• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

压力适应红树林基因组中吉普赛 LTR 反转录转座子与 CHH 甲基化之间的持续冲突。

Constant conflict between Gypsy LTR retrotransposons and CHH methylation within a stress-adapted mangrove genome.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Plant Resources, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

New Phytol. 2018 Nov;220(3):922-935. doi: 10.1111/nph.15209. Epub 2018 May 15.

DOI:10.1111/nph.15209
PMID:29762876
Abstract

The evolutionary dynamics of the conflict between transposable elements (TEs) and their host genome remain elusive. This conflict will be intense in stress-adapted plants as stress can often reactivate TEs. Mangroves reduce TE load convergently in their adaptation to intertidal environments and thus provide a unique opportunity to address the host-TE conflict and its interaction with stress adaptation. Using the mangrove Rhizophora apiculata as a model, we investigated methylation and short interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting patterns in relation to the abundance and age of long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons. We also examined the distance of LTR retrotransposons to genes, the impact on neighboring gene expression and population frequencies. We found differential accumulation amongst classes of LTR retrotransposons despite high overall methylation levels. This can be attributed to 24-nucleotide siRNA-mediated CHH methylation preferentially targeting Gypsy elements, particularly in their LTR regions. Old Gypsy elements possess unusually abundant siRNAs which show cross-mapping to young copies. Gypsy elements appear to be closer to genes and under stronger purifying selection than other classes. Our results suggest a continuous host-TE battle masked by the TE load reduction in R. apiculata. This conflict may enable mangroves, such as R. apiculata, to maintain genetic diversity and thus evolutionary potential during stress adaptation.

摘要

转座元件 (TEs) 与其宿主基因组之间的冲突的进化动态仍然难以捉摸。在适应压力的植物中,这种冲突将非常激烈,因为压力通常会重新激活 TEs。红树林在适应潮间带环境时会趋同地降低 TE 负荷,因此为解决宿主-TE 冲突及其与压力适应的相互作用提供了独特的机会。我们使用红树林 Rhizophora apiculata 作为模型,研究了与长末端重复 (LTR) 反转录转座子丰度和年龄相关的甲基化和短干扰 RNA (siRNA) 靶向模式。我们还研究了 LTR 反转录转座子与基因的距离、对邻近基因表达和种群频率的影响。尽管总体甲基化水平较高,但我们发现 LTR 反转录转座子的类群之间存在差异积累。这归因于 24 个核苷酸的 siRNA 介导的 CHH 甲基化优先靶向 Gypsy 元件,特别是在它们的 LTR 区域。旧的 Gypsy 元件具有异常丰富的 siRNAs,这些 siRNAs 显示与年轻副本的交叉映射。Gypsy 元件似乎比其他类群更接近基因,并受到更强的纯化选择。我们的研究结果表明,在 R. apiculata 中,TE 负荷降低掩盖了持续的宿主-TE 斗争。这种冲突可能使红树林(如 R. apiculata)在适应压力时保持遗传多样性和进化潜力。

