• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国住院患者腹腔镜子宫切除术:手术方式选择的趋势及相关因素

Inpatient Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in the United States: Trends and Factors Associated With Approach Selection.

作者信息

Desai Vrunda Bhavsar, Guo Xiaoyue M, Fan Linda, Wright Jason D, Xu Xiao

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Jan 1;24(1):151-158.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.830. Epub 2016 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.830
PMID:27614151
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To examine utilization patterns of different laparoscopic approaches in inpatient hysterectomy and identify patient and hospital characteristics associated with the selection of specific laparoscopic approaches.

DESIGN

Using data from the 2007 to 2012 National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS), we identified adult women undergoing inpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy for nonobstetric indications based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Benign cases were categorized based on laparoscopic approach, classified as total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH), or laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH). We assessed changes in the use of these approaches during 2007 to 2012, and used multinomial logistic regression to examine the association of patient and hospital characteristics with the choice of laparoscopic approach in 2012. The NIS sample weights were applied to generate nationally representative estimates.

DESIGN CLASSIFICATION

Retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification III).

SETTING

Hospital inpatient care nationwide.

PATIENTS

Female adult patients in the NIS database who underwent an inpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy between 2007 and 2012.

INTERVENTION

Inpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of the inpatient laparoscopic hysterectomies performed in 2012, 83.2% were for benign indications. The TLH approach accounted for 48.3% of all laparoscopic hysterectomies, followed by LAVH at 37.3% and LSH at 14.4%. Robotic assistance was reported in 45.0% of all cases and 72.3% of malignant hysterectomies. An examination of temporal trends during 2007 to 2012 demonstrates a shift in the laparoscopic approach from LAVH toward TLH, with a slight decrease in LSH. Patient race/ethnicity, income, indication for hysterectomy, and comorbid conditions, as well as hospital teaching status, urban/rural location, bed size, type of ownership, and geographic region, were significantly associated with the choice of laparoscopic approach.

CONCLUSION

Benign laparoscopic hysterectomy is increasingly performed as TLH rather than LAVH. In addition to clinical factors, the selection of laparoscopic approach is influenced by patient socioeconomic and hospital characteristics.

摘要

研究目的

探讨不同腹腔镜手术方式在住院子宫切除术中的应用模式,并确定与特定腹腔镜手术方式选择相关的患者及医院特征。

设计

利用2007年至2012年全国住院患者样本(NIS)的数据,我们根据国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本编码,确定了因非产科指征接受住院腹腔镜子宫切除术的成年女性。良性病例根据腹腔镜手术方式进行分类,分为全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)、腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术(LAVH)或腹腔镜次全子宫切除术(LSH)。我们评估了2007年至2012年期间这些手术方式的使用变化,并使用多项逻辑回归分析2012年患者及医院特征与腹腔镜手术方式选择之间的关联。应用NIS样本权重以生成具有全国代表性的估计值。

设计分类

回顾性研究(加拿大工作组分类III级)。

地点

全国范围内的医院住院护理。

患者

NIS数据库中2007年至2012年间接受住院腹腔镜子宫切除术的成年女性患者。

干预措施

住院腹腔镜子宫切除术。

测量指标及主要结果

2012年进行的住院腹腔镜子宫切除术中,83.2%为良性指征。TLH手术方式占所有腹腔镜子宫切除术的48.3%,其次是LAVH占37.3%,LSH占14.4%。所有病例中有45.0%以及恶性子宫切除术中有72.3%报告使用了机器人辅助。对2007年至2012年期间的时间趋势进行检查发现,腹腔镜手术方式从LAVH向TLH转变,LSH略有下降。患者种族/民族、收入、子宫切除指征、合并症,以及医院教学状况、城乡位置、床位规模、所有制类型和地理区域,均与腹腔镜手术方式的选择显著相关。

