Everitt Hazel, Baldwin David S, Stuart Beth, Lipinska Gosia, Mayers Andrew, Malizia Andrea L, Manson Christopher Cf, Wilson Sue
Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton, UK, SO16 5ST.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 14;5(5):CD010753. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010753.pub2.
Insomnia disorder is a subjective condition of unsatisfactory sleep (e.g. sleep onset, maintenance, early waking, impairment of daytime functioning). Insomnia disorder impairs quality of life and is associated with an increased risk of physical and mental health problems including anxiety, depression, drug and alcohol abuse, and increased health service use. hypnotic medications (e.g. benzodiazepines and 'Z' drugs) are licensed for sleep promotion, but can induce tolerance and dependence, although many people remain on long-term treatment. Antidepressant use for insomnia is widespread, but none is licensed for insomnia and the evidence for their efficacy is unclear. This use of unlicensed medications may be driven by concern over longer-term use of hypnotics and the limited availability of psychological treatments.
To assess the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of antidepressants for insomnia in adults.
This review incorporated the results of searches to July 2015 conducted on electronic bibliographic databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, 2015, Issue 6), MEDLINE (1950 to 2015), Embase (1980 to 2015) and PsycINFO (1806 to 2015). We updated the searches to December 2017, but these results have not yet been incorporated into the review.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adults (aged 18 years or older) with a primary diagnosis of insomnia and all participant types including people with comorbidities. Any antidepressant as monotherapy at any dose whether compared with placebo, other medications for insomnia (e.g. benzodiazepines and 'Z' drugs), a different antidepressant, waiting list control or treatment as usual.
Two review authors independently assessed trials for eligibility and extracted data using a data extraction form. A third review author resolved disagreements on inclusion or data extraction.
The search identified 23 RCTs (2806 participants).Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) compared with placebo: three studies (135 participants) compared SSRIs with placebo. Combining results was not possible. Two paroxetine studies showed significant improvements in subjective sleep measures at six (60 participants, P = 0.03) and 12 weeks (27 participants, P < 0.001). There was no difference in the fluoxetine study (low quality evidence).There were either no adverse events or they were not reported (very low quality evidence).Tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) compared with placebo: six studies (812 participants) compared TCA with placebo; five used doxepin and one used trimipramine. We found no studies of amitriptyline. Four studies (518 participants) could be pooled, showing a moderate improvement in subjective sleep quality over placebo (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.56 to -0.21) (moderate quality evidence). Moderate quality evidence suggested that TCAs possibly improved sleep efficiency (mean difference (MD) 6.29 percentage points, 95% CI 3.17 to 9.41; 4 studies; 510 participants) and increased sleep time (MD 22.88 minutes, 95% CI 13.17 to 32.59; 4 studies; 510 participants). There may have been little or no impact on sleep latency (MD -4.27 minutes, 95% CI -9.01 to 0.48; 4 studies; 510 participants).There may have been little or no difference in adverse events between TCAs and placebo (risk ratio (RR) 1.02, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.21; 6 studies; 812 participants) (low quality evidence).'Other' antidepressants with placebo: eight studies compared other antidepressants with placebo (one used mianserin and seven used trazodone). Three studies (370 participants) of trazodone could be pooled, indicating a moderate improvement in subjective sleep outcomes over placebo (SMD -0.34, 95% CI -0.66 to -0.02). Two studies of trazodone measured polysomnography and found little or no difference in sleep efficiency (MD 1.38 percentage points, 95% CI -2.87 to 5.63; 169 participants) (low quality evidence).There was low quality evidence from two studies of more adverse effects with trazodone than placebo (i.e. morning grogginess, increased dry mouth and thirst).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We identified relatively few, mostly small studies with short-term follow-up and design limitations. The effects of SSRIs compared with placebo are uncertain with too few studies to draw clear conclusions. There may be a small improvement in sleep quality with short-term use of low-dose doxepin and trazodone compared with placebo. The tolerability and safety of antidepressants for insomnia is uncertain due to limited reporting of adverse events. There was no evidence for amitriptyline (despite common use in clinical practice) or for long-term antidepressant use for insomnia. High-quality trials of antidepressants for insomnia are needed.
