Nygård Lotte, Aznar Marianne C, Fischer Barbara M, Persson Gitte F, Christensen Charlotte B, Andersen Flemming L, Josipovic Mirjana, Langer Seppo W, Kjær Andreas, Vogelius Ivan R, Bentzen Søren M
Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Apr 25;8(2):127-136. eCollection 2018.
We measured the repeatability of FDG PET/CT uptake metrics when acquiring scans in free breathing (FB) conditions compared with deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) for locally advanced lung cancer. Twenty patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Two FDG PET/CT scans per patient were conducted few days apart and in two breathing conditions (FB and DIBH). This resulted in four scans per patient. Up to four FDG PET avid lesions per patient were contoured. The following FDG metrics were measured in all lesions and in all four scans: Standardized uptake value (SUV), SUV, SUV, metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), based on an isocontur of 50% of SUV. FDG PET avid volumes were delineated by a nuclear medicine physician. The gross tumor volumes (GTV) were contoured on the corresponding CT scans. Nineteen patients were available for analysis. Test-retest standard deviations of FDG uptake metrics in FB and DIBH were: SUV FB/DIBH: 16.2%/16.5%; SUV: 18.2%/22.1%; SUV: 18.3%/22.1%; TLG: 32.4%/40.5%. DIBH compared to FB resulted in higher values with mean differences in SUV of 12.6%, SUV 4.4% and SUV 11.9%. MTV, TLG and GTV were all significantly smaller on day 1 in DIBH compared to FB. However, the differences between metrics under FB and DIBH were in all cases smaller than 1 SD of the day to day repeatability. FDG acquisition in DIBH does not have a clinically relevant impact on the uptake metrics and does not improve the test-retest repeatability of FDG uptake metrics in lung cancer patients.
我们测量了局部晚期肺癌患者在自由呼吸(FB)条件下与深吸气屏气(DIBH)条件下进行扫描时,FDG PET/CT摄取指标的可重复性。20名患者纳入了这项前瞻性研究。每位患者在两种呼吸条件(FB和DIBH)下,间隔数天进行两次FDG PET/CT扫描。这导致每位患者有四次扫描。每位患者最多勾勒出四个FDG PET摄取病灶。在所有病灶以及所有四次扫描中测量以下FDG指标:基于SUV 50%等轮廓线的标准化摄取值(SUV)、SUV、SUV、代谢肿瘤体积(MTV)和总病灶糖酵解(TLG)。FDG PET摄取体积由核医学医师勾勒。在相应的CT扫描上勾勒出大体肿瘤体积(GTV)。19名患者可供分析。FB和DIBH条件下FDG摄取指标的重测标准差为:SUV FB/DIBH:16.2%/16.5%;SUV:18.2%/22.1%;SUV:18.3%/22.1%;TLG:32.4%/40.5%。与FB相比,DIBH导致的值更高,SUV的平均差异为12.6%,SUV为4.4%,SUV为11.9%。与FB相比,DIBH第1天的MTV、TLG和GTV均显著更小。然而,FB和DIBH条件下指标之间的差异在所有情况下均小于每日可重复性的1个标准差。在肺癌患者中,DIBH条件下的FDG采集对摄取指标没有临床相关影响,也没有提高FDG摄取指标的重测可重复性。