• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管成形术

Angioplasty

作者信息

Chhabra Lovely, Siddiqui Waqas J.

机构信息

New York Medical College

Drexel University

PMID:29763069
Abstract

Angioplasty with or without stenting is a nonsurgical procedure used to open clogged or narrow coronary arteries due to underlying atherosclerosis. The procedure involves introducing an inflatable balloon-tipped catheter through the skin in extremities and inflating the balloon once it traverses the stenosed arterial site. It presses the intraluminal plaque of atherosclerosis against the arterial wall and widens the luminal diameter. Thereby it normalizes the blood flow to the myocardium and achieves the goal of angioplasty or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by alleviating the chest pain. The PCI concept was introduced 40 years ago with the introduction of "plain old balloon angioplasty" (POBA) without stenting. In the mid-1980s, POBA use was limited because of an early complication of vascular recoil property and restenosis after balloon deflation which led to the invention of bare metal stents (BMS). During the procedure, professionals use a tube-like metallic meshwork, and its scaffolding properties counteract vascular recoil property, thereby avoiding the early restenosis of POBA due to vascular recoil. However, long-term, in situ BMS, can induce wall stress, endothelial discontinuity, and permanent presence of the metallic foreign body in arteries leading to inflammation with fibrin deposition and promoting myofibroblast migration which gives rise to in-stent restenosis (IRS) due to a mechanism of neointimal hyperplasia. This issue led to the development of drug-eluting stents (DES). DES technology uses a coating of an antiproliferative drug on top of the metallic structure of stents with the benefit of causing less neointimal hyperplasia and stent restenosis as compared with BMS. Late stent thrombosis is also associated with DES due to impaired arterial healing with a lack if re-endothelialization and fibrin deposition due to underlying chronic inflammation more commonly in first-generation DES. Second-generation DES has an extra coating of biocompatible polymer with better endothelial healing. Cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (second-generation DES) is safer than paclitaxel-eluting stent (first-generation DES) and BMS due to better vascular healing and re-endothelialization of stent struts as evidenced in an animal model. Recent studies show that second-generation DES with biodegradable polymer coating proved to have more efficacy in reducing target-vessel revascularization (TVR), target-lesion revascularization (TLR), in-stent late loss (ISLL), and late-stent thrombosis as compared to BMS. Studies also showed the higher efficacy of DES in complex lesion as compared to BMS. The latest novel agent bioresorbable scaffolds system (BRS) maintains cyclic pulsatility with fewer chances of vascular remodeling and IRS due to the removal of metallic meshwork in stents platform which serves as triggering agent for late-onset complications such as IRS and stent thrombosis. However, BRS requires best implantation techniques and struts size. The limitation to BRS is struts thickness because in early post-procedural period restenosis is due to vascular recoil property which is counteracted by a metallic scaffold of BMS and DES. If struts size of BRS is reduced, vascular recoil cannot be antagonized adequately. Second-generation BRS has achieved this property somehow. After a time, BRS disappears entirely due to resorption which can be followed up with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). IVUS and optical coherence tomography (OCT) can be used to install BRS appropriately. There is not much data available on the safety of BRS, but the idea of the metal-free stent that helped develop BRS is criticized because scaffold thrombosis has been reported. Recently, Brown et al. suggested that during BRS implantation, both pre-dilatation and post-dilatation with pressure over 20 ATM is mandatory for preventing acute vascular recoil, and better scaffold expansion, and lower rates of scaffold thrombosis which is best predicted by minimal luminal area on IVUS. While treating small-sized coronaries arteries, DES has low efficacy with an increased incidence of IRS due to thicker stent’s struts size and luminal loss. To overcome this issue and treating IRS secondary to BMS and DES, drug-eluting balloons (DEB) served the purpose with higher efficacy. In a meta-analysis, a combination treatment of de novo coronary artery disease patients with DEB+BMS was superior to BMS alone with a significant reduction in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and late lumen loss (LLL). However, DEB plus BMS combination was inferior to DES alone with higher rates of MACE, LLL or TLR.

