Division of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona; Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona.
Division of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona; Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018 Aug;121(2):218-228. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 May 16.
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, inflammatory disease of the esophagus that currently requires repeated endoscopic biopsies for diagnosis and monitoring because no reliable noninvasive markers have been identified.
To identify promising minimally invasive EoE biomarkers and remaining gaps in biomarker validation.
We performed a systematic review of EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science from inception to June 6, 2017. Studies were included if patients met the 2007 consensus criteria for EoE diagnosis, a minimally invasive biomarker was assessed, and the study included at least 1 control for comparison.
The search identified 2094 studies, with 234 reviewed at full-text level, and 49 included in the analysis (20 adult, 19 pediatric, 7 pediatric and adult, and 3 not stated). Most (26 of 49) were published after 2014. Thirty-five studies included healthy controls, 9 analyzed atopic controls, and 29 compared samples from patients with active and inactive EoE. Minimally invasive biomarkers were obtained from peripheral blood (n = 41 studies), sponge or string samples (n = 3), oral or throat swab secretions (n = 2), breath condensate (n = 2), stool (n = 2), and urine (n = 2). The most commonly reported biomarkers were peripheral blood eosinophils (n = 16), blood and string eosinophil granule proteins (n = 14), and eosinophil surface or intracellular markers (n = 12). EoE biomarkers distinguished active EoE from healthy controls in 23 studies, atopic controls in 2 studies, and inactive EoE controls in 20 studies.
Several promising minimally invasive biomarkers for EoE have emerged; however, few are able to differentiate EoE from other atopic diseases.
嗜酸性食管炎(EoE)是一种慢性、炎症性食管疾病,目前需要反复进行内镜活检以进行诊断和监测,因为尚未发现可靠的非侵入性标志物。
确定有前途的微创性 EoE 生物标志物,并确定生物标志物验证方面的遗留差距。
我们对 EMBASE、Ovid MEDLINE、PubMed 和 Web of Science 进行了系统检索,检索时间从建库至 2017 年 6 月 6 日。如果患者符合 2007 年 EoE 诊断共识标准、评估了微创性生物标志物且研究纳入了至少 1 个对照组进行比较,则纳入研究。
检索共确定了 2094 项研究,其中 234 项进行了全文评估,49 项纳入分析(20 项成人研究、19 项儿童研究、7 项成人和儿童研究、3 项未说明)。大多数(49 项中的 26 项)发表于 2014 年以后。35 项研究纳入了健康对照组,9 项分析了特应性对照组,29 项比较了活动期和非活动期 EoE 患者的样本。微创性生物标志物来自外周血(n=41 项研究)、海绵或线样标本(n=3)、口腔或咽喉拭子分泌物(n=2)、呼出气冷凝物(n=2)、粪便(n=2)和尿液(n=2)。报告最多的生物标志物是外周血嗜酸粒细胞(n=16)、血液和线样标本嗜酸粒细胞颗粒蛋白(n=14)以及嗜酸粒细胞表面或细胞内标志物(n=12)。23 项研究中 EoE 生物标志物可区分活动期 EoE 与健康对照组,2 项研究中可区分特应性对照组,20 项研究中可区分非活动期 EoE 对照组。
已经出现了几种有前途的微创性 EoE 生物标志物,但很少有能将 EoE 与其他特应性疾病区分开的生物标志物。