• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

只有婴儿更常被抱在左侧吗?如果是这样,为什么?用一个婴儿、一个花瓶和两个嵌合体测试来检验注意力 - 情感假设,一个测试是“情感性的”,另一个不是。

Are only infants held more often on the left? If so, why? Testing the attention-emotion hypothesis with an infant, a vase, and two chimeric tests, one "emotional," one not.

作者信息

Harris Lauren Julius, Cárdenas Rodrigo A, Stewart Nathaniel D, Almerigi Jason B

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , Michigan State University , East Lansing , MI , USA.

b Department of Psychology , The Pennsylvania State University , University Park , PA , USA.

出版信息

Laterality. 2019 Jan;24(1):65-97. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2018.1475482. Epub 2018 May 16.

DOI:10.1080/1357650X.2018.1475482
PMID:29768092
Abstract

Most adults, especially women, hold infants and dolls but not books or packages on the left side. One reason may be that attention is more often leftward in response to infants, unlike emotionally neutral objects like books and packages. Women's stronger bias may reflect greater responsiveness to infants. Previously, we tested the attention hypothesis by comparing women's side-of-hold of a doll, book, and package with direction-of-attention on the Chimeric Faces Test (CFT) [Harris, L. J., Cárdenas, R. A., Spradlin, Jr., M. P., & Almerigi, J. B. (2010). Why are infants held on the left? A test of the attention hypothesis with a doll, a book, and a bag. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 15(5), 548-571. doi:10.1080/13576500903064018]. Only the doll was held more often to the left, and only for the doll were side-of-hold and CFT scores related, with left-holders showing a stronger left-attention bias than right-holders. In the current study, we tested men and women with a doll and the CFT along with a vase as a neutral object and a "non-emotional" chimeric test. Again, only the doll was held more often to the left, but now, although both chimeric tests showed left-attention biases, scores were unrelated to side-of-hold. Nor were there sex differences. The results support left-hold selectivity but not the attention hypothesis, with or without the element of emotion. They also raise questions about the contribution of sex-of-holder. We conclude with suggestions for addressing these issues.

摘要

大多数成年人,尤其是女性,会把婴儿和玩偶抱在左侧,而不是把书或包裹抱在左侧。一个原因可能是,与书和包裹等情感中性的物品不同,人们对婴儿的注意力更多地指向左侧。女性更强的偏好可能反映出她们对婴儿有更高的反应性。之前,我们通过比较女性抱玩偶、书和包裹的位置与在嵌合面孔测试(CFT)中的注意力方向,来检验注意力假说[哈里斯,L.J.,卡德纳斯,R.A.,小斯普拉德林,M.P.,&阿尔梅里吉,J.B.(2010年)。为什么婴儿被抱在左侧?用玩偶、书和袋子对注意力假说的检验。《偏侧性:身体、大脑和认知的不对称性》,15(5),548 - 571。doi:10.1080/13576500903064018]。只有玩偶更多地被抱在左侧,而且只有抱玩偶时,抱持位置和CFT分数才相关,左抱者比右抱者表现出更强的左注意力偏好。在当前的研究中,我们用一个玩偶和CFT对男性和女性进行了测试,同时还使用了一个花瓶作为中性物品和一个“非情感性”的嵌合测试。同样,只有玩偶更多地被抱在左侧,但现在,尽管两个嵌合测试都显示出左注意力偏好,但分数与抱持位置无关。也没有性别差异。结果支持了抱持左侧的选择性,但不支持注意力假说,无论是否有情感因素。它们还引发了关于抱持者性别的贡献的问题。我们最后提出了解决这些问题的建议。

相似文献

1
Are only infants held more often on the left? If so, why? Testing the attention-emotion hypothesis with an infant, a vase, and two chimeric tests, one "emotional," one not.只有婴儿更常被抱在左侧吗?如果是这样,为什么?用一个婴儿、一个花瓶和两个嵌合体测试来检验注意力 - 情感假设,一个测试是“情感性的”,另一个不是。
Laterality. 2019 Jan;24(1):65-97. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2018.1475482. Epub 2018 May 16.
2
Why are infants held on the left? A test of the attention hypothesis with a doll, a book, and a bag.为什么要把婴儿抱在左边?用玩偶、书和包检验注意假设。
Laterality. 2010 Sep;15(5):548-71. doi: 10.1080/13576500903064018. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
3
Left-side infant holding: a test of the hemispheric arousal-attentional hypothesis.
Brain Cogn. 2001 Jun-Jul;46(1-2):159-65. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2626(01)80056-7.
4
When left means right: an explanation of the left cradling bias in terms of right hemisphere specializations.当左即右:从右半球特化角度解释左抱偏好。
Dev Sci. 2004 Feb;7(1):19-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00318.x.
5
Lateral biases for holding infants: early opinions, observations, and explanations, with some possible lessons for theory and research today.
Brain Cogn. 2002 Mar-Apr;48(2-3):392-4. doi: 10.1006/brcg.2001.1384.
6
The contribution of postural bias to lateral preferences for holding human infants.
Brain Cogn. 2002 Mar-Apr;48(2-3):352-6.
7
Adults' preferences for side-of-hold as portrayed in paintings of the Madonna and Child.成人对圣母和圣婴画像中所持婴儿体位的偏好。
Laterality. 2009 Nov;14(6):590-617. doi: 10.1080/13576500902745781. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
8
Most adults show opposite-side biases in the imagined holding of infants and objects.
Brain Cogn. 2002 Mar-Apr;48(2-3):258-63.
9
Cradling side preference is associated with lateralized processing of baby facial expressions in females.抱持侧偏好与女性对婴儿面部表情的偏侧化处理有关。
Brain Cogn. 2009 Jun;70(1):67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.12.010. Epub 2009 Feb 14.
10
Left side cradling of an appetitive doll is associated with higher heart rate variability and attenuated startle in nulliparous females.对未生育女性而言,将一个诱导性玩偶抱于左侧与较高的心率变异性及减弱的惊吓反应相关。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Oct;74(1):53-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.07.002. Epub 2009 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Ethnic Prejudice in the Modulation of Cradling Lateralization.种族偏见在调节抱持侧化中的作用。
J Nonverbal Behav. 2021;45(2):187-205. doi: 10.1007/s10919-020-00346-y. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
2
The Relationship Between the Left-Cradling Bias and Attachment to Parents and Partner.左抱偏好与对父母及伴侣依恋之间的关系
Evol Psychol. 2019 Apr-Jun;17(2):1474704919848117. doi: 10.1177/1474704919848117.
3
The left-cradling bias and its relationship with empathy and depression.左抱偏爱及其与同理心和抑郁的关系。
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 16;9(1):6141. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42539-6.