相似文献

1
Constant conflict between Gypsy LTR retrotransposons and CHH methylation within a stress-adapted mangrove genome.压力适应红树林基因组中吉普赛 LTR 反转录转座子与 CHH 甲基化之间的持续冲突。
New Phytol. 2018 Nov;220(3):922-935. doi: 10.1111/nph.15209. Epub 2018 May 15.
2
Convergent adaptive evolution in marginal environments: unloading transposable elements as a common strategy among mangrove genomes.边缘环境中的趋同适应性进化:转座元件的卸载作为红树基因组中的共同策略。
New Phytol. 2018 Jan;217(1):428-438. doi: 10.1111/nph.14784. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
3
Weak Effect of Retrotransposon Bursts on Salt Stress Gene Expression.逆转座子爆发对盐胁迫基因表达的微弱影响。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jan 17;12:830079. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.830079. eCollection 2021.
4
Recent retrotransposon insertions are methylated and phylogenetically clustered in japonica rice (Oryza sativa spp. japonica).近期反转录转座子插入在粳稻(Oryza sativa spp. japonica)中发生甲基化并呈现系统发育聚类。
Mol Biol Evol. 2012 Oct;29(10):3193-203. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss129. Epub 2012 May 15.
5
LTR-retrotransposons in plants: Engines of evolution.植物中的长末端重复序列逆转座子:进化的引擎
Gene. 2017 Aug 30;626:14-25. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2017.04.051. Epub 2017 May 2.
6
Mollusc genomes reveal variability in patterns of LTR-retrotransposons dynamics.软体动物基因组揭示了 LTR 反转录转座子动态模式的可变性。
BMC Genomics. 2018 Nov 15;19(1):821. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5200-1.
7
Long terminal repeat retrotransposons of Oryza sativa.水稻的长末端重复逆转座子
Genome Biol. 2002 Sep 13;3(10):RESEARCH0053. doi: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-10-research0053.
8
Genomic abundance and transcriptional activity of diverse gypsy and copia long terminal repeat retrotransposons in three wild sunflower species.三种野生向日葵中不同的 gypsy 和 copia 长末端重复反转录转座子的基因组丰度和转录活性。
BMC Plant Biol. 2018 Jan 5;18(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12870-017-1223-z.
9
Evolutionary history of Oryza sativa LTR retrotransposons: a preliminary survey of the rice genome sequences.水稻LTR反转录转座子的进化史:对水稻基因组序列的初步调查
BMC Genomics. 2004 Mar 2;5(1):18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-5-18.
10
Evolutionary Epigenomics of Retrotransposon-Mediated Methylation Spreading in Rice.逆转座子介导的甲基化扩散在水稻中的进化表观基因组学。
Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Feb 1;35(2):365-382. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx284.

引用本文的文献

1
Epigenetic Mechanisms Driving Adaptation in Tropical and Subtropical Plants: Insights and Future Directions.驱动热带和亚热带植物适应性的表观遗传机制:见解与未来方向
Plant Cell Environ. 2025 May;48(5):3487-3499. doi: 10.1111/pce.15370. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
2
Profiling genome-wide methylation in two maples: Fine-scale approaches to detection with nanopore technology.两种枫树全基因组甲基化分析:利用纳米孔技术的精细检测方法
Evol Appl. 2024 Apr 17;17(4):e13669. doi: 10.1111/eva.13669. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Two-speed genome evolution drives pathogenicity in fungal pathogens of animals.
双速基因组进化驱动动物病原真菌的致病性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jan 10;120(2):e2212633120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2212633120. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
4
Jack of all trades: Genome assembly of Wild Jack and comparative genomics of .万事通:野生杰克的基因组组装及……的比较基因组学 (原文结尾不完整,翻译可能不太准确)
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Dec 12;13:1029540. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1029540. eCollection 2022.
5
Retrotransposons: How the continuous evolutionary front shapes plant genomes for response to heat stress.逆转座子:持续的进化前沿如何塑造植物基因组以应对热胁迫。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Dec 9;13:1064847. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1064847. eCollection 2022.
6
Epigenetic targeting of transposon relics: beating the dead horses of the genome?表观遗传学靶向转座子遗迹:重蹈基因组的覆辙?
Epigenetics. 2022 Nov;17(11):1331-1344. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2021.2022066. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
7
Phenotypic and Methylome Responses to Salt Stress in Natural Accessions.自然群体中对盐胁迫的表型和甲基化组反应
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Mar 4;13:841154. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.841154. eCollection 2022.
8
Mangrove Forests: Natural Laboratories for Studying Epigenetic and Climate Changes.红树林:研究表观遗传学与气候变化的天然实验室
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Feb 22;13:851518. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.851518. eCollection 2022.
9
Weak Effect of Retrotransposon Bursts on Salt Stress Gene Expression.逆转座子爆发对盐胁迫基因表达的微弱影响。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jan 17;12:830079. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.830079. eCollection 2021.
10
Genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying mangrove adaptations to intertidal environments.红树植物适应潮间带环境的遗传和分子机制。
iScience. 2021 Nov 30;25(1):103547. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103547. eCollection 2022 Jan 21.