• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种植体支持的整体式氧化锆全冠的断裂强度与适合精度

Fracture Strength and Precision of Fit of Implant-Retained Monolithic Zirconia Crowns.

作者信息

Moilanen Pauliina, Hjerppe Jenni, Lassila Lippo V J, Närhi Timo O

机构信息

1   Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Stomatognathic Physiology, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

2   Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

J Oral Implantol. 2018 Oct;44(5):330-334. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00249. Epub 2018 May 15.

DOI:10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00249
PMID:29763362
Abstract

New monolithic zirconia materials can be used to fabricate full-contour fixed dental prostheses with the computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) method. The aim of this study was to examine the fracture strength and precision of fit of screw-retained monolithic zirconia crowns made directly on implants or by cementing on prefabricated titanium (Ti) bases. Monolithic screw-retained implant crowns (n = 6) were produced by CAD/CAM method using partially (PSZ) and fully stabilized (FSZ) zirconia. Industrially produced zirconia crowns were used as a reference. A lateral incisor study model was made onto an implant replica. Crowns were produced either directly on the implant or through cementing on a prefabricated titanium base (PSZ+Ti, FSZ+Ti). The crowns were tightened to implant replicas with a torque of 35 Ncm. The gap between the replica and the abutment or crown was measured from ×400 scanning electron microscope images for precision of fit. Mechanical testing until failure was completed with a universal testing machine with loading angle of 45°. Statistical analysis was performed (analysis of variance). Mean (±SD) failure loads were 259 ± 23 (PSZ), 140 ± 13 (FSZ), 453 ± 25 (PSZ+Ti), 439 ± 41 (FSZ+Ti), and 290 ± 39 (Procera). Mean (±SD) gap values were 2.2 ± 0.2 (PSZ), 2.5 ± 1.0 (FSZ), 7.0 ± 1.0 (PSZ+Ti), 7.7 ± 1.6 (FSZ+Ti), and 6.7 ± 1.7 (Procera). Monolithic zirconia crowns with a Ti base clearly show higher fracture strengths than the crowns fixed directly on the implant surface. Better marginal fit can be achieved with direct zirconia crowns than with crowns on a titanium base or industrially produced zirconia crowns.

摘要

新型整体式氧化锆材料可用于通过计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)方法制作全冠固定义齿。本研究的目的是检验直接制作在种植体上或通过粘结在预制钛(Ti)基台上的螺丝固位整体式氧化锆冠的断裂强度和适合精度。使用部分稳定(PSZ)和完全稳定(FSZ)氧化锆,通过CAD/CAM方法制作整体式螺丝固位种植体冠(n = 6)。使用工业生产的氧化锆冠作为对照。在种植体复制体上制作侧切牙研究模型。冠要么直接制作在种植体上,要么通过粘结在预制钛基台上(PSZ+Ti、FSZ+Ti)。用35 Ncm的扭矩将冠拧紧到种植体复制体上。从×400扫描电子显微镜图像测量复制体与基台或冠之间的间隙,以评估适合精度。使用加载角度为45°的万能试验机进行直至破坏的力学测试。进行统计分析(方差分析)。平均(±标准差)破坏载荷分别为259±23(PSZ)、140±13(FSZ)、453±25(PSZ+Ti)、439±41(FSZ+Ti)和290±39(Procera)。平均(±标准差)间隙值分别为2.2±0.2(PSZ)、2.5±1.0(FSZ)、7.0±1.0(PSZ+Ti)、7.7±1.6(FSZ+Ti)和6.7±1.7(Procera)。带有钛基台的整体式氧化锆冠的断裂强度明显高于直接固定在种植体表面的冠。直接制作的氧化锆冠比钛基台上的冠或工业生产的氧化锆冠能获得更好的边缘适合性。

