高度活跃的体力劳动者是否会早逝?一项基于 193696 名参与者数据的系统回顾和荟萃分析

Do highly physically active workers die early? A systematic review with meta-analysis of data from 193 696 participants.

机构信息

Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Centre (VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Sports Med. 2018 Oct;52(20):1320-1326. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098540. Epub 2018 May 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Recent evidence suggests the existence of a physical activity paradox, with beneficial health outcomes associated with leisure time physical activity, but detrimental health outcomes for those engaging in high level occupational physical activity. This is the first quantitative systematic review of evidence regarding the association between occupational physical activity and all-cause mortality.

DESIGN

Systematic review with meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCE

A literature search was performed in electronic databases PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

We screened for peer reviewed articles from prospective studies assessing the association of occupational physical activity with all-cause mortality. A meta-analysis assessed the association of high (compared with low) level occupational physical activity with all-cause mortality, estimating pooled hazard ratios (HR) (with 95% CI).

RESULTS

2490 unique articles were screened and 33 (from 26 studies) were included. Data from 17 studies (with 193 696 participants) were used in a meta-analysis, showing that men with high level occupational physical activity had an 18% increased risk of early mortality compared with those engaging in low level occupational physical activity (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.34). No such association was observed among women, for whom instead a tendency for an inverse association was found (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this review indicate detrimental health consequences associated with high level occupational physical activity in men, even when adjusting for relevant factors (such as leisure time physical activity). These findings suggest that research and physical activity guidelines may differentiate between occupational and leisure time physical activity.

摘要

目的

最近的证据表明存在体力活动悖论,即与休闲时间体力活动相关的有益健康结果,但与从事高水平职业体力活动的人相关的健康结果则相反。这是首次对职业体力活动与全因死亡率之间关联的证据进行定量系统评价。

设计

系统评价与荟萃分析。

资料来源

在电子数据库 PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO 和 Cochrane 中进行了文献检索。

纳入研究的标准

我们筛选了评估职业体力活动与全因死亡率关联的前瞻性研究的同行评审文章。荟萃分析评估了高水平(与低水平相比)职业体力活动与全因死亡率的关联,估计了合并的危险比(HR)(95%CI)。

结果

筛选了 2490 篇独特的文章,纳入了 33 篇(来自 26 项研究)。来自 17 项研究(193696 名参与者)的数据用于荟萃分析,结果表明,与从事低水平职业体力活动的人相比,从事高水平职业体力活动的男性早期死亡风险增加了 18%(HR 1.18,95%CI 1.05 至 1.34)。在女性中没有观察到这种关联,相反,发现了一种反向关联的趋势(HR 0.90,95%CI 0.80 至 1.01)。

结论

本综述的结果表明,高水平职业体力活动与男性健康后果有害,即使在调整了相关因素(如休闲时间体力活动)后也是如此。这些发现表明,研究和体力活动指南可能需要区分职业和休闲时间体力活动。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索