Hunley Keith, Edgar Heather, Healy Meghan, Mosley Carmen, Cabana Graciela S, West Frankie
2 Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
1 Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Hum Biol. 2017 Jul;89(3):217-228.
In this study, we evaluated the extent to which regional history has shaped the social identity nomenclature in New Mexicans of Spanish-speaking descent (NMSD). We asked 507 NMSD to list the social-identity terms they used to describe themselves and their parents, and we examined the correspondence between these choices and family ties to the region, birthplace, and continental ancestry. NMSD frequently identified using the regional terms "Nuevomexicano/a" (15%) and "Spanish" (12%). These individuals reported family ties to the region that predate New Mexican statehood. They and their parents were frequently born in New Mexico, frequently chose the other of the two terms as a secondary descriptor, and frequently ascribed one of the two terms to their parents. About 10% of NMSD identified as "Mexican American" and "Mexican." About 25% of these individuals, and more than half of their parents, were born in Mexico. They also frequently chose the other of the two terms as a secondary descriptor and frequently ascribed one of the two terms to their parents. Compared to NMSD who identified as "Mexican" and "Mexican American," individuals who identified as "Nuevomexicano/a" and "Spanish" had higher European ancestry and lower Native American and African ancestry. Our results also suggest that the term "Hispanic," frequently chosen as both a primary and secondary social identity term by NMSD, may, as it continues to rise in prominence, mask more deeply rooted and potential socially relevant aspects of social identity in New Mexico. More broadly, these results indicate that regional history influences social identity nomenclatures in ways that are potentially incompatible with US Office of Management and Budget standards. This incompatibility may adversely affect the ability of researchers in the social sciences to assess the causes of social inequality and health disparities in individuals of Spanish-speaking descent in different regions of the United States. We argue that future studies would benefit from more fine-grained, region-specific analyses of social identity.
在本研究中,我们评估了地域历史在多大程度上塑造了讲西班牙语的新墨西哥人(NMSD)的社会身份命名。我们让507名NMSD列出他们用来描述自己和父母的社会身份术语,并研究了这些选择与和该地区的家族联系、出生地以及大陆血统之间的对应关系。NMSD经常使用地域术语“新墨西哥人”(15%)和“西班牙人”(12%)来自我认同。这些人报告了其家族与该地区的联系早于新墨西哥州成立的时间。他们自己及其父母经常出生在新墨西哥州,经常选择这两个术语中的另一个作为次要描述词,并经常将这两个术语中的一个用于描述他们的父母。约10%的NMSD将自己认同为“墨西哥裔美国人”和“墨西哥人”。这些人中约25%以及他们一半以上的父母出生在墨西哥。他们也经常选择这两个术语中的另一个作为次要描述词,并经常将这两个术语中的一个用于描述他们的父母。与认同为“墨西哥人”和“墨西哥裔美国人”的NMSD相比,认同为“新墨西哥人”和“西班牙人”的个体具有更高的欧洲血统,以及更低的美洲原住民和非洲血统。我们的研究结果还表明,“西班牙裔”这个术语,NMSD经常将其选作主要和次要的社会身份术语,随着它的日益突出,可能会掩盖新墨西哥州社会身份中更深层次且可能与社会相关的方面。更广泛地说,这些结果表明地域历史以可能不符合美国管理和预算办公室标准的方式影响社会身份命名。这种不兼容性可能会对社会科学领域的研究人员评估美国不同地区讲西班牙语人群的社会不平等和健康差距成因的能力产生不利影响。我们认为未来的研究将受益于对社会身份进行更细致、针对特定地区的分析。