1 Escuela de Kinesiologia, Facultad de Ciencias de la Rehabilitacion, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile.
2 Carrera de Fonoaudiologia, Departamento Ciencias de la Salud, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Clin Rehabil. 2018 Oct;32(10):1317-1327. doi: 10.1177/0269215518774832. Epub 2018 May 13.
To compare the effects of an inspiratory versus and expiratory muscle-training program on voluntary and reflex peak cough flow in patients with Parkinson disease.
A randomized controlled study.
Home-based training program.
In all, 40 participants with diagnosis of Parkinson's disease were initially recruited in the study and randomly allocated to three study groups. Of them, 31 participants completed the study protocol (control group, n = 10; inspiratory training group, n = 11; and expiratory training group, n = 10) Intervention: The inspiratory and expiratory group performed a home-based inspiratory and expiratory muscle-training program, respectively (five sets of five repetitions). Both groups trained six times a week for two months using a progressively increased resistance. The control group performed expiratory muscle training using the same protocol and a fixed resistance.
Spirometric indices, maximum inspiratory pressure, maximum expiratory pressure, and peak cough flow during voluntary and reflex cough were assessed before and at two months after training.
The magnitude of increase in maximum expiratory pressure ( d = 1.40) and voluntary peak cough flow ( d = 0.89) was greater for the expiratory muscle-training group in comparison to the control group. Reflex peak cough flow had a moderate effect ( d = 0.27) in the expiratory group in comparison to the control group. Slow vital capacity ( d = 0.13) and forced vital capacity ( d = 0.02) had trivial effects in the expiratory versus the control group.
Two months of expiratory muscle-training program was more beneficial than inspiratory muscle-training program for improving maximum expiratory pressure and voluntary peak cough flow in patients with Parkinson's disease.
比较吸气肌训练与呼气肌训练对帕金森病患者自主咳嗽和反射性咳嗽峰流速的影响。
随机对照研究。
家庭训练方案。
最初招募了 40 名诊断为帕金森病的患者参与研究,并随机分为三组。其中 31 名患者完成了研究方案(对照组 10 名,吸气肌训练组 11 名,呼气肌训练组 10 名)。
吸气肌训练组和呼气肌训练组分别进行家庭吸气肌和呼气肌训练方案(五组,每组五次)。两组均每周训练六次,使用逐渐增加的阻力。对照组采用相同方案和固定阻力进行呼气肌训练。
训练前和训练后两个月时,评估肺活量计指标、最大吸气压力、最大呼气压力以及自主咳嗽和反射性咳嗽时的峰流速。
与对照组相比,呼气肌训练组的最大呼气压力( d = 1.40)和自主咳嗽峰流速( d = 0.89)增加幅度更大。与对照组相比,呼气组的反射性咳嗽峰流速具有中度影响( d = 0.27)。与对照组相比,呼气组的用力肺活量( d = 0.02)和第一秒用力呼气量( d = 0.13)具有较小的影响。
与吸气肌训练方案相比,两个月的呼气肌训练方案更有利于改善帕金森病患者的最大呼气压力和自主咳嗽峰流速。