• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 PERCIST 标准评估新辅助化疗治疗乳腺癌的疗效:日本多中心研究。

Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer judged by PERCIST - multicenter study in Japan.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan.

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Miwa, Kurashiki, Okayama, 710-8602, Japan.

出版信息

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Sep;45(10):1661-1671. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4008-1. Epub 2018 May 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00259-018-4008-1
PMID:29754160
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate therapeutic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and predict breast cancer recurrence using Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-nine breast cancer patients underwent fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) before and after NAC prior to planned surgical resection. Pathological complete response (pCR) of the primary tumor was evaluated using PERCIST, while effects of clinicopathological factors on progression-free survival (PFS) were examined using log-rank and Cox methods.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients and 54 primary tumors were evaluated. Complete metabolic response (CMR), partial metabolic response, stable metabolic disease, and progressive metabolic disease were seen in 45, 7, 3, and 1 patients, respectively, and 43, 7, 3, and 1 primary tumors, respectively. Eighteen (33.3%) of the 54 primary tumors showed pCR. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of PERCIST to predict pCR were 100% (18/18), 30.6% (11/36), 41.9% (18/43), 100% (11/11), and 53.7% (29/54), respectively. An optimal percent decrease in peak standardized uptake value for a primary tumor corrected for lean body mass (SULpeak) of 84.3% was found to have a sensitivity of 77.8% (14/18), specificity of 77.8% (28/36), PPV of 63.6% (14/22), NPV of 87.5% (28/32), and accuracy of 77.8% (42/54). Seven (12.5%) of the 56 patients developed recurrent disease (median follow-up 28.1 months, range 11.4-96.4 months). CMR (p = 0.031), pCR (p = 0.024), and early TNM stage (p = 0.033) were significantly associated with longer PFS.

CONCLUSION

PERCIST is useful for predicting pathological response and prognosis following NAC in breast cancer patients. However, FDG-PET/CT showed a tendency toward underestimation of the residual tumor, and relatively low specificity and PPV of PERCIST showed that a combination of other imaging modalities would still be needed to predict pCR.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用实体瘤正电子发射断层扫描疗效评价标准(PERCIST)评估新辅助化疗(NAC)的治疗反应,并预测乳腺癌复发。

材料与方法

59 例乳腺癌患者在计划行手术切除前接受了氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(FDG-PET/CT)检查。使用 PERCIST 评估原发肿瘤的病理完全缓解(pCR),使用对数秩和 Cox 方法检查临床病理因素对无进展生存期(PFS)的影响。

结果

对 56 例患者和 54 个原发肿瘤进行了评估。45 例患者的完全代谢缓解(CMR)、部分代谢缓解、稳定代谢疾病和进展性代谢疾病分别为 4 例、7 例、3 例和 1 例,43 例、7 例、3 例和 1 例分别为 43 例、7 例、3 例和 1 例。18 例(33.3%)原发肿瘤出现 pCR。PERCIST 预测 pCR 的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性分别为 100%(18/18)、30.6%(11/36)、41.9%(18/43)、100%(11/11)和 53.7%(29/54)。发现经瘦体重校正后的最大标准化摄取值百分比下降(SULpeak)84.3%是预测 pCR 的最佳截断值,其敏感性为 77.8%(14/18),特异性为 77.8%(28/36),PPV 为 63.6%(14/22),NPV 为 87.5%(28/32),准确性为 77.8%(42/54)。56 例患者中有 7 例(12.5%)发生复发病例(中位随访 28.1 个月,范围 11.4-96.4 个月)。CMR(p=0.031)、pCR(p=0.024)和早期 TNM 分期(p=0.033)与更长的 PFS 显著相关。

结论

PERCIST 可用于预测乳腺癌患者 NAC 后的病理反应和预后。然而,FDG-PET/CT 显示出低估残留肿瘤的趋势,PERCIST 的特异性和 PPV 相对较低,表明仍需要结合其他成像方式来预测 pCR。