失眠症是一种睡眠质量不佳的主观状况(例如入睡困难、睡眠维持障碍、早醒、日间功能受损)。失眠症会损害生活质量,并与身心健康问题风险增加相关,包括焦虑、抑郁、药物和酒精滥用以及医疗服务使用增加。催眠药物(如苯二氮䓬类药物和“Z”类药物)被批准用于促进睡眠,但会导致耐受性和依赖性,尽管许多人仍在接受长期治疗。使用抗抑郁药治疗失眠的情况很普遍,但尚无药物被批准用于失眠治疗,其疗效证据也不明确。这种使用未获批准药物的情况可能是由于对长期使用催眠药物的担忧以及心理治疗的可及性有限所致。
评估抗抑郁药治疗成人失眠的有效性、安全性和耐受性。
本综述纳入了截至2015年7月在电子书目数据库中进行检索的结果:Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL,2015年第6期)、MEDLINE(1950年至2015年)、Embase(1980年至2015年)和PsycINFO(1806年至2015年)。我们将检索更新至2017年12月,但这些结果尚未纳入本综述。
针对原发性失眠的成年人(18岁及以上)进行的随机对照试验(RCT),所有参与者类型包括患有合并症的人。任何抗抑郁药作为单一疗法,无论剂量如何,与安慰剂、其他失眠治疗药物(如苯二氮䓬类药物和“Z”类药物)、不同的抗抑郁药、等待名单对照或常规治疗进行比较。
两位综述作者独立评估试验的合格性,并使用数据提取表提取数据。第三位综述作者解决了关于纳入或数据提取的分歧。
检索到23项RCT(2806名参与者)。
选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)与安慰剂比较:三项研究(135名参与者)将SSRI与安慰剂进行了比较。无法合并结果。两项帕罗西汀研究显示,在6周(60名参与者,P = 0.03)和12周(27名参与者,P < 0.001)时,主观睡眠指标有显著改善。氟西汀研究中无差异(低质量证据)。未发生不良事件或未报告不良事件(极低质量证据)。
三环类抗抑郁药(TCA)与安慰剂比较:六项研究(812名参与者)将TCA与安慰剂进行了比较;五项使用多塞平,一项使用曲米帕明。未找到阿米替林的研究。四项研究(518名参与者)可以合并,显示与安慰剂相比,主观睡眠质量有中度改善(标准化均数差(SMD)-0.39,95%置信区间(CI)-0.56至-0.21)(中等质量证据)。中等质量证据表明,TCA可能改善了睡眠效率(均数差(MD)6.29个百分点,95%CI 3.17至9.41;4项研究;510名参与者)并增加了睡眠时间(MD 22.88分钟,95%CI 13.17至32.59;4项研究;510名参与者)。对睡眠潜伏期可能几乎没有影响(MD -4.27分钟,95%CI -9.01至0.48;4项研究;510名参与者)。TCA与安慰剂之间的不良事件可能几乎没有差异(风险比(RR)1.02,95%CI 0.86至1.21;6项研究;812名参与者)(低质量证据)。
“其他”抗抑郁药与安慰剂比较:八项研究将其他抗抑郁药与安慰剂进行了比较(一项使用米安色林,七项使用曲唑酮)。三项曲唑酮研究(370名参与者)可以合并,表明与安慰剂相比,主观睡眠结果有中度改善(SMD -0.34,95%CI -0.66至-0.02)。两项曲唑酮研究测量了多导睡眠图,发现睡眠效率几乎没有差异(MD 1.38个百分点,95%CI -2.87至5.63;169名参与者)(低质量证据)。两项研究提供的低质量证据表明,曲唑酮的不良反应比安慰剂更多(即早晨困倦、口干和口渴增加)。
我们发现相关研究较少,大多为短期随访且存在设计局限性的小型研究。与安慰剂相比,SSRI的效果尚不确定,研究数量过少无法得出明确结论。与安慰剂相比,短期使用低剂量多塞平和曲唑酮可能会使睡眠质量有小幅改善。由于不良事件报告有限,抗抑郁药治疗失眠的耐受性和安全性尚不确定。没有证据支持阿米替林(尽管在临床实践中常用)或长期使用抗抑郁药治疗失眠。需要开展高质量的抗抑郁药治疗失眠试验。