• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于比较两个二项比例的最佳安慰剂反应率。

Optimal placebo response rates for comparing two binomial proportions.

作者信息

Day S J

机构信息

Respiratory Unit, Hospital for Sick Children, London, U.K.

出版信息

Stat Med. 1988 Nov;7(11):1187-94. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780071112.

DOI:10.1002/sim.4780071112
PMID:2974173
Abstract

This paper considers the problem of comparing proportions in clinical trials where two parallel groups are studied. The question of what will happen to the response rate of an active therapy if some external factor affects the placebo rate is asked and two different, but similar, answers are proposed. Assuming either a logistic or probit model has substantial influence on the sample size required to detect differences and optimal comparisons are suggested. The idea is illustrated by a clinical trial of treatment for peptic ulcer and suggestions for other possible applications are presented.

摘要

本文探讨了在研究两个平行组的临床试验中比较比例的问题。提出了如果某个外部因素影响安慰剂率,活性疗法的反应率会发生什么变化的问题,并给出了两个不同但相似的答案。假设逻辑模型或概率模型对检测差异所需的样本量有重大影响,并提出了最优比较方法。通过一项消化性溃疡治疗的临床试验来说明这一理念,并给出了其他可能应用的建议。

相似文献

1
Optimal placebo response rates for comparing two binomial proportions.用于比较两个二项比例的最佳安慰剂反应率。
Stat Med. 1988 Nov;7(11):1187-94. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780071112.
2
Considerations for peptic ulcer trials.消化性溃疡试验的注意事项。
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1987;127:55-9. doi: 10.3109/00365528709090952.
3
Ulcer complications during short-term therapy of duodenal ulcer with active agents and placebo.十二指肠溃疡短期治疗中使用活性剂和安慰剂时的溃疡并发症。
Gastroenterology. 1986 Feb;90(2):478-81. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(86)90950-9.
4
Controlled trial of liquid monopolar electrocoagulation in bleeding peptic ulcers.液体单极电凝治疗消化性溃疡出血的对照试验
Am J Gastroenterol. 1985 Nov;80(11):853-7.
5
Controlled trial of small bipolar probe in bleeding peptic ulcers.
Lancet. 1986 Mar 1;1(8479):464-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)92928-4.
6
[Controlled therapeutic trials: elaboration of the protocol].[对照治疗试验:方案制定]
Rev Prat. 1983 Apr 1;33(19):963-4, 967-8, 971-3.
7
Per-endoscopic bipolar diathermy coagulation of visible vessels using a 3.2 mm probe--a randomised clinical trial.
Endoscopy. 1987 Jul;19(4):160-3. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1018269.
8
The role of a placebo-treated control group in combination drug trials.安慰剂治疗对照组在联合药物试验中的作用。
Control Clin Trials. 1989 Mar;10(1):97-107. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90021-4.
9
When does the failure to find a difference mean that there is none?未能发现差异在何时意味着不存在差异?
Arch Ophthalmol. 1989 Jul;107(7):1034-40. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1989.01070020096040.
10
Controlled trial of heater probe treatment in bleeding peptic ulcers.热探头治疗出血性消化性溃疡的对照试验
Br J Surg. 1989 Jun;76(6):541-4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800760606.