Agabio Roberta, Trogu Emanuela, Pani Pier Paolo
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Neuroscience and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 24;4(4):CD008581. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008581.pub2.
Alcohol dependence is a major public health problem characterized by recidivism, and medical and psychosocial complications. The co-occurrence of major depression in people entering treatment for alcohol dependence is common, and represents a risk factor for morbidity and mortality, which negatively influences treatment outcomes.
To assess the benefits and risks of antidepressants for the treatment of people with co-occurring depression and alcohol dependence.
We searched the Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group Specialised Register (via CRSLive), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and Embase from inception to July 2017. We also searched for ongoing and unpublished studies via ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (apps.who.int/trialsearch/).All searches included non-English language literature. We handsearched references of topic-related systematic reviews and the included studies.
Randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials comparing antidepressants alone or in association with other drugs or psychosocial interventions (or both) versus placebo, no treatment, and other pharmacological or psychosocial interventions.
We used standard methodological procedures as expected by Cochrane.
We included 33 studies in the review (2242 participants). Antidepressants were compared to placebo (22 studies), psychotherapy (two studies), other medications (four studies), or other antidepressants (five studies). The mean duration of the trials was 9.9 weeks (range 3 to 26 weeks). Eighteen studies took place in the USA, 12 in Europe, two in Turkey, and one in Australia. The antidepressant included in most of the trials was sertraline; other medications were amitriptyline, citalopram, desipramine, doxepin, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, imipramine, mianserin, mirtazepine, nefazodone, paroxetine, tianeptine, venlafaxine, and viloxazine. Eighteen studies were conducted in an outpatient setting, nine in an inpatient setting, and six in both settings. Psychosocial treatment was provided in 18 studies. There was high heterogeneity in the selection of outcomes and the rating systems used for diagnosis and outcome assessment.Comparing antidepressants to placebo, low-quality evidence suggested that antidepressants reduced the severity of depression evaluated with interviewer-rated scales at the end of trial (14 studies, 1074 participants, standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.49 to -0.04). However, the difference became non-significant after the exclusion of studies with a high risk of bias (SMD -0.17, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.04). In addition, very low-quality evidence supported the efficacy of antidepressants in increasing the response to the treatment (10 studies, 805 participants, risk ratio (RR) 1.40, 95% Cl 1.08 to 1.82). This result became non-significant after the exclusion of studies at high risk of bias (RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.68). There was no difference for other relevant outcomes such as the difference between baseline and final score, evaluated using interviewer-rated scales (5 studies, 447 participants, SMD 0.15, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.42).Moderate-quality evidence found that antidepressants increased the number of participants abstinent from alcohol during the trial (7 studies, 424 participants, RR 1.71, 95% Cl 1.22 to 2.39) and reduced the number of drinks per drinking days (7 studies, 451 participants, mean difference (MD) -1.13 drinks per drinking days, 95% Cl -1.79 to -0.46). After the exclusion of studies with high risk of bias, the number of abstinent remained higher (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.43) and the number of drinks per drinking days lower (MD -1.21 number of drinks per drinking days, 95% CI -1.91 to -0.51) among participants who received antidepressants compared to those who received placebo. However, other outcomes such as the rate of abstinent days did not differ between antidepressants and placebo (9 studies, 821 participants, MD 1.34, 95% Cl -1.66 to 4.34; low-quality evidence).Low-quality evidence suggested no differences between antidepressants and placebo in the number of dropouts (17 studies, 1159 participants, RR 0.98, 95% Cl 0.79 to 1.22) and adverse events as withdrawal for medical reasons (10 studies, 947 participants, RR 1.15, 95% Cl 0.65 to 2.04).There were few studies comparing one antidepressant versus another antidepressant or antidepressants versus other interventions, and these had a small sample size and were heterogeneous in terms of the types of interventions that were compared, yielding results that were not informative.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found low-quality evidence supporting the clinical use of antidepressants in the treatment of people with co-occurring depression and alcohol dependence. Antidepressants had positive effects on certain relevant outcomes related to depression and alcohol use but not on other relevant outcomes. Moreover, most of these positive effects were no longer significant when studies with high risk of bias were excluded. Results were limited by the large number of studies showing high or unclear risk of bias and the low number of studies comparing one antidepressant to another or antidepressants to other medication. In people with co-occurring depression and alcohol dependence, the risk of developing adverse effects appeared to be minimal, especially for the newer classes of antidepressants (such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors). According to these results, in people with co-occurring depression and alcohol dependence, antidepressants may be useful for the treatment of depression, alcohol dependence, or both, although the clinical relevance may be modest.
