Kridel Russell W H, Delaney Sean William
Facial Plastic Surgery Associates, Private Practice, Houston, Texas.
Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center in Houston, Houston, Texas.
Facial Plast Surg. 2018 Jun;34(3):298-311. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1654675. Epub 2018 May 15.
Septal perforation repair and septorhinoplasty (SRP) each present unique surgical challenges. However, in many instances, these procedures may be performed together successfully. In this study, the authors aim to determine the safety and effectiveness of combining primary or revision SRP and septal perforation repair via an open approach. A retrospective review was carried out of all consecutive patients who had SRP and septal perforation repair via an open approach between 1986 and 2017 in the senior author's practice. Perforation closure in surgery and at the patient's last follow-up, resolution of presenting symptoms, cosmetic results, and complications were analyzed. Records for 141 patients who had simultaneous septal perforation repair and SRP via an open approach, with a mean follow-up of 3.24 years, were reviewed. The mean anterior-posterior perforation dimension was 1.41 ± 0.89 cm, and the mean vertical perforation dimension was 1.16 ± 0.59 cm. The most common etiologies for septal perforation were previous SRP (35.4%) and septoplasty (24.1%). An overall 93.6%, perforation closure, 91.1% symptom relief, and 91.2% patient satisfaction with cosmetic results were achieved. Septal perforations under 1.5 cm in height were closed in 96.7% of patients as opposed to 71.4% of patients with perforations 1.5 cm or taller. Minor revision rhinoplasties were performed in 7.0% of patients. Postoperative infections were rare and noted in only two (1.4%) patients. In the largest study of its kind to date, the authors have shown that in experienced hands septal perforation repair may be performed simultaneously with primary or revision SRP via an open approach without compromising the perforation repair outcome. The vertical dimension of a septal perforation and presence of mucosa above and below a perforation are important considerations for the difficulty of a perforation closure, as septal mucosa is recruited from these locations in our technique of four-quadrant intranasal bipedicled mucosal advancement flap closure.
鼻中隔穿孔修复术和鼻中隔成形术(SRP)各自都带来独特的手术挑战。然而,在许多情况下,这些手术可以成功地一起进行。在本研究中,作者旨在确定通过开放入路联合初次或翻修SRP与鼻中隔穿孔修复术的安全性和有效性。对1986年至2017年间在资深作者的临床实践中通过开放入路进行SRP和鼻中隔穿孔修复术的所有连续患者进行了回顾性研究。分析了手术中的穿孔闭合情况、患者最后一次随访时的情况、症状缓解情况、美容效果和并发症。回顾了141例通过开放入路同时进行鼻中隔穿孔修复术和SRP的患者的记录,平均随访时间为3.24年。前后穿孔的平均尺寸为1.41±0.89厘米,垂直穿孔的平均尺寸为1.16±0.59厘米。鼻中隔穿孔最常见的病因是既往SRP(35.4%)和鼻中隔成形术(24.1%)。总体上实现了93.6%的穿孔闭合、91.1%的症状缓解和91.2%的患者对美容效果的满意度。高度小于1.5厘米的鼻中隔穿孔在96.7%的患者中得以闭合,而高度为1.5厘米或更高的穿孔患者中这一比例为71.4%。7.0%的患者进行了小范围的鼻整形术翻修。术后感染很少见,仅在两名(1.4%)患者中出现。在迄今为止同类研究中规模最大的研究中,作者表明,在经验丰富的医生手中,鼻中隔穿孔修复术可以通过开放入路与初次或翻修SRP同时进行,而不会影响穿孔修复的结果。鼻中隔穿孔的垂直尺寸以及穿孔上下黏膜的存在是穿孔闭合难度的重要考虑因素,因为在我们四象限鼻内双蒂黏膜推进皮瓣闭合技术中,鼻中隔黏膜是从这些部位获取的。