Janda Monika, Armfield Nigel R, Kerr Gayle, Kurz Suzanne, Jackson Graeme, Currie Jason, Page Katie, Weaver Edward, Yazdani Anusch, Obermair Andreas
Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
School of Public Health, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Dec;58(6):690-695. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12824. Epub 2018 May 15.
Minimally invasive approaches to hysterectomy have been shown to be safe, effective and have recovery advantages over open hysterectomy, yet in Australia 36% of hysterectomies are still conducted by open surgery. In 2006, a survey of Australian gynaecological specialists found the main impediment to increasing laparoscopic hysterectomy to be a lack of surgical skills training opportunities. We resurveyed specialists to explore contemporary factors influencing surgeons' approaches to hysterectomy; 258 (estimated ~19%) provided analysable responses. Despite >50% of surveyed specialists wishing to practise laparoscopic hysterectomy in the future, lack of surgical skills, arising from the lack of training opportunities, remains the main impediment.
子宫切除术的微创方法已被证明是安全、有效的,并且与开放性子宫切除术相比具有恢复优势,但在澳大利亚,仍有36%的子宫切除术是通过开放手术进行的。2006年,一项对澳大利亚妇科专家的调查发现,增加腹腔镜子宫切除术的主要障碍是缺乏手术技能培训机会。我们再次对专家进行调查,以探讨影响外科医生子宫切除手术方式的当代因素;258名(估计约19%)专家提供了可分析的回复。尽管超过50%的受访专家希望未来能开展腹腔镜子宫切除术,但由于缺乏培训机会导致的手术技能不足仍然是主要障碍。