Esteves Sandro C, Khastgir Gautam, Shah Jatin, Murdia Kshitiz, Gupta Shweta Mittal, Rao Durga G, Dash Soumyaroop, Ingale Kundan, Patil Milind, Moideen Kunji, Thakor Priti, Dewda Pavitra
ANDROFERT, Andrology and Human Reproduction Clinic, Campinas, Brazil.
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018 Apr 26;9:201. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00201. eCollection 2018.
Progesterone elevation (PE) during the late follicular phase of controlled ovarian stimulation in fresh embryo transfer fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles has been claimed to be associated with decreased pregnancy rates. However, the evidence is not unequivocal, and clinicians still have questions about the clinical validity of measuring P levels during the follicular phase of stimulated cycles. We reviewed the existing literature aimed at answering four relevant clinical questions, namely (i) Is gonadotropin type associated with PE during the follicular phase of stimulated cycles? (ii) Is PE on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) associated with negative fresh embryo transfer IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles outcomes in all patient subgroups? (iii) Which P thresholds are best to identify patients at risk of implantation failure due to PE in a fresh embryo transfer? and (iv) Should a freeze all policy be adopted in all the cycles with PE on the day of hCG? The existing evidence indicates that late follicular phase progesterone rise in gonadotropin releasing analog cycles is mainly caused by the supraphysiological stimulation of granulosa cells with exogenous follicle-stimulating hormone. Yet, the type of gonadotropin used for stimulation seems to play no significant role on progesterone levels at the end of stimulation. Furthermore, PE is not a universal phenomenon with evidence indicating that its detrimental consequences on pregnancy outcomes do not affect all patient populations equally. Patients with high ovarian response to control ovarian stimulation are more prone to exhibit PE at the late follicular phase. However, in studies showing an overall detrimental effect of PE on pregnancy rates, the adverse effect of PE on endometrial receptivity seems to be offset, at least in part, by the availability of good quality embryo for transfer in women with a high ovarian response. Given the limitations of the currently available assays to measure progesterone at low ranges, caution should be applied to adopt specific cutoff values above which the effect of progesterone rise could be considered detrimental and to recommend "freeze-all" based solely on pre-defined cutoff points.
在新鲜胚胎移植体外受精(IVF)/卵胞浆内单精子注射周期中,控制性卵巢刺激卵泡晚期的孕酮升高(PE)被认为与妊娠率降低有关。然而,证据并不明确,临床医生对于在刺激周期的卵泡期测量孕酮水平的临床有效性仍存在疑问。我们回顾了现有文献,旨在回答四个相关的临床问题,即:(i)刺激周期卵泡期的促性腺激素类型与PE有关吗?(ii)人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)日的PE在所有患者亚组中都与新鲜胚胎移植IVF/卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)周期的不良结局相关吗?(iii)在新鲜胚胎移植中,哪些孕酮阈值最适合识别因PE而有植入失败风险的患者?以及(iv)在hCG日有PE的所有周期中都应采用全冻策略吗?现有证据表明,促性腺激素释放类似物周期中卵泡晚期孕酮升高主要是由外源性促卵泡激素对颗粒细胞的超生理刺激引起的。然而,用于刺激的促性腺激素类型似乎对刺激结束时的孕酮水平没有显著影响。此外,PE并非普遍现象,有证据表明其对妊娠结局的有害影响并非对所有患者群体都有同等影响。对控制性卵巢刺激卵巢反应高的患者在卵泡晚期更易出现PE。然而,在显示PE对妊娠率有总体有害影响的研究中,PE对子宫内膜容受性的不利影响似乎至少部分被卵巢反应高的女性可用于移植的优质胚胎所抵消。鉴于目前可用的低范围孕酮测量方法的局限性,应谨慎采用特定的临界值,高于该临界值孕酮升高的影响可被视为有害,并仅基于预先定义的临界值推荐“全冻”。