Sreenivasan P K, Prasad K V V, Javali S B
Colgate-Palmolive Technology Center Piscataway New Jersey 08855 USA.
Department of Community Dentistry SDM College of Dental Sciences Dharwad India.
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2016 Jan 28;2(1):6-17. doi: 10.1002/cre2.15. eCollection 2016 Jun.
This cross-sectional survey study evaluated oral hygiene habits in conjunction with whole mouth examinations for dental plaque and gingivitis among adults in India. Subjects across several age groups who provided informed consent [220 male and 158 female (mean age 30.9 years)] were enrolled. All enrolled subjects were interviewed for oral hygiene practices and evaluated by the Turesky modification of the Quigley-Hein and the Löe-Silness methods for dental plaque and gingivitis, respectively. Evaluations included oral hygiene parameters, prevalence of dental plaque and gingivitis, and regional differences within the dentition for dental plaque and gingivitis. Results from this study indicate that most subjects (97%) utilized a toothbrush and toothpaste for oral hygiene with a majority (92%) using their right hand to brush their teeth. While 29% reported two or more episodes of daily oral hygiene, a majority (53%) brushed their teeth once daily. Utilization of dental floss and mouthwashes were reported by approximately 1% of this population, and most (73%) reported no dental visits in the preceding 5 years. Whole mouth plaque and gingival scores (average ± standard deviation) for this population were 2.47 ± 0.55 and 1.19 ± 0.31, respectively, with no significant differences between either gender (P > 0.05). Significant correlations (r > 0.44) were observed between plaque and gingival scores for the entire sample, either gender or between age groups (P < 0.001). Analyses indicate that anterior teeth demonstrated lower average scores for dental plaque and gingivitis than posterior and molar regions (P < 0.05). Education was associated with higher plaque and gingival scores: plaque scores [odds ratios; 95% confidence interval; 1.23; 1.01-1.50 and gingival scores odds ratios 1.25; 1.02-1.54]. In summary, results from this study demonstrate the prevalence of dental plaque and gingivitis in the general population and their relationships with demographic characteristics. They reinforce examinations of posterior regions that consistently harbor more plaque and corresponding gingivitis in evaluations of oral health.
这项横断面调查研究评估了印度成年人的口腔卫生习惯,并结合全口牙菌斑和牙龈炎检查。招募了多个年龄组中提供知情同意书的受试者[220名男性和158名女性(平均年龄30.9岁)]。所有入选受试者均接受了口腔卫生习惯访谈,并分别采用Quigley-Hein法的Turesky改良法和Löe-Silness法对牙菌斑和牙龈炎进行评估。评估内容包括口腔卫生参数、牙菌斑和牙龈炎的患病率,以及牙列中牙菌斑和牙龈炎的区域差异。该研究结果表明,大多数受试者(97%)使用牙刷和牙膏进行口腔卫生护理,大多数(92%)用右手刷牙。虽然29%的受试者报告每天进行两次或更多次口腔卫生护理,但大多数(53%)每天刷牙一次。该人群中约1%的人报告使用牙线和漱口水,大多数(73%)报告在过去5年中没有看过牙医。该人群的全口牙菌斑和牙龈评分(平均值±标准差)分别为2.47±0.55和1.19±0.31,两性之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。在整个样本、任何性别或年龄组之间,牙菌斑和牙龈评分之间均观察到显著相关性(r>0.44)(P<0.001)。分析表明,前牙的牙菌斑和牙龈炎平均评分低于后牙和磨牙区域(P<0.05)。受教育程度与较高的牙菌斑和牙龈评分相关:牙菌斑评分[比值比;95%置信区间;1.23;1.01-1.50]和牙龈评分比值比[1.25;1.02-1.54]。总之,该研究结果表明了普通人群中牙菌斑和牙龈炎的患病率及其与人口统计学特征的关系。它们强化了在口腔健康评估中对始终含有更多牙菌斑和相应牙龈炎的后牙区域的检查。