• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在英格兰的初级保健环境中,对开始使用单吸入长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂/长效β激动剂双重治疗的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者进行特征描述。

Characterization of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Initiating Single-Inhaler Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist/Long-Acting β-Agonist Dual Therapy in a Primary Care Setting in England.

机构信息

Value Evidence and Outcomes, Epidemiology, GSK, R&D Global Medical, Brentford, Middlesex, UK.

Real-world Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK.

出版信息

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Aug 10;17:1781-1795. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S365480. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.2147/COPD.S365480
PMID:35983168
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9379125/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Treatment pathways of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receiving single-inhaler dual therapies remain unclear. We aimed to describe characteristics, prescribed treatments, healthcare resource use (HCRU) and costs of patients with COPD who initiated single-inhaler long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β-agonist (LAMA/LABA) dual therapy in primary care in England.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective study using linked data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum and Hospital Episode Statistics datasets. Patients with COPD with ≥1 single-inhaler LAMA/LABA prescription between June 2015 and December 2018 (index) were included. Demographic and clinical characteristics, prescribed treatments, HCRU and costs were evaluated in the 12 months pre-index. Data are presented for patients not receiving concomitant inhaled corticosteroids at index (non-triple users).

RESULTS

Of 10,991 patients initiating LAMA/LABA, 9888 were non-triple users, of whom 21.3% (n=2109) received aclidinium bromide/formoterol, 18.1% (n=1785) received indacaterol/glycopyrronium, 12.0% (n=1189) received tiotropium bromide/olodaterol and 48.6% (n=4805) received umeclidinium/vilanterol. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar across indexed therapies. LAMA monotherapy was the most frequently prescribed respiratory therapy at 12 (18.4-25.8% of patients) and 3 months (23.9-33.7% of patients) pre-index across indexed therapies; 42.5-59.0% of patients were prescribed no respiratory therapy at these time points. COPD-related HCRU during the 12 months pre-index was similar across indexed therapies (general practitioner consultations: 62.0-68.6% patients; inpatient stays: 19.3-26.1% patients). Pre-index COPD-related costs were similar across indexed therapies, with inpatient stays representing the highest contribution. Mean total direct annual COPD-related costs ranged from £805-£1187.

CONCLUSION

Characteristics of patients newly initiating single-inhaler LAMA/LABA dual therapy were highly consistent across indexed therapies. As half of non-triple users were not receiving respiratory therapy one year prior to LAMA/LABA initiation, there may be an opportunity for early optimization of treatment to relieve clinical burden versus current prescribing patterns in primary care in England.

摘要

目的

接受单吸入器双重治疗的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的治疗途径仍不清楚。我们旨在描述在英格兰初级保健中开始使用单吸入器长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂/长效β-激动剂(LAMA/LABA)双重治疗的 COPD 患者的特征、规定的治疗方法、医疗保健资源使用(HCRU)和成本。

方法

使用来自临床实践研究数据链接 Aurum 和医院发病统计数据集的链接数据进行回顾性研究。纳入 2015 年 6 月至 2018 年 12 月期间至少有一次单吸入器 LAMA/LABA 处方的 COPD 患者(索引)。在索引前 12 个月评估人口统计学和临床特征、规定的治疗方法、HCRU 和成本。数据适用于索引时未同时使用吸入性皮质类固醇的患者(非三联使用者)。

结果

在开始使用 LAMA/LABA 的 10991 名患者中,9888 名患者为非三联使用者,其中 21.3%(n=2109)接受了溴化阿地溴铵/福莫特罗,18.1%(n=1785)接受了茚达特罗/格隆溴铵,12.0%(n=1189)接受了噻托溴铵/奥洛达特罗,48.6%(n=4805)接受了乌美溴铵/维兰特罗。各索引治疗的人口统计学和临床特征相似。在索引治疗中,LAMA 单药治疗在索引前 12 个月(18.4-25.8%的患者)和 3 个月(23.9-33.7%的患者)最常规定为呼吸治疗;在这些时间点,42.5-59.0%的患者未规定任何呼吸治疗。在索引前 12 个月期间,与 COPD 相关的 HCRU 在各索引治疗中相似(全科医生就诊:62.0-68.6%的患者;住院:19.3-26.1%的患者)。与 COPD 相关的索引前成本在各索引治疗中相似,住院治疗占比最高。每年与 COPD 相关的总直接费用中位数范围为 805-1187 英镑。

