Subramanian Vaidyanathan, Soni Bakulesh Madhusudan
Northwest Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport and Formby District General Hospital, Southport, UK.
Med Devices (Auckl). 2024 Apr 16;17:143-150. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S457784. eCollection 2024.
We used a Urethrotech catheterisation device in 57 male patients with spinal cord injury, in whom urethral catheterisation was unsuccessful or previous catheterisation was difficult.
Urethrotech catheter could be inserted in 51 patients. No patient developed urinary tract infection. In one patient, the guidewire could not be introduced into the bladder, and a coude Foley catheter was inserted. In two patients, the guidewire was inserted into the bladder, but a 16 CH catheter could not be advanced over the guidewire. Emergency suprapubic cystostomy was performed in one case; in the other, urethral stricture was dilated; a size 12 CH catheter was inserted. In three patients, the guidewire curled back into the urethra because of severe spasm of the urethral sphincter. Catheterisation with a Tiemann catheter was successful after administration of diazepam and/or stretching of the anal sphincter by another health professional, which caused reflex relaxation of the urethral sphincter. Complications of Urethrotech catheterisation included urethral bleeding, haematuria, pain, doubling back of the guidewire due to spasm of the urethral sphincter or from an empty bladder. We adopted variations in technique, eg filling the bladder with saline prior to catheterisation when feasible, insertion of the guidewire by the side of the old catheter, use of Tiemann tip catheters, administration of antibiotics, diazepam to control spasms, nifedipine to control autonomic dysreflexia, analgesics, stretching of the anal sphincter to induce reflex relaxation of the urethral sphincter, urgent imaging studies to confirm correct positioning of the catheter, omitting anticoagulants and monitoring patients, who developed bleeding.
Use of Urethrotech in spinal injury patients warranted adaptations to the technique, which required expertise, experience, and backup facilities. To ensure patient safety, Urethrotech catheter should be used in a hospital setting, and by medical personnel with experience in the management of spinal cord injury patients.
我们对57例脊髓损伤男性患者使用了Urethrotech导尿装置,这些患者尿道插管不成功或既往插管困难。
51例患者成功插入Urethrotech导管。无患者发生尿路感染。1例患者导丝无法插入膀胱,遂插入了弯头Foley导管。2例患者导丝插入膀胱,但16 CH导管无法沿导丝推进。1例患者进行了急诊耻骨上膀胱造瘘术;另1例患者尿道狭窄扩张,插入了12 CH导管。3例患者因尿道括约肌严重痉挛,导丝卷曲回尿道。在给予地西泮和/或由另一名医护人员拉伸肛门括约肌导致尿道括约肌反射性松弛后,使用Tiemann导管插管成功。Urethrotech导尿的并发症包括尿道出血、血尿、疼痛、因尿道括约肌痉挛或膀胱空虚导致导丝折返。我们采用了技术上的变通方法,例如在可行时插管前用生理盐水充盈膀胱、在旧导管旁插入导丝、使用Tiemann头导管、给予抗生素、使用地西泮控制痉挛、使用硝苯地平控制自主神经反射异常、使用镇痛药、拉伸肛门括约肌以诱导尿道括约肌反射性松弛、进行紧急影像学检查以确认导管正确定位、停用抗凝剂并对出血患者进行监测。
在脊髓损伤患者中使用Urethrotech需要对技术进行调整,这需要专业知识、经验和备用设备。为确保患者安全,应在医院环境中由有脊髓损伤患者管理经验 的医务人员使用Urethrotech导管。