结论

良性腹腔镜子宫切除术越来越多地采用TLH而非LAVH。除临床因素外,腹腔镜手术方式的选择还受患者社会经济状况及医院特征的影响。

相似文献

1
Inpatient Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in the United States: Trends and Factors Associated With Approach Selection.美国住院患者腹腔镜子宫切除术:手术方式选择的趋势及相关因素
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Jan 1;24(1):151-158.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.830. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
2
Utilization of apical vaginal support procedures at time of inpatient hysterectomy performed for benign conditions: a national estimate.因良性疾病行住院子宫切除术时阴道顶端支持手术的应用情况:一项全国性评估。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;217(4):436.e1-436.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
3
Trends of Bilateral Salpingectomy During Vaginal Hysterectomy With and Without Laparoscopic Assistance Performed for Benign Indications in the United States.在美国,因良性指征行阴道子宫切除术时,双侧输卵管切除术在有和没有腹腔镜辅助情况下的趋势。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Nov-Dec;23(7):1063-1069.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.07.009. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
4
Nationwide trends in the utilization of and payments for hysterectomy in the United States among commercially insured women.美国商业保险女性子宫切除术的利用和支付的全国趋势。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;218(4):425.e1-425.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.218. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
5
Vesicoureteral Injury during Benign Hysterectomy: Minimally Invasive Laparoscopic Surgery versus Laparotomy.良性子宫切除术中的输尿管损伤:微创腹腔镜手术与剖腹手术比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Sep-Oct;27(6):1354-1362. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Nov 16.
6
Comparison of classic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy with total laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.经典筋膜内子宫次全切除术与全腹腔镜及腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术的比较。
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1998 Aug;5(3):253-60. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(98)80028-5.
7
Cost comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus standard laparoscopic hysterectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术与标准腹腔镜子宫切除术的成本比较
J Robot Surg. 2015 Dec;9(4):269-75. doi: 10.1007/s11701-015-0526-z. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
8
Comparative analysis of different laparoscopic hysterectomy procedures.不同腹腔镜子宫切除术的比较分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 May;285(5):1353-61. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-2140-2. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
9
A health maintenance organization's initial experience with laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy and endometrial ablation.
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1995 May;2(3):311-8. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)80114-8.
10
Surgical Trends and Time Frame Comparison of Surgical Types of Hysterectomy: A Nationwide, Population-based 15-year Study.手术趋势和子宫切除术手术类型的时间框架比较:一项全国范围内基于人群的 15 年研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jan;27(1):65-73.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.02.020. Epub 2019 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The feasibility and surgical outcomes of robotic vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic single port hysterectomy for benign gynecologic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人经阴道自然腔道内镜单孔子宫切除术治疗良性妇科疾病的可行性及手术效果:一项系统评价与Meta分析
AJOG Glob Rep. 2025 May 14;5(3):100512. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100512. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Analyzing 10-year time trends for Hysterectomy and Oophorectomy: Focus on Endometrial sampling and risk factors for Endometrial Cancer.分析子宫切除术和卵巢切除术的10年时间趋势:关注子宫内膜取样及子宫内膜癌的危险因素。
Malawi Med J. 2024 Jul 30;36(2):144-153. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v36i2.12. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Prophylaxis Effect of Metronidazole Vaginal Gel in Decreasing the Risk of Surgical Site Infections after Elective Hysterectomy.
甲硝唑阴道凝胶对降低择期子宫切除术后手术部位感染风险的预防作用
J Res Pharm Pract. 2023 Nov 27;12(1):9-14. doi: 10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_66_21. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
4
Is there a need for a technical certification system for gynecological robotic surgery? Questionnaire survey of members of the Japan Society of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Therapy.妇科机器人手术是否需要技术认证制度?日本妇科内窥镜和微创治疗学会成员问卷调查。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):1125-1131. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01520-8. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
5
Surgical Trend and Volume Effect on the Choice of Hysterectomy Benign Gynecologic Conditions.手术趋势和手术量对良性妇科疾病子宫切除术选择的影响
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2021 Jan 30;10(1):1-9. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_68_20. eCollection 2021 Jan-Mar.
6
Choosing a Surgical Access Point for Hysterectomy: A Paradigm Shift Over a 10-Year Span.子宫切除术手术入路点的选择:十年间的范式转变
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Nov 25;7:569895. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.569895. eCollection 2020.
7
Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans Found Within Procedural Scars: A Retrospective Review at a Tertiary Referral Cancer Center.在手术瘢痕内发现的隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤:三级转诊癌症中心的回顾性研究
Cureus. 2020 Sep 7;12(9):e10286. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10286.
8
Does Obesity and Procedure Type Increase the Risk of In-Hospital Mortality in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Report From the United States Hospitals.肥胖和手术类型会增加腹腔镜子宫切除术患者住院死亡率吗:来自美国医院的报告
Cureus. 2020 Jul 22;12(7):e9332. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9332.
9
Laparoscopic gynecological surgery in an adult woman with Becker muscular dystrophy performed with sevoflurane with cisatracurium anesthesia: A case report.成年女性 Becker 型肌营养不良症患者行腹腔镜妇科手术,采用七氟醚和顺式阿曲库铵麻醉:一例报告。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Apr;99(16):e19733. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019733.
10
Single-Incision Hysterectomy Outcomes With and Without Robotic Assistance.单切口子宫切除术在有或没有机器人辅助情况下的结果。
JSLS. 2019 Oct-Dec;23(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2019.00046.