相似文献

1
Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer judged by PERCIST - multicenter study in Japan.基于 PERCIST 标准评估新辅助化疗治疗乳腺癌的疗效:日本多中心研究。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Sep;45(10):1661-1671. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4008-1. Epub 2018 May 12.
2
The early prediction of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prognosis: comparison of PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria in breast cancer.新辅助化疗病理反应及预后的早期预测:实体瘤PET反应标准与欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织乳腺癌标准的比较。
Nucl Med Commun. 2020 Mar;41(3):280-287. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001145.
3
Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer assessed with CT and FDG-PET/CT - RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 1.0.CT 和 FDG-PET/CT 评估食管癌患者新辅助化疗的肿瘤反应:RECIST 1.1 与 PERCIST 1.0 比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Apr;101:65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
4
Predicting tumor response and prognosis to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients using PERCIST: a multicenter study in Japan.使用 PERCIST 预测食管鳞癌患者新辅助化疗的肿瘤反应和预后:日本多中心研究。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Oct;48(11):3666-3682. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05365-5. Epub 2021 May 2.
5
Assessment of tumor response to definitive chemoradiotherapy and prognosis prediction in patients with esophageal cancer judged by PET response criteria in solid tumors: multicenter study in Japan.基于实体瘤 PET 应答标准评估食管癌患者放化疗后肿瘤应答及预后预测:日本多中心研究。
Nucl Med Commun. 2020 May;41(5):443-451. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001168.
6
Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy of Breast Cancer.磁共振成像与正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描在乳腺癌新辅助治疗反应评估中的比较。
J Surg Res. 2022 Oct;278:223-232. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.04.063. Epub 2022 May 25.
7
The value of pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy F-18 FDG PET/CT scans in breast cancer: comparison with MRI.新辅助化疗前后F-18 FDG PET/CT扫描在乳腺癌中的价值:与MRI的比较
Acta Radiol. 2018 Jan;59(1):41-49. doi: 10.1177/0284185117705011. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
8
Complete Metabolic Response on Interim F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography to Predict Long-Term Survival in Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.基于中期氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描的完全代谢反应预测接受新辅助化疗的乳腺癌患者的长期生存情况
Oncologist. 2017 May;22(5):526-534. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0334. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
9
Assessment of tumor response to chemoradiotherapy and predicting prognosis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by PERCIST.通过PERCIST评估头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者对放化疗的肿瘤反应并预测预后。
Ann Nucl Med. 2018 Aug;32(7):453-462. doi: 10.1007/s12149-018-1267-7. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
10
Assessment of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer using MRI and FDG-PET/CT-RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 1.0.使用MRI和FDG-PET/CT,依据RECIST 1.1与PERCIST 1.0评估乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗后的肿瘤反应。
Nagoya J Med Sci. 2018 May;80(2):183-197. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.80.2.183.

引用本文的文献

1
Research advances in evaluation methods for neoadjuvant therapy of tumors.肿瘤新辅助治疗评估方法的研究进展
Front Oncol. 2025 May 22;15:1580360. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1580360. eCollection 2025.
2
Accuracy of MRI Versus PET/CT in the Prediction of Treatment Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.MRI与PET/CT在预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗治疗反应中的准确性
Cureus. 2024 Aug 4;16(8):e66114. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66114. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Predictive Value of PERCIST for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Preoperative Induction Therapy - A Multicenter Study in Japan.