相似文献

1
Fracture Strength and Precision of Fit of Implant-Retained Monolithic Zirconia Crowns.种植体支持的整体式氧化锆全冠的断裂强度与适合精度
J Oral Implantol. 2018 Oct;44(5):330-334. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00249. Epub 2018 May 15.
2
Mechanical stability of fully personalized, abutment-free zirconia implant crowns on a novel implant-crown interface.新型种植体-冠界面上全个性化、无基台氧化锆种植体冠的机械稳定性。
J Dent. 2022 Jun;121:104121. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104121. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
3
Fracture Resistance of Titanium, Zirconia, and Ceramic-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Implant Abutments Supporting CAD/CAM Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns After Aging.钛、氧化锆和陶瓷增强聚醚醚酮种植体基台支持 CAD/CAM 整体式氧化锂硅陶瓷冠在老化后的抗折强度。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 May/June;34(3):622–630. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7036. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
4
Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems.钛和氧化锆种植体基台烤瓷冠的抗折裂性能:全瓷单体冠与手工堆塑烤瓷冠的比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Nov-Dec;27(6):1448-55.
5
Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Supported by Titanium and Ti-Base Abutments: The Effect of Chewing Simulation and Thermocyclic Aging.CAD/CAM 整体氧化锆冠在钛和钛基基台支持下的抗折裂性能:咀嚼模拟和热循环老化的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023 Mar-Apr;38(2):328-333. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9693.
6
Marginal discrepancy of monolithic and veneered all-ceramic crowns on titanium and zirconia implant abutments before and after adhesive cementation: a scanning electron microscopy analysis.全瓷单冠和贴面全瓷冠在钛和氧化锆种植体基台黏接前后的边缘间隙:扫描电子显微镜分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Mar-Apr;28(2):480-7. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2759.
7
Mechanical stability of zirconia meso-abutments bonded to titanium bases restored with different monolithic all-ceramic crowns.氧化锆中桥接基台与不同整体式全瓷冠修复的钛基的机械稳定性。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 September/October;34(5):1091–1097. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7431. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
8
Failure Load of Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Single Crowns Bonded to Ti-base Abutments versus to Customized Ceramic Abutments after Fatigue.疲劳后整体式二硅酸锂植入物支持的单冠与钛基基台粘结与定制陶瓷基台粘结的失败负荷。
J Prosthodont. 2022 Feb;31(2):136-146. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13369. Epub 2021 May 4.
9
Fracture Resistance Behaviors of Titanium-Zirconium and Zirconia Implants.钛锆及氧化锆种植体的抗折性能
J Prosthodont. 2022 Jun;31(5):441-446. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13440. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
10
Stiffness, strength, and failure modes of implant-supported monolithic lithium disilicate crowns: influence of titanium and zirconia abutments.种植体支持的整体式二硅酸锂全冠的硬度、强度及失效模式:钛基台和氧化锆基台的影响
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(6):1272-9. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3975.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of manufacturing methods and use of CoCr-based abutments on vertical and horizontal marginal fit and torque loss in implant-supported prostheses.钴铬基基台的制造方法及使用对种植支持式修复体垂直和水平边缘适合性及扭矩损失的影响。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2025 May 30;33:e20240589. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2024-0589. eCollection 2025.
2
One-Piece Monolithic Zirconia Single Tooth Implant-Supported Restorations in the Posterior Region: A 1-Year Prospective Case Series Study.后牙区一体式整体氧化锆单颗种植体支持式修复体:一项为期1年的前瞻性病例系列研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 Apr;36(4):460-470. doi: 10.1111/clr.14396. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
3
Effect of cement type on vertical marginal discrepancy and residual excess cement in screwmentable and cementable implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns.
不同种类粘结剂对螺钉固位与粘结固位的种植体支持式整体氧化锆冠修复体边缘垂直向间隙和残留多余粘结剂的影响。
Odontology. 2024 Oct;112(4):1221-1230. doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-00938-w. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
4
Titanium Base Abutments in Implant Prosthodontics: A Literature Review.种植修复学中的钛基台:文献综述
Eur J Dent. 2022 Feb;16(1):49-55. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735423. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
5
Patient Satisfaction with Implant-Supported Monolithic and Partially Veneered Zirconia Restorations.患者对种植体支持的整体式和部分贴面氧化锆修复体的满意度。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Feb 6;2021:6692939. doi: 10.1155/2021/6692939. eCollection 2021.
6
Ceramic Materials and Technologies Applied to Digital Works in Implant-Supported Restorative Dentistry.应用于种植支持修复牙科数字作品的陶瓷材料与技术
Materials (Basel). 2020 Apr 22;13(8):1964. doi: 10.3390/ma13081964.
7
Strength and aging resistance of monolithic zirconia: an update to current knowledge.整体式氧化锆的强度与抗老化性能:当前知识的更新
Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2020 Dec;56(1):1-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2019.09.002. Epub 2019 Nov 14.