Scarlet Sara, Rogers Selwyn O
A fifth-year general surgery resident and member of the hospital ethics committee at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
The chief of trauma and acute care surgery at the University of Chicago, where he is also the director of the new trauma center.
AMA J Ethics. 2018 May 1;20(5):483-491. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.5.msoc2-1805.
In the past, trauma centers have almost exclusively focused on caring for patients who suffer from physical trauma resulting from violence. However, as clinicians' perspectives on violence shift, violence prevention and intervention have been increasingly recognized as integral aspects of trauma care. Hospital-based violence intervention programs are an emerging strategy for ending the cycle of violence by focusing efforts in the trauma center context. These programs, with their multipronged, community-based approach, have shown great potential in reducing trauma recidivism by leveraging the acute experience of violence as an opportunity to introduce services and assess risk of re-injury. In this article, we explore the evolving role of trauma centers and consider their institutional duty to address violence broadly, including prevention.
过去,创伤中心几乎完全专注于照顾因暴力导致身体创伤的患者。然而,随着临床医生对暴力的看法发生转变,暴力预防和干预越来越被视为创伤护理的重要组成部分。基于医院的暴力干预项目是一种新兴策略,通过在创伤中心的背景下集中努力来打破暴力循环。这些项目采用多方面、基于社区的方法,通过利用暴力的急性体验作为引入服务和评估再次受伤风险的机会,在减少创伤复发方面显示出巨大潜力。在本文中,我们探讨了创伤中心不断演变的作用,并考虑它们在广泛应对暴力(包括预防)方面的机构责任。