Suppr超能文献

口服益生菌对鸡盲肠扁桃体Toll样受体基因表达的影响。

Effects of Oral Probiotic Feeding on Toll-Like Receptor Gene Expression of the Chicken's Cecal Tonsil.

作者信息

Asgari Fatemeh, Falak Reza, Teimourian Shahram, Pourakbari Babak, Ebrahimnezhad Salimeh, Shekarabi Mehdi

机构信息

Immunology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Rep Biochem Mol Biol. 2018 Apr;6(2):151-157.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It was proposed that probiotics may influence immune system through direct or indirect exposure. Direct exposure is mostly mediated by surface receptors. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are conserved molecular sensors which could be triggered via some pathogen associated structures, hence, modulate the immune responses. This study was conducted to elucidate the impact of lactobacillus acidophilus as a common probiotic on the expression level of TLRs in the chicken's cecal tonsil.

METHODS

Thirty one-day-old chicken were selected and separated into three groups as probiotic-fed, dairy-fed and control. In addition to commercial powder supply, each chicken in the probiotic-fed group received 109 CFU/Kg of L. acidophilus daily. While, chickens in the dairy-fed group were provided with commercial powder feed and sterile dairy milk. After 14 and 21 days of oral feeding the cecal tonsil was removed and the expression of TLR2, TLR4 and TLR5 were examined by real-time PCR.

RESULTS

At the age of 14-day, there was a slight upregulation in the expression levels of TLR2 (118.9%), TLR4 (129.6%) and TLR5 (123.7%) of the cecal tonsil in the probiotic-fed group; however, these alterations were not statistically significant. At the age of 21-day, a non-significant downregulation was observed in TLR expression level of both dairy-fed (TLR2, 85%; TLR4, 79.5%; and TLR5, 86.5%) and probiotic-fed (TLR2, 88.8%; TLR4, 81%; and TLR5, 87.2%) groups in comparison to controls.

CONCLUSION

The findings revealed that although the probiotic supplementation could be useful but it did not significantly affect innate immunity state through alteration of TLRs.

摘要

背景

有人提出益生菌可能通过直接或间接接触影响免疫系统。直接接触主要由表面受体介导。Toll样受体(TLRs)是保守的分子传感器,可通过一些病原体相关结构触发,从而调节免疫反应。本研究旨在阐明嗜酸乳杆菌作为一种常见益生菌对鸡盲肠扁桃体中TLRs表达水平的影响。

方法

选取30只1日龄雏鸡,分为益生菌喂养组、乳制品喂养组和对照组。除商业粉状饲料外,益生菌喂养组的每只鸡每天还接受109 CFU/Kg的嗜酸乳杆菌。而乳制品喂养组的鸡则提供商业粉状饲料和无菌牛奶。口服喂养14天和21天后,取出盲肠扁桃体,通过实时PCR检测TLR2、TLR4和TLR5的表达。

结果

在14日龄时,益生菌喂养组盲肠扁桃体中TLR2(118.9%)、TLR4(129.6%)和TLR5(123.7%)的表达水平略有上调;然而,这些变化无统计学意义。在21日龄时,与对照组相比,乳制品喂养组(TLR2,85%;TLR4,79.5%;TLR5,86.5%)和益生菌喂养组(TLR2,88.8%;TLR4,81%;TLR5,87.2%)的TLR表达水平均出现非显著性下调。

结论

研究结果表明,虽然补充益生菌可能有益,但它并未通过改变TLRs显著影响先天免疫状态。

相似文献

3
Characterization of host responses induced by Toll-like receptor ligands in chicken cecal tonsil cells.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2016 Jun;174:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
4
Effect of Low-Fat Diet in Obese Mice Lacking Toll-like Receptors.
Nutrients. 2018 Oct 9;10(10):1464. doi: 10.3390/nu10101464.
6
Effect of probiotics on intestinal mucosal immunity and ultrastructure of cecal tonsils of chickens.
Arch Anim Nutr. 2005 Aug;59(4):237-46. doi: 10.1080/17450390500216928.
8
Activation of Toll-Like Receptors by Live Gram-Negative Bacterial Pathogens Reveals Mitigation of TLR4 Responses and Activation of TLR5 by Flagella.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Nov 23;11:745325. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.745325. eCollection 2021.
10
Evaluation of the effects of probiotic supplementation from the neonatal period on innate immune development in infancy.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2006 Oct;36(10):1218-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2006.02552.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Direct-fed Microbials (DFM) and Poultry Genomics: A Synergistic Approach to Sustainable Antibiotic Free Farming.
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2025 Jun 14. doi: 10.1007/s12602-025-10618-y.
3
Inflammatory Modulation Effects of Probiotics: A Safe and Promising Modulator for Cancer Prevention.
Curr Microbiol. 2024 Sep 23;81(11):372. doi: 10.1007/s00284-024-03901-8.
4
Role of probiotics in managing various human diseases, from oral pathology to cancer and gastrointestinal diseases.
Front Microbiol. 2024 Jan 5;14:1296447. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1296447. eCollection 2023.
5
Effects of bacteriophage on Salmonella Enteritidis infection in broilers.
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 27;13(1):12198. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38791-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Probiotic feeding affects T cell populations in blood and lymphoid organs in chickens.
Benef Microbes. 2016 Nov 30;7(5):669-675. doi: 10.3920/BM2016.0014. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
2
Immunomodulatory activity and control of Salmonella Enteritidis colonization in the intestinal tract of chickens by Lactobacillus based probiotic.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2015 Sep 15;167(1-2):64-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Jun 14.
4
8
Regulation of intestinal homeostasis and immunity with probiotic lactobacilli.
Trends Immunol. 2013 May;34(5):208-15. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
9
An update on the use and investigation of probiotics in health and disease.
Gut. 2013 May;62(5):787-96. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302504. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
10
The role of intestinal microbiota and the immune system.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013 Feb;17(3):323-33.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验