Liu Dong Wei, Tu Ying, Fang Yun Ting
Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2017 Jul 18;28(7):2353-2360. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201707.036.
In the past several decades, a variety of methods have been developed for measuring the isotopic composition of ammonium (δN) and nitrate (δN and δO). This review summarized the advantages and disadvantages of these methods. Nowadays, the most popular method for measu-ring δN of ammonium is the combined hypobromite (BrO) and hydroxylamine (NHOH) me-thod, while for δN and δO of nitrate is the denitrifier method and the sodium azide (NaN) me-thod. These methods convert NH or NO into nitrous oxide (NO) and measure its isotopic compositions, with higher analytical precision because of the lower background concentration of atmospheric NO. Accordingly, these methods are suitable for the samples with lower N concentration, and normally require 10-60 nmol N. The development of new methods for measuring N isotopic composition has greatly stimulated the studies in nitrogen cycling worldwide.
在过去几十年里,已经开发出多种用于测量铵(δN)和硝酸盐(δN和δO)同位素组成的方法。本综述总结了这些方法的优缺点。如今,测量铵δN最常用的方法是次溴酸盐(BrO)和羟胺(NHOH)联合法,而测量硝酸盐δN和δO的方法是反硝化法和叠氮化钠(NaN)法。这些方法将NH或NO转化为一氧化二氮(N₂O)并测量其同位素组成,由于大气中N₂O的背景浓度较低,分析精度更高。因此,这些方法适用于低N浓度的样品,通常需要10 - 60 nmol的N。测量N同位素组成新方法的发展极大地推动了全球氮循环的研究。