Suppr超能文献

左心室辅助装置植入术后作为终点治疗的室性心动过速的特征:单中心消融经验。

Characterization of Ventricular Tachycardia After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation as Destination Therapy: A Single-Center Ablation Experience.

机构信息

Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Heart and Vascular Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Dec 11;3(12):1412-1424. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 Aug 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to report mechanisms of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and outcomes of VT ablation in patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as destination therapy.

BACKGROUND

Continuous flow LVAD implantation plays a growing role in the management of end-stage heart failure, and VT is common. There are limited reports of VT ablation in patients with a destination LVAD.

METHODS

Patients with a continuous-flow LVAD referred for VT ablation from 2010 to 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. Baseline patient characteristics, procedural data, and clinical follow-up were evaluated. Arrhythmia-free survival was assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (90% male, 62 ± 10 years) underwent catheter ablation of VT at a median of 191 days (interquartile range: 55 to 403 days) after LVAD implantation (15 HeartMate II, 6 HeartWare HVAD). Five patients (24%) had termination (n = 4) or slowing (n = 1) of VT with ablation near the apical inflow cannula, and 3 (14%) had bundle-branch re-entry. Freedom from recurrent VT among surviving patients was 64% at 1 year, with overall survival 67% at 1 year for patients without arrhythmia recurrence and 29% for patients with recurrence (p = 0.049). One patient had suspected pump thrombosis within 30 days of the ablation procedure, with no other major acute complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In this relatively large, single-center experience of VT ablation in destination LVAD, freedom from recurrent VT and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks was associated with improved 1-year survival. Bundle branch re-entry was more prevalent than anticipated, and cannula-adjacent VT was less common. This challenging population remains at risk for late pump thrombosis and mortality.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在报告作为终末期心力衰竭治疗手段的左心室辅助装置(LVAD)患者室性心动过速(VT)的发生机制和 VT 消融的结果。

背景

连续血流 LVAD 的植入在终末期心力衰竭的治疗中发挥着越来越重要的作用,VT 也很常见。关于 LVAD 作为终末期心力衰竭治疗手段的患者 VT 消融的报告有限。

方法

回顾性分析了 2010 年至 2016 年期间因 VT 消融而转诊至我院的连续血流 LVAD 患者。评估了患者的基线特征、手术数据和临床随访情况。评估了心律失常无复发生存率。

结果

21 例患者(90%为男性,62±10 岁)在 LVAD 植入后中位时间 191 天(四分位距:55 至 403 天)接受了 VT 的导管消融(15 例 HeartMate II,6 例 HeartWare HVAD)。5 例患者(24%)在消融靠近心尖流入管时 VT 终止(n=4)或减慢(n=1),3 例(14%)发生束支折返。存活患者中,无复发性 VT 的 1 年生存率为 64%,无心律失常复发患者的总生存率为 67%,而有复发患者的总生存率为 29%(p=0.049)。1 例患者在消融术后 30 天内疑似发生泵血栓,无其他严重急性并发症。

结论

在这项针对 LVAD 作为终末期心力衰竭治疗手段的患者的 VT 消融的较大的单中心经验中,无复发性 VT 和植入式心律转复除颤器电击的生存率与 1 年生存率相关。束支折返比预期更常见,而毗邻心尖流入管的 VT 较少见。这一具有挑战性的人群仍存在晚期泵血栓和死亡率的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验