Suppr超能文献

在开始长效抗胆碱能药物(LAMA)单药治疗或LAMA+长效β2受体激动剂(LABA)联合治疗前一年慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的特征及医疗资源使用情况:一项美国数据库研究

Characteristics and health care resource use of subjects with COPD in the year before initiating LAMA monotherapy or LAMA+LABA combination therapy: A U.S. database study.

作者信息

Nagar Saurabh, Patel Jeetvan, Stanford Richard H

机构信息

GlaxoSmithKline.

出版信息

Manag Care. 2018 May;27(5):40-47.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To characterize subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) newly initiated on long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) or dual LAMA/long-acting β2-adrenergic agonist (LABA) therapy.

DESIGN

This pilot/preliminary analysis was a retrospective crosssectional study of subjects with COPD from the Optum Impact National Managed Care Benchmark Database.

METHODOLOGY

Subjects with at least one LAMA prescription in the index period (July 2008-June 2009) were included and stratified by treatment. Data were collected in the year before the index date and included comorbidities, medication use, COPD-related costs, health care resource use, and exacerbations.

RESULTS

Of 5,311 eligible subjects, 2,057 initiated LAMA therapy (LAMA cohort) and 191 initiated LAMA+LABA therapy (LAMA+LABA cohort). The Charlson comorbidity index was slightly lower in the LAMA+LABA cohort than the LAMA cohort (mean±SD: 0.63±1.13 vs. 0.66±1.28), but the number of prescriptions was higher (mean±SD: 42.9±23.2 vs. 30.5±27.2). The LAMA+LABA cohort had higher short-acting inhaled β2 agonist (56.0% vs. 35.7%), oral corticosteroid (37.7% vs. 32.6%), and home oxygen therapy use (14.1% vs. 3.2%) than the LAMA cohort. Total medical costs were greater in the LAMA+LABA cohort than the LAMA cohort (mean±SD: $3,320.40±4085.9 vs. $1,226.20±3602.9), although emergency department ($11.00±66.8 vs. $30.70±259.2) and outpatient visit ($39.60±163.1 vs. $41.70±424.3) costs were lower. Resource use and exacerbation incidence were similar between cohorts.

CONCLUSION

In this first look, subjects with COPD initiating LAMA or LAMA+LABA therapy exhibited different clinical and resource use characteristics in the year before treatment. Subjects receiving LAMA+LABA were older, with higher COPD co-medication use, more prescriptions, and associated higher pharmacy costs compared with subjects initiating LAMA. These differences may reflect a higher severity of COPD in those starting LABA+LAMA treatment.

摘要

目的

对新开始使用长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)或LAMA/长效β2肾上腺素能激动剂(LABA)联合治疗的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者进行特征描述。

设计

这项试点/初步分析是一项对来自Optum Impact国家管理式医疗基准数据库的COPD患者进行的回顾性横断面研究。

方法

纳入在索引期(2008年7月至2009年6月)至少有一张LAMA处方的患者,并按治疗方式进行分层。在索引日期前一年收集数据,包括合并症、药物使用、COPD相关费用、医疗资源使用和病情加重情况。

结果

在5311名符合条件的患者中,2057人开始LAMA治疗(LAMA队列),191人开始LAMA+LABA治疗(LAMA+LABA队列)。LAMA+LABA队列的Charlson合并症指数略低于LAMA队列(均值±标准差:0.63±1.13对0.66±1.28),但处方数量更多(均值±标准差:42.9±23.2对30.5±27.2)。LAMA+LABA队列短效吸入β2激动剂(56.0%对35.7%)、口服糖皮质激素(37.7%对32.6%)和家庭氧疗的使用比例高于LAMA队列(14.1%对3.2%)。LAMA+LABA队列的总医疗费用高于LAMA队列(均值±标准差:3320.40±4085.9美元对1226.20±3602.9美元),尽管急诊科费用(11.00±66.8美元对30.70±259.2美元)和门诊就诊费用(39.60±163.1美元对41.70±424.3美元)较低。队列之间的资源使用和病情加重发生率相似。

结论

初步观察显示,开始LAMA或LAMA+LABA治疗的COPD患者在治疗前一年表现出不同的临床和资源使用特征。与开始LAMA治疗的患者相比,接受LAMA+LABA治疗的患者年龄更大,COPD联合用药更多,处方更多,药房费用更高。这些差异可能反映了开始LABA+LAMA治疗的患者中COPD的严重程度更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验