结论

新开始使用单吸入器 LAMA/LABA 双重治疗的患者的特征在各索引治疗中高度一致。由于一半的非三联使用者在开始 LAMA/LABA 治疗前一年没有接受呼吸治疗,因此与目前在英格兰初级保健中的处方模式相比,可能有机会尽早优化治疗以减轻临床负担。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22ee/9379125/386b4bbb39f0/COPD-17-1781-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22ee/9379125/6fcdb54a7a57/COPD-17-1781-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22ee/9379125/2574bf39890a/COPD-17-1781-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22ee/9379125/0d9b688e11be/COPD-17-1781-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22ee/9379125/6f67b7ce3b53/COPD-17-1781-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22ee/9379125/386b4bbb39f0/COPD-17-1781-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22ee/9379125/6fcdb54a7a57/COPD-17-1781-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22ee/9379125/2574bf39890a/COPD-17-1781-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22ee/9379125/0d9b688e11be/COPD-17-1781-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22ee/9379125/6f67b7ce3b53/COPD-17-1781-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22ee/9379125/386b4bbb39f0/COPD-17-1781-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Characterization of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Initiating Single-Inhaler Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist/Long-Acting β-Agonist Dual Therapy in a Primary Care Setting in England.在英格兰的初级保健环境中,对开始使用单吸入长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂/长效β激动剂双重治疗的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者进行特征描述。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Aug 10;17:1781-1795. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S365480. eCollection 2022.
2
Treatment Patterns, Healthcare Utilization and Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Initiating Single-Inhaler Long-Acting β-Agonist/Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist Dual Therapy in Primary Care in England.在英国初级保健中,接受单吸入长效β激动剂/长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂双重治疗的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的治疗模式、医疗保健利用和临床结局。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023 Mar 5;18:231-245. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S389281. eCollection 2023.
3
Characterisation of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease initiating single-device inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β-agonist dual therapy in a primary care setting in England.在英格兰的初级保健环境中,对接受单一装置吸入皮质类固醇/长效β激动剂双重治疗的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者进行特征描述。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2022 Sep;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001243.
4
Comparative Effectiveness of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Inhaled Corticosteroid/Long-Acting β-Agonist in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in a Primary Care Setting in England.在英国初级保健环境中,乌美溴铵/维兰特罗与吸入性皮质类固醇/长效β激动剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疗效比较。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023 Apr 19;18:643-659. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S405498. eCollection 2023.
5
Treatment pathways, economic burden and clinical outcomes in new users of inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting B-agonist dual therapy with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a primary care setting in England: a retrospective cohort study.在英国初级保健环境中,慢性阻塞性肺疾病新使用吸入皮质类固醇/长效β激动剂双联治疗的治疗途径、经济负担和临床结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 7;14(2):e072361. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072361.
6
Efficacy of Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate Metered Dose Inhaler (BGF MDI) Versus Other Inhaled Corticosteroid/Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist/Long-Acting β-Agonist (ICS/LAMA/LABA) Triple Combinations in COPD: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis.布地奈德/格隆溴铵/富马酸福莫特罗干粉吸入剂(BGF MDI)对比其他吸入性皮质类固醇/长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂/长效β激动剂(ICS/LAMA/LABA)三联复方制剂治疗 COPD 的疗效:系统文献评价和网络荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2020 Jun;37(6):2956-2975. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01311-3. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
7
Characteristics of New Users of Single- and Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy for COPD in Primary Care in England.英国初级医疗中单药和多药三联疗法治疗 COPD 的新使用者的特征。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Jun 22;17:1455-1466. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S338436. eCollection 2022.
8
