乳腺癌遗传学转诊筛查工具(B-RST™)是为了方便识别遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险增加的个体,以便转介至癌症遗传学服务机构而创建和验证的。本研究的目的是修改 B-RST™,以最大限度地提高对 BRCA1/2 突变状态的敏感性。

方法

我们分析了 277 名接受 BRCA1/2 检测的个体的家族史,以确定对 B-RST™2.0 算法的修改,从而在保持简单性的同时最大限度地提高对突变的敏感性。我们使用 McNemar 的卡方检验比较了修订版(3.0 版)和 2.0 版的验证指标。

结果

对 B-RST™2.0 的算法更改将对 BRCA1/2 突变分析的敏感性从 71.1%提高到 94.0%(P<0.0001)。虽然特异性降低,但所有筛查阳性的个体都适合癌症遗传学转诊,这是该工具的主要目的。

结论

尽管呼吁进行 BRCA1/2 人群筛查,但仍迫切需要识别那些应接受癌症遗传学服务的高危个体。B-RST™3.0 版对 BRCA1/2 突变具有高敏感性,但仍然是一种简单快捷的高危个体筛查工具。

相似文献

1
Validation of Version 3.0 of the Breast Cancer Genetics Referral Screening Tool (B-RST™).验证 3.0 版乳腺癌遗传学转诊筛查工具(B-RST™)。
Genet Med. 2019 Jan;21(1):181-184. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0020-x. Epub 2018 May 8.
2
Evaluation of a breast/ovarian cancer genetics referral screening tool in a mammography population.在乳腺/卵巢癌遗传咨询筛查工具在乳腺 X 线摄影人群中的应用评估。
Genet Med. 2009 Nov;11(11):783-9. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181b9b04a.
3
Impact of Implementing B-RST to Screen for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer on Risk Perception and Genetic Counseling Uptake Among Women in an Academic Safety Net Hospital.在学术保障医院中实施 B-RST 筛查遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌对女性风险认知和遗传咨询参与的影响。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2019 Aug;19(4):e547-e555. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2019.02.014. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
4
Comparison between CaGene 5.1 and 6.0 for BRCA1/2 mutation prediction: a retrospective study of 150 BRCA1/2 genetic tests in 517 families with breast/ovarian cancer.CaGene 5.1与6.0在BRCA1/2突变预测方面的比较:对517个乳腺癌/卵巢癌家庭中150次BRCA1/2基因检测的回顾性研究。
J Hum Genet. 2017 Mar;62(3):379-387. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2016.138. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
5
BRCA1 and BRCA2 unclassified variants and missense polymorphisms in Algerian breast/ovarian cancer families.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 未分类变异体及错义多态性在阿尔及利亚乳腺癌/卵巢癌家族中的研究。
Dis Markers. 2012;32(6):343-53. doi: 10.3233/DMA-2012-0893.
6
Genetic screening results of individuals with high risk BRCA-related breast/ovarian cancer in Trakya region of Turkey.土耳其特拉基亚地区高危 BRCA 相关乳腺癌/卵巢癌个体的遗传筛查结果。
J BUON. 2020 May-Jun;25(3):1337-1347.
7
Five screening-detected breast cancer cases in initially disease-free BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers.5 例在最初无疾病的 BRCA1 或 BRCA2 突变携带者中经筛查检出的乳腺癌病例。
Breast Cancer. 2019 Nov;26(6):846-851. doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-00971-6. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
8
Further development and evaluation of a breast/ovarian cancer genetics referral screening tool.乳腺癌/卵巢癌遗传学转诊筛查工具的进一步开发与评估
Genet Med. 2010 Apr;12(4):240. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181d4bc3a.
9
Effect of Oophorectomy on Survival After Breast Cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 基因突变携带者乳腺癌术后卵巢切除术对生存的影响。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Jun;1(3):306-13. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0658.
10
Implementing a screening tool for identifying patients at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a statewide initiative.实施一种用于识别遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌高危患者的筛查工具:一项全州范围的倡议。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Oct;21(10):3342-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3921-1. Epub 2014 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of an electronic patient-facing cancer family history tool in medically underserved populations.面向患者的电子癌症家族史工具在医疗服务不足人群中的可行性。
Genet Med Open. 2024 Jun 25;2:101860. doi: 10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101860. eCollection 2024.
2
A Scoping Review of Personalized, Interactive, Web-Based Clinical Decision Tools Available for Breast Cancer Prevention and Screening in the United States.美国可用于乳腺癌预防和筛查的个性化、交互式、基于网络的临床决策工具的范围综述
MDM Policy Pract. 2024 Mar 17;9(1):23814683241236511. doi: 10.1177/23814683241236511. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.
3
Risk management actions following genetic testing in the Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM) Study: A prospective cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer in women: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.女性 BRCA 相关癌症的风险评估、遗传咨询和基因检测:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Feb 18;160(4):271-81. doi: 10.7326/M13-2747.
遗传检测后的风险管理措施在癌症健康评估惠及众多人(CHARM)研究中的应用:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Cancer Med. 2023 Sep;12(18):19112-19125. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6485. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
4
Engaging Patient Advisory Committees to Inform a Genomic Cancer Risk Study: Lessons for Future Efforts.参与患者顾问委员会以提供信息支持癌症风险基因研究:对未来工作的启示。
Perm J. 2022 Jun 29;26(2):28-39. doi: 10.7812/TPP/21.091. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
5
Literacy-adapted, electronic family history assessment for genetics referral in primary care: patient user insights from qualitative interviews.适用于初级保健中遗传学转诊的、经过文化水平调整的电子家族史评估:来自定性访谈的患者用户见解
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2022 Jun 10;20(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13053-022-00231-3.
6
Retrospective assessment of barriers and access to genetic services for hereditary cancer syndromes in an integrated health care delivery system.在综合医疗服务体系中对遗传性癌症综合征的遗传服务障碍及可及性进行回顾性评估。
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2022 Feb 10;20(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13053-022-00213-5.
7
Feasibility of a Traceback Approach for Using Pathology Specimens to Facilitate Genetic Testing in the Genetic Risk Analysis in Ovarian Cancer (GRACE) Study Protocol.在卵巢癌遗传风险分析(GRACE)研究方案中,利用病理标本采用追溯法促进基因检测的可行性。
J Pers Med. 2021 Nov 13;11(11):1194. doi: 10.3390/jpm11111194.
8
Creating accessible Spanish language materials for Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research consortium genomic projects: challenges and lessons learned.为临床测序证据生成研究联盟基因组项目创建西班牙语无障碍材料:挑战和经验教训。
Per Med. 2021 Sep;18(5):441-454. doi: 10.2217/pme-2020-0075. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
9
Leveraging Health Information Technology to Collect Family Cancer History: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.利用健康信息技术收集家族癌症病史:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021 Jun;5:775-788. doi: 10.1200/CCI.21.00004.
10
Barriers to family history knowledge and family communication among LGBTQ+ individuals in the context of hereditary cancer risk assessment.LGBTQ+ 个体在遗传性癌症风险评估背景下的家族病史知识和家族沟通障碍。
J Genet Couns. 2022 Feb;31(1):230-241. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1476. Epub 2021 Jul 23.