本文引用的文献

1
Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer assessed with CT and FDG-PET/CT - RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 1.0.CT 和 FDG-PET/CT 评估食管癌患者新辅助化疗的肿瘤反应:RECIST 1.1 与 PERCIST 1.0 比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Apr;101:65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
2
Molecular Breast Imaging: A Comprehensive Review.分子乳腺成像:全面综述
Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2018 Feb;39(1):60-69. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
3
Is Technetium-99m Sestamibi Imaging Able to Predict Pathologic Nonresponse to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer? A Meta-analysis Evaluating Current Use and Shortcomings.
PERCIST对接受术前诱导治疗的局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的预测价值——日本的一项多中心研究
Cancer Manag Res. 2024 Jul 30;16:965-976. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S464265. eCollection 2024.
4
Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and CT for evaluation of tumor response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy and prognosis prediction in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma.评估不可切除恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗治疗反应及预后预测的 FDG-PET/CT 与 CT 比较。
Oncotarget. 2024 Jun 20;15:408-417. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.28594.
5
Joint EANM-SNMMI guideline on the role of 2-[F]FDG PET/CT in no special type breast cancer : (endorsed by the ACR, ESSO, ESTRO, EUSOBI/ESR, and EUSOMA).EANM-SNMMI 联合指南:2-[F]FDG PET/CT 在非特殊类型乳腺癌中的作用:(由 ACR、ESSO、ESTRO、EUSOBI/ESR 和 EUSOMA 认可)。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024 Jul;51(9):2706-2732. doi: 10.1007/s00259-024-06696-9. Epub 2024 May 14.
6
Innovations in Positron Emission Tomography and State of the Art in the Evaluation of Breast Cancer Treatment Response.正电子发射断层扫描的创新与乳腺癌治疗反应评估的最新技术水平
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 27;13(1):154. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010154.
7
The association between the amino acid transporter LAT1, tumor immunometabolic and proliferative features and menopausal status in breast cancer.乳腺癌中氨基酸转运蛋白 LAT1 与肿瘤免疫代谢和增殖特征及绝经状态的关系。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 11;18(10):e0292678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292678. eCollection 2023.
8
Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma Features Shown by FDG-PET/CT.FDG-PET/CT显示的恶性腹膜间皮瘤特征
Cancer Diagn Progn. 2022 Nov 3;2(6):654-660. doi: 10.21873/cdp.10156. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.
9
Prognostic value of complete metabolic response on ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT after three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer.新辅助化疗 3 周期后 ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT 完全代谢缓解对晚期高级别浆液性卵巢癌的预后价值。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2022 May;33(3):e28. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e28. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
10
Assessment and Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Imaging Modalities and Future Perspectives.乳腺癌新辅助化疗反应的评估与预测:影像学模态比较及未来展望
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 14;13(14):3521. doi: 10.3390/cancers13143521.
锝 99m 甲氧基异丁基异腈成像能否预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗的病理无反应?一项评估当前应用和局限性的荟萃分析。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Feb;18(1):9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
4
The value of pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy F-18 FDG PET/CT scans in breast cancer: comparison with MRI.新辅助化疗前后F-18 FDG PET/CT扫描在乳腺癌中的价值:与MRI的比较
Acta Radiol. 2018 Jan;59(1):41-49. doi: 10.1177/0284185117705011. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
5
Evaluation of the Response to Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using 18F-FDG Positron Emission Mammography Compared With Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET: A Prospective Observational Study.使用 18F-FDG 正电子发射乳房摄影术与全身 18F-FDG PET 评估乳腺癌新辅助化疗的反应:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Clin Nucl Med. 2017 Mar;42(3):169-175. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001497.
6
Methodological aspects of Tc-sestamibi guided biopsy in breast cancer.乳腺癌中锝-司他米比引导活检的方法学方面
Clin Transl Imaging. 2016;4(5):367-376. doi: 10.1007/s40336-016-0201-z. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
7
FDG-PET/CT and MRI for Evaluation of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(FDG-PET/CT)与磁共振成像(MRI)用于评估乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗后的病理反应:诊断准确性研究的荟萃分析
Oncologist. 2016 Aug;21(8):931-9. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0353. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
8
Predictive and prognostic value of FDG-PET/CT imaging and different response evaluation criteria after primary systemic therapy of breast cancer.乳腺癌初次全身治疗后FDG-PET/CT成像的预测和预后价值及不同反应评估标准
Breast Cancer. 2017 Jan;24(1):137-146. doi: 10.1007/s12282-016-0685-4. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
9
Breast cancer detection using high-resolution breast PET compared to whole-body PET or PET/CT.使用高分辨率乳腺 PET 检测乳腺癌与全身 PET 或 PET/CT 比较。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Feb;41(2):260-75. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2553-1. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
10
Sequential (18)F-FDG PET/CT for early prediction of complete pathological response in breast and axilla during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.新辅助化疗期间 18F-FDG PET/CT 连续扫描对预测乳腺和腋窝完全病理缓解的价值。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Jan;41(1):32-40. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2515-7. Epub 2013 Aug 9.