酒精依赖是一个主要的公共卫生问题,其特征为复发以及医学和心理社会并发症。在因酒精依赖而接受治疗的人群中,重度抑郁症的共病情况很常见,并且是发病和死亡的一个风险因素,会对治疗结果产生负面影响。
评估抗抑郁药治疗同时患有抑郁症和酒精依赖的患者的益处和风险。
我们检索了Cochrane药物与酒精问题专业注册库(通过CRSLive)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE和Embase,检索时间从建库至2017年7月。我们还通过ClinicalTrials.gov(www.clinicaltrials.gov)和世界卫生组织(WHO)国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)(apps.who.int/trialsearch/)检索了正在进行和未发表的研究。所有检索均包括非英语文献。我们手工检索了主题相关系统评价和纳入研究的参考文献。
随机对照试验和对照临床试验,比较单独使用抗抑郁药或与其他药物或心理社会干预措施(或两者)联合使用与安慰剂、不治疗以及其他药物或心理社会干预措施。
我们采用了Cochrane预期的标准方法程序。
我们在本评价中纳入了33项研究(2242名参与者)。将抗抑郁药与安慰剂(22项研究)、心理治疗(2项研究)、其他药物(4项研究)或其他抗抑郁药(5项研究)进行了比较。试验的平均持续时间为9.9周(范围3至26周)。18项研究在美国进行,12项在欧洲进行,2项在土耳其进行,1项在澳大利亚进行。大多数试验中使用的抗抑郁药是舍曲林;其他药物有阿米替林、西酞普兰、地昔帕明、多塞平、艾司西酞普兰、氟西汀、氟伏沙明、丙咪嗪、米安色林、米氮平、奈法唑酮、帕罗西汀、噻奈普汀、文拉法辛和维洛沙嗪。18项研究在门诊环境中进行,9项在住院环境中进行,6项在两种环境中均进行。18项研究提供了心理社会治疗。在结局选择以及用于诊断和结局评估的评分系统方面存在高度异质性。将抗抑郁药与安慰剂进行比较,低质量证据表明抗抑郁药在试验结束时降低了用访谈者评定量表评估的抑郁严重程度(14项研究,1074名参与者,标准化均数差(SMD)-0.27,95%置信区间(CI)-0.49至-0.04)。然而,在排除偏倚风险高的研究后,差异变得不显著(SMD -0.17,95% CI -0.39至0.04)。此外,极低质量证据支持抗抑郁药在提高治疗反应方面的疗效(10项研究,805名参与者,风险比(RR)1.40,95% Cl 1.08至1.82)。在排除偏倚风险高的研究后,这一结果变得不显著(RR 1.27,95% CI 0.96至1.68)。对于其他相关结局,如使用访谈者评定量表评估的基线与最终评分之间的差异,没有差异(5项研究,447名参与者,SMD 0.15,95% CI -0.12至0.42)。中等质量证据发现抗抑郁药增加了试验期间戒酒的参与者人数(7项研究,424名参与者,RR 1.71,95% Cl 1.22至2.39),并减少了每个饮酒日的饮酒量(7项研究,451名参与者,平均差(MD)-1.13个饮酒日/天,95% Cl -1.79至-0.46)。在排除偏倚风险高的研究后,与接受安慰剂的参与者相比,接受抗抑郁药的参与者中戒酒人数仍然更高(RR 1.69,95% CI 1.18至2.43),每个饮酒日的饮酒量更低(MD -1.21个饮酒日/天,95% CI -1.91至-0.51)。然而,抗抑郁药与安慰剂之间在戒酒天数比例等其他结局方面没有差异(9项研究,821名参与者,MD 1.34,95% Cl -1.66至4.34;低质量证据)。低质量证据表明抗抑郁药与安慰剂在退出人数(17项研究,1159名参与者,RR 0.98,95% Cl 0.79至1.22)和因医疗原因停药等不良事件方面没有差异(10项研究,947名参与者,RR 1.15,95% Cl 0.65至2.04)。比较一种抗抑郁药与另一种抗抑郁药或抗抑郁药与其他干预措施的研究很少,且这些研究样本量小,在比较的干预措施类型方面存在异质性,结果缺乏信息性。
我们发现低质量证据支持抗抑郁药在治疗同时患有抑郁症和酒精依赖的患者中的临床应用。抗抑郁药对与抑郁和酒精使用相关的某些相关结局有积极影响,但对其他相关结局没有影响。此外,当排除偏倚风险高的研究时,这些积极影响大多不再显著。结果受到大量显示高偏倚风险或不明确偏倚风险的研究以及比较一种抗抑郁药与另一种抗抑郁药或抗抑郁药与其他药物的研究数量少的限制。在同时患有抑郁症和酒精依赖的患者中,出现不良反应的风险似乎最小,尤其是对于较新的抗抑郁药类别(如选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂)。根据这些结果,在同时患有抑郁症和酒精依赖的患者中,抗抑郁药可能对治疗抑郁症、酒精依赖或两者都有用,尽管临床相关性可能不大。