Risk Assessment of Acute Myocardial Infarction and Stroke Associated with Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists, Alone or in Combination, versus Long-Acting beta2-Agonists.长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂、长效β2-激动剂单独或联合应用与急性心肌梗死和卒中风险评估。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Aug 2;17:1715-1733. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S363997. eCollection 2022.
9
Comparative Effectiveness of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium on Moderate-to-Severe Exacerbations in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Clinical Practice in England.在英国临床实践中,乌美溴铵/维兰特罗对比茚达特罗/格隆溴铵治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中重度加重的疗效比较。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023 Sep 15;18:2039-2054. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S408688. eCollection 2023.
10
Characteristics of Users and New Initiators of Single- and Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Germany.德国慢性阻塞性肺疾病单吸入器和多吸入器三联疗法使用者及新启用者的特征
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024 Apr 17;19:945-956. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S431291. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium on Moderate-to-Severe Exacerbations in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Clinical Practice in England.在英国临床实践中,乌美溴铵/维兰特罗对比茚达特罗/格隆溴铵治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中重度加重的疗效比较。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023 Sep 15;18:2039-2054. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S408688. eCollection 2023.
2
Treatment Patterns, Healthcare Utilization and Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Initiating Single-Inhaler Long-Acting β-Agonist/Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist Dual Therapy in Primary Care in England.在英国初级保健中,接受单吸入长效β激动剂/长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂双重治疗的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的治疗模式、医疗保健利用和临床结局。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023 Mar 5;18:231-245. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S389281. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparisons of exacerbations and mortality among LAMA/LABA combinations in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.比较稳定型慢性阻塞性肺疾病中 LAMA/LABA 联合治疗的加重和死亡率:系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Respir Res. 2020 Nov 25;21(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01540-8.
2
Prevalence and attributable health burden of chronic respiratory diseases, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.1990-2017 年慢性呼吸道疾病的流行情况和可归因健康负担:2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Jun;8(6):585-596. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30105-3.
3
Economic Burden of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Systematic Literature Review.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)经济负担:系统文献回顾。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Feb 26;15:439-460. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S234942. eCollection 2020.
4
Systematic review and network meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler in comparison with other long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β-agonist fixed-dose combinations in COPD.系统评价和网络荟萃分析比较甘罗溴铵/福莫特罗富马酸盐定量吸入器与其他长效抗胆碱能药物/长效β-激动剂固定剂量复方制剂在 COPD 中的疗效和安全性。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2019 Jan-Dec;13:1753466619894502. doi: 10.1177/1753466619894502.
5
Data resource profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum.数据资源简介:临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)奥鲁姆
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Dec 1;48(6):1740-1740g. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz034.
6
What is early COPD and why is it important?什么是早期 COPD 以及为什么它很重要?
Eur Respir J. 2018 Dec 6;52(6). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01448-2018. Print 2018 Dec.
7
Genetic analysis of common variants in the ZNF804A gene with schizophrenia and major depressive disorder.ZNF804A基因常见变异与精神分裂症和重度抑郁症的遗传分析。
Psychiatr Genet. 2018 Feb;28(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/YPG.0000000000000185.
8
Validation of asthma recording in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)中哮喘记录的验证
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 11;7(8):e017474. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017474.
9
Patient coping strategies in COPD across disease severity and quality of life: a qualitative study.COPD 患者在疾病严重程度和生活质量方面的应对策略:一项定性研究。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2016 Sep 15;26:16051. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.51.
10
Comparative efficacy of fixed-dose combinations of long-acting muscarinic antagonists and long-acting β2-agonists: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂与长效β2受体激动剂固定剂量组合的比较疗效:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2016 Apr;10(2):89-104. doi: 10.1177/1753465815624612. Epub 2016 Jan 8.