Ishikawa Kentaro, Chiba Tetsuhiro, Ooka Yoshihiko, Suzuki Eiichiro, Ogasawara Sadahisa, Maeda Takahiro, Yokoyama Masayuki, Inoue Masanori, Wakamatsu Toru, Kusakabe Yuko, Saito Tomoko, Tawada Akinobu, Arai Makoto, Kanda Tatsuo, Maruyama Hitoshi, Imazeki Fumio, Kato Naoya
Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Oncotarget. 2018 Apr 20;9(30):21560-21568. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25108.
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard procedure for treating Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage B hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, it is often carried out in the treatment of BCLC stage 0/A HCC for various reasons. This study aimed to elucidate the prognosis for BCLC stage 0/A HCC patients treated with TACE or with radiofrequency ablation (RFA).
The prognosis of 242 BCLC stage 0/A HCC patients within Milan criteria who underwent initially TACE or RFA were retrospectively analyzed using propensity score matching analysis.
The analyses of baseline patient characteristics revealed that the maximum tumor size and the proportion of BCLC stage A patients were significantly higher in patients treated with TACE than in those treated with RFA (<0.001 and 0.047, respectively). After adjusting these factors using propensity score matching (1:3 matching), patients treated with TACE (n=32) and those treated with RFA (n=96) were further analyzed. The local recurrence rate was significantly higher in the TACE group than in the RFA group (<0.001). However, the overall survival (OS) in HCC patients treated with TACE was comparable to that in HCC patients treated with RFA (1 year, 93.5 vs. 95.8%; 3 years, 75.4 vs. 85.8%; 5 years, 61.8 vs. 70.7%; =0.196). Multivariate analyses followed by univariate analyses revealed that serum bilirubin level (=0.032), serum albumin level (=0.008), HBV-DNA (=0.013), and tumor number (=0.021) were independent predictors of OS.
TACE can substitute RFA at least in some patients with BCLC 0/A HCC.
经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)是治疗巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)B期肝细胞癌(HCC)的标准方法。然而,由于各种原因,它也常用于BCLC 0/A期HCC的治疗。本研究旨在阐明接受TACE或射频消融(RFA)治疗的BCLC 0/A期HCC患者的预后情况。
采用倾向评分匹配分析方法,对242例符合米兰标准且最初接受TACE或RFA治疗的BCLC 0/A期HCC患者的预后进行回顾性分析。
基线患者特征分析显示,接受TACE治疗的患者最大肿瘤大小和BCLC A期患者比例显著高于接受RFA治疗的患者(分别为<0.001和0.047)。使用倾向评分匹配(1:3匹配)对这些因素进行调整后,对接受TACE治疗的患者(n = 32)和接受RFA治疗的患者(n = 96)进行了进一步分析。TACE组的局部复发率显著高于RFA组(<0.001)。然而,接受TACE治疗的HCC患者的总生存期(OS)与接受RFA治疗的HCC患者相当(1年,93.5%对95.8%;3年,75.4%对85.8%;5年,61.8%对70.7%;P = 0.196)。多因素分析后进行单因素分析显示,血清胆红素水平(P = 0.032)、血清白蛋白水平(P = 0.008)、乙肝病毒DNA(P = 0.013)和肿瘤数量(P = 0.021)是OS的独立预测因素。
至少在部分BCLC 0/A期HCC患者中,TACE可替代RFA。