Suppr超能文献

比较分数流动储备和血管内超声指导的干预策略对中间狭窄患者的临床结局的影响(FLAVOUR):一项随机临床试验的原理和设计。

Comparison of Fractional FLow Reserve And Intravascular ultrasound-guided Intervention Strategy for Clinical OUtcomes in Patients with InteRmediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR): Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Institute on Aging, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2018 May;199:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coronary angiography has limitations in defining the ischemia-causing stenotic lesion, especially in cases with intermediate coronary stenosis. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a current standard method to define the presence of ischemia, and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is the most commonly used invasive imaging tool that can provide the lesion geometry and can provide the information on plaque vulnerability. The primary aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of FFR-guided and IVUS-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategies in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis.

TRIAL DESIGN

Comparison of Fractional FLow Reserve And Intravascular ultrasound-guided Intervention Strategy for Clinical OUtcomes in Patients with InteRmediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR) trial is an international, multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial. A total of 1,700 consecutive patients with intermediate stenosis (40%-70% by visual estimation) in a major epicardial coronary artery will be randomized 1:1 to receive either FFR-guided or IVUS-guided PCI strategy. Patients will be treated with PCI according to the predefined criteria for revascularization; FFR ≤ 0.80 in the FFR-guided group and Minimal Lumen Area (MLA) ≤3 mm (or 3 mm<MLA ≤4 mm and plaque burden >70%) in the IVUS-guided group. The primary end point is the patient-oriented composite outcome, which is a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and any repeat revascularization at 24months after randomization. We will test noninferiority of current standard FFR-guided PCI strategy compared with IVUS-guided decision for PCI and stent optimization strategy.

CONCLUSION

The FLAVOUR trial will compare the safety and efficacy of FFR- and IVUS-guided PCI strategies in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis. This study will provide an insight on optimal evaluation and treatment strategy for patients with intermediate coronary stenosis.

摘要

背景

冠状动脉造影术在定义导致缺血的狭窄病变方面存在局限性,尤其是在存在中度冠状动脉狭窄的情况下。血流储备分数(FFR)是目前定义缺血存在的标准方法,血管内超声(IVUS)是最常用的侵入性成像工具,可提供病变的几何形状,并提供斑块易损性的信息。本研究的主要目的是比较 FFR 指导和 IVUS 指导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)策略在中度冠状动脉狭窄患者中的安全性和疗效。

试验设计

比较血流储备分数和血管内超声指导干预策略对中度狭窄患者临床结局的影响(FLAVOUR)试验是一项国际、多中心、前瞻性、随机临床试验。将 1700 例连续的主要心外膜冠状动脉中度狭窄(目测 40%-70%)患者随机分为 1:1 接受 FFR 指导或 IVUS 指导的 PCI 策略。根据血管重建的预设标准对患者进行 PCI 治疗;FFR 指导组中 FFR ≤0.80,IVUS 指导组中最小管腔面积(MLA)≤3mm(或 3mm<MLA ≤4mm 且斑块负荷 >70%)。主要终点是患者导向的复合终点,即随机分组后 24 个月内全因死亡、心肌梗死和任何再次血运重建的复合终点。我们将测试目前标准的 FFR 指导 PCI 策略与 IVUS 指导的 PCI 决策和支架优化策略相比的非劣效性。

结论

FLAVOUR 试验将比较 FFR 和 IVUS 指导的 PCI 策略在中度冠状动脉狭窄患者中的安全性和疗效。该研究将为中度冠状动脉狭窄患者的最佳评估和治疗策略提供见解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验