摘要

血管成形术(无论是否置入支架)是一种非手术操作,用于打开因潜在动脉粥样硬化而堵塞或狭窄的冠状动脉。该操作包括通过肢体皮肤插入一根带有可充气球囊的导管,一旦导管穿过狭窄的动脉部位,就将球囊充气。它将动脉粥样硬化的管腔内斑块压向动脉壁,扩大管腔直径。从而使心肌的血流正常化,并通过缓解胸痛实现血管成形术或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的目标。PCI的概念是40年前随着“单纯球囊血管成形术”(POBA)(未置入支架)的引入而提出的。在20世纪80年代中期,由于血管回缩特性和球囊放气后再狭窄这一早期并发症,POBA的应用受到限制,这促使了裸金属支架(BMS)的发明。在该操作过程中,专业人员使用一种管状金属网,其支撑特性可抵消血管回缩特性,从而避免因血管回缩导致的POBA早期再狭窄。然而,长期来看,原位BMS会诱导血管壁应力、内皮连续性中断以及动脉中金属异物的永久存在,导致炎症伴纤维蛋白沉积,并促进肌成纤维细胞迁移,进而通过新生内膜增生机制导致支架内再狭窄(IRS)。这个问题促使了药物洗脱支架(DES)的发展。DES技术在支架的金属结构上使用抗增殖药物涂层,与BMS相比,其优点是能减少新生内膜增生和支架再狭窄。晚期支架血栓形成也与DES有关,这是由于动脉愈合受损,第一代DES更常见的情况是缺乏再内皮化以及因潜在慢性炎症导致纤维蛋白沉积。第二代DES有一层生物相容性聚合物额外涂层,具有更好的内皮愈合能力。在动物模型中已证明,钴铬依维莫司洗脱支架(第二代DES)比紫杉醇洗脱支架(第一代DES)和BMS更安全,因为其支架支柱具有更好的血管愈合和再内皮化能力。最近的研究表明,与BMS相比,具有可生物降解聚合物涂层的第二代DES在减少靶血管再血管化(TVR)、靶病变再血管化(TLR)、支架内晚期丢失(ISLL)和晚期支架血栓形成方面更有效。研究还表明,与BMS相比,DES在复杂病变中疗效更高。最新的新型生物可吸收支架系统(BRS)由于去除了支架平台中的金属网,保持了循环搏动性,减少了血管重塑和IRS的发生几率,而金属网是IRS和支架血栓形成等迟发性并发症的触发因素。然而,BRS需要最佳的植入技术和支柱尺寸。BRS的局限性在于支柱厚度,因为在术后早期,再狭窄是由于血管回缩特性,而BMS和DES的金属支架可抵消这一特性。如果BRS的支柱尺寸减小,血管回缩就无法得到充分对抗。第二代BRS在某种程度上实现了这一特性。一段时间后,BRS会因吸收而完全消失,这可以通过血管内超声(IVUS)进行随访。IVUS和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)可用于正确安装BRS。关于BRS安全性的数据不多,但有助于开发BRS的无金属支架理念受到批评,因为已有支架血栓形成的报道。最近,布朗等人建议,在植入BRS期间,预扩张和后扩张时压力超过20个大气压对于预防急性血管回缩、实现更好的支架扩张以及降低支架血栓形成发生率是必不可少的,而这可以通过IVUS上的最小管腔面积进行最佳预测。在治疗小尺寸冠状动脉时,由于支架支柱尺寸较厚和管腔丢失,DES疗效较低且IRS发生率增加。为克服这一问题并治疗BMS和DES继发的IRS,药物洗脱球囊(DEB)发挥了作用,疗效更高。在一项荟萃分析中,初发冠状动脉疾病患者采用DEB+BMS联合治疗优于单纯BMS,可显著降低主要不良心脏事件(MACE)和晚期管腔丢失(LLL)。然而,DEB加BMS联合治疗不如单纯DES,MACE、LLL或TLR发生率更高。

相似文献

1
Angioplasty血管成形术
2
Coronary Stents(Archived)冠状动脉支架(存档)
3
Coronary Artery Stents(Archived)冠状动脉支架(存档)
4
First results of the DEB-AMI (drug eluting balloon in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) trial: a multicenter randomized comparison of drug-eluting balloon plus bare-metal stent versus bare-metal stent versus drug-eluting stent in primary percutaneous coronary intervention with 6-month angiographic, intravascular, functional, and clinical outcomes.DEB-AMI(药物洗脱球囊用于急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死)试验的初步结果:药物洗脱球囊联合金属裸支架与金属裸支架和药物洗脱支架在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的多中心随机比较:6 个月的血管造影、血管内、功能和临床结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jun 19;59(25):2327-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.027. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
5
Intracoronary Stents冠状动脉内支架
6
7
Intravascular ultrasound to guide percutaneous coronary interventions: an evidence-based analysis.血管内超声引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(12):1-97. Epub 2006 Apr 1.
8
9
Drug-eluting balloons with provisional bail-out or adjunctive stenting in coronary artery lesions-a systematic review and meta-analysis.冠状动脉病变中采用临时补救或辅助支架置入术的药物洗脱球囊——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2018 Apr;8(2):121-136. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.10.09.
10
Optical coherence tomography study of healing characteristics of paclitaxel-eluting balloons vs. everolimus-eluting stents for in-stent restenosis: the SEDUCE (Safety and Efficacy of a Drug elUting balloon in Coronary artery rEstenosis) randomised clinical trial.光学相干断层扫描研究紫杉醇洗脱球囊与依维莫司洗脱支架治疗支架内再狭窄的愈合特征:SEDUCE(药物洗脱球囊在冠状动脉再狭窄中的安全性和有效性)随机临床试验。
EuroIntervention. 2014 Aug;10(4):439-48. doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I4A77.