Rew Maggie, Lake Helen, Brownlee-Moore Kayleigh
Nurse Advisor, B.Braun Medical Ltd.
Clinical Nurse Specialist Urology/Stoma, B.Braun Medical Ltd, Honorary Nurse Specialist, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust.
Br J Nurs. 2018 May 10;27(9):S18-S25. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2018.27.9.S18.
Male catheterisation can be difficult to perform, especially in patients with an enlarged prostate gland or other potentially obstructive conditions in the lower urinary tract. Repeated and unsuccessful catheterisations, as well as causing trauma, pain and distress, can cause other conditions such as urethral strictures and 'false passages' (when the catheter is pushed through the urethral wall instead of passing down the urethra), which then require more costly interventions to correct. With an increasingly ageing population these complications are expected to rise, putting added strain on an already stretched health service. This article discusses the use of the Coudé (or Tiemann) tip catheter in patients presenting with these challenging catheterisations and, in particular, male patients performing intermittent self-catheterisation. Device design can help overcome obstructive difficulties, making catheterisation easier, less traumatic and more comfortable for the patient. A survey of 200 nurses working in the urology and continence field was undertaken to understand their awareness and usage of Coudé/Tiemann tip catheters in practice. It was found that many nurses and doctors were unaware of this type of catheter and its advantages and therefore did not use or offer it as an alternative to the more commonly used straight-tipped catheter. In the vast majority of cases when Tiemann tip catheters were used this occurred after failure with a straight-tipped catheter, or they were used with patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia or other potentially obstructive conditions. In many cases, the catheterisation was consultant initiated, despite the fact that intermittent self-catheterisation is instigated and taught mainly by nurses. This survey highlighted the need for better education for nurses and doctors in assessing the alternative catheter tips available to ensure successful catheterisation on first attempt.
男性导尿操作可能会很困难,尤其是对于前列腺肿大或下尿路存在其他潜在梗阻性疾病的患者。反复导尿失败,不仅会造成创伤、疼痛和痛苦,还可能引发其他病症,如尿道狭窄和“假道”(即导尿管穿过尿道壁而非顺着尿道下行),而这些情况随后需要更昂贵的干预措施来纠正。随着人口老龄化加剧,预计这些并发症会增多,给本就不堪重负的医疗服务带来更大压力。本文探讨了弯头(或蒂曼氏)导尿管在面临这些具有挑战性导尿情况的患者中的应用,特别是在进行间歇性自我导尿的男性患者中。器械设计有助于克服梗阻困难,使导尿操作对患者来说更轻松、创伤更小且更舒适。我们对200名从事泌尿外科和尿失禁领域工作的护士进行了一项调查,以了解她们在实际工作中对弯头/蒂曼氏导尿管的认知和使用情况。结果发现,许多护士和医生并不了解这种类型的导尿管及其优势,因此没有将其作为更常用的直头导尿管的替代选择来使用或推荐。在绝大多数使用蒂曼氏导尿管的情况下,都是在直头导尿管导尿失败后才使用,或者是用于患有良性前列腺增生或其他潜在梗阻性疾病的患者。在很多情况下,导尿操作是由顾问发起的,尽管间歇性自我导尿主要是由护士发起并教授的。这项调查凸显了对护士和医生进行更好教育的必要性,以便他们能够评估可用的替代导尿管尖端,确保首次